Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001218
Original file (20120001218.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001218 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was drafted on 
9 April 1944.

2.  The applicant states he was drafted in April 1944 and was discharged for the purpose of immediate reenlistment on 1 November 1945.  He was subsequently honorably discharged from active duty on 26 November 1946 after serving 
1 year, 7 months, and 18 days.  He contends that he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) in 1949 and his unit was activated on 16 January 1951.  He was released from active duty on 17 August 1952 and his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) states in item 24 that his net service was 4 years, 2 months, and 16 days, which means he would have had to serve on active duty the first time for at least 2 years, 
7 months, and 18 days.

3.  The applicant provides two WD AGO Forms 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) and a DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered based on the documents provided by him.

3.  A WD AGO Form 53-55 indicates he was inducted into the Army on 9 April 1945 and entered active duty on the same date.  It also shows he was discharged on 1 November 1945 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.  Item 37 (Total Length of Service) of the WD AGO Form 53-55 for this period of service shows 6 months and 23 days of continental service and no foreign service.

4.  A second WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he enlisted on 2 November 1945 and he was separated from active duty on 26 November 1946 for a total of 1 year and 25 days of active duty service.  Item 39 (Prior Service) shows 6 months and 23 days.  Item 43 (Longevity for Pay Purposes) shows 1 year, 
7 months, and 18 days.

5.  A DD Form 214 shows that he entered active duty as a member of the ARNG on 16 January 1951 and that he was released from active duty on 17 August 1952 and transferred to the ARNG.  The Statement of Service for Pay Purposes section of the DD Form 214 shows 1 year, 7 months, and 2 days of net service completed this period and 2 years, 7 months, and 14 of other service completed for pay purposes for a total of 4 years, 2 months, and 16 days of total net service completed for pay purposes.

6.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was drafted on 
9 April 1944 or that he served on active duty prior to 9 April 1945.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separations Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his records should be corrected to show he was drafted on 9 April 1944 has been carefully reviewed.

2.  The evidence shows he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 9 April 1945, reenlisted on 2 November 1945, and that he was separated on 
26 November 1946 for a total of 1 year, 7 months, and 18 days of active duty service.

3.  The applicant's exact date of enlistment in the ARNG is not known; however, the evidence further shows that he served on active duty as a member of the ARNG from 16 January 1951 to 17 August 1952 for a total of 1 year, 7 months, and 2 days of active service this period.  He was issued a DD Form 214 for this period of service that shows 2 years, 7 months, and 14 days of other service completed for pay purposes.  Service for pay does not necessarily mean service on active duty.  There is the possibility that this entry pertains to both, active and inactive service.

4.  Regardless of the entries shown on his DD Form 214, without documentation showing he was drafted, inducted, or entered active duty prior to 9 April 1945, there is insufficient evidence on which to base correcting his records to show he was drafted on 9 April 1944.

5.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis to grant the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001218



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001218



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003165

    Original file (20090003165.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: EAME Campaign Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), WWII Victory Medal, and American Theater Ribbon. The evidence also confirms that based on being held as a POW during WWII from 16 December 1944 through 2 April 1945, the applicant is eligible for the POW Medal, which should also be awarded and added to his reconstructed record and WD AGO Form 53-55...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004145C070206

    Original file (20050004145C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Date of Entry into Active Service) of his separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) be corrected. The applicant is advised that because his initial entry date of 18 April 1944 is adequately documented in Item 43 of his 2 November 1946 WD AGO Form 53-55, he should suffer no injustice based on the 6 November 1945 entry date contained in Item 24. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003857

    Original file (20090003857.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Service) to show he was honorably separated on 19 November 1952 instead of 2 April 1946. The WD AGO Form 53-55 is prepared for all enlisted personnel separated from the service due to discharge, release from active duty or transfer to a Reserve Component, or retired. The applicant contends that the date of separation shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show 19...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023059

    Original file (20100023059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records: * to show award of the Belgian Fourragere * to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) * to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * to show his service in North Africa [Algeria-French Morocco campaign] * to explain his lost time in 1943 2. On 6 November 1964, this Board sent a letter to the applicant informing him that his request to delete the 17 days of lost time from his records was denied because of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068829C070402

    Original file (2002068829C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    His WD AGO Form 53-55, item 6 shows his organization as Company H (which the Center for Military History has stated was in the 2d Battalion), 143d Infantry Regiment; item 31 shows that he was awarded the CIB and the Expert Rifle Badge; item 33 shows that he was awarded the BSM (General Orders 348 is listed as the authority but the BSM is not identified as being with “V” device), the World War II Victory Medal, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Army of Occupation Medal, and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017789C070206

    Original file (20050017789C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    William Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that item 10 (Date of Birth) on his initial WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) be corrected to show 12 June 1929 instead of 12 June 1926. A DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 3 September 1968, amended the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 October 1959 to show the Army of Occupation Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023896

    Original file (20110023896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was issued multiple separation documents throughout his career, including the following WD AGO Forms 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) and/or DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * WD AGO Form 53-55 for the period 21 December 1943-28 October 1945 that shows – * he arrived in New Guinea on 3 August 1944 * he was awarded the Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014371

    Original file (20110014371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His military records are not available to the Board for review. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015209

    Original file (20080015209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. DD Form 214, dated 26 May 1950, shows: (1) he reenlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 6 June 1947; (2) at the time of his separation, he was assigned to the 1122d Army Supply Unit, Army Base, Boston, Massachusetts; (3) he completed 2 years, 11 months, and 21 days of creditable military service during this period, 10 months and 24 days of which was foreign service; (4) he was honorably discharged in the rank of sergeant first class on 26 May 1950; (5) Item 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103425C070208

    Original file (2004103425C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: OCTOBER 21, 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004103425 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Belgian Fourragere, which was awarded to the applicant's unit for the period 22 through 27 December 1944 is already shown on the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all...