Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001114
Original file (20120001114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120001114 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) title was that of a “Textile Foreman.”

2.  The applicant states when he was promoted and awarded "MOS 43J4O" his MOS title changed from textile repairman to textile foreman.  However, his 
DD Form 214 still reflects that he was a textile repairman.

3.  The applicant provides a list of Vietnam era MOSs and a copy of his previous Board proceedings.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 October 1966 and he completed his training in MOS 43J1O (Textile Repairman).  

3.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 29 June 1967 and promoted to the rank of sergeant in MOS 43J4O (Textile Foreman) on 30 April 1968.  He departed Vietnam on 8 July 1968 and was transferred to Fort Dix, New Jersey where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 9 July 1968 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 9 months, and 3 days of active service.

4.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of REFRAD shows in block 23a that his specialty number and title were "43J2O Textile Repairman."  His 
DD Form 214 was subsequently corrected by this Board to show his specialty number was "43J4O."

5.  Army Regulation 611-201 (Personnel Selection and Classification), in effect at the time, provides that the duty title for MOS 43J at skill levels one (1) through three (3) is that of a textile repairman.  The duty title for MOS 43J at skill level four (4) is that of a textile foreman.  Under today’s standards MOS 43J has changed to MOS 43M (Fabric Repair Specialist).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 does not reflect his correct specialty title in block 23a has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  The applicant’s correct specialty number was "43J4O" and the correct title for that MOS was "Textile Foreman."   

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect his correct specialty title.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entry “Textile REP” from block 23a and adding the entry “Textile Foreman.” 




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001114



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120001114



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011416

    Original file (20100011416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Good Conduct Medal [now known as the Army Good Conduct Medal], and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device and that he held MOS 16P....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012913

    Original file (20080012913.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 23a (Specialty Number or Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected because he never served as a cook. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing primary MOS 43B2O, Textile Repairman in Item 23a of the applicant’s DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010258

    Original file (20090010258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 6 November 1972, which corrected his DD Form 214, dated 9 November 1970, to show award of the Air Medal with the Numeral 6. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System) provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who can perform duties required of any 3-character MOS may be awarded that MOS. Although the applicant served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004151

    Original file (20120004151.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 22 (MOS) the entry: * additional MOS 68J (Aircraft Instrument Repairman), effective 25 April 1967 * secondary MOS 68F (Aircraft Electrician), effective 1 July 1967 * primary MOS 76W2O (Petroleum Storage Specialist), effective 15 November 1967 b. item 27 (Military Education) he completed Aircraft Instrument Repairman course...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016117

    Original file (20140016117.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since the applicant's primary MOS was 57G at the time of his REFRAD, which is properly shown in item 23a of his DD Form 214, there is no basis for granting his request to change his MOS on his DD Form 214. Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013658

    Original file (20130013658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: a. he completed his General Educational Development (GED); b. he served as a cook; c. his dates of service in Vietnam; and d. he had a monthly allotment in the amount of $100.00. However, there is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence which shows he completed his GED. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base amending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019398

    Original file (20110019398.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that his specialty number (block 23a) was 12B20 (Combat Engineer). He completed his basic training at Fort Polk, Louisiana and his advanced individual training as a pioneer at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri before being transferred to Vietnam on 25 April 1966 for duty in MOS 56A10 (supply handler). Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003920

    Original file (20110003920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there are no orders or any other evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded 67N or any other 67-series MOS as his PMOS. Thus, item 23a of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the correct PMOS code and title. Therefore, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's military service records or the entry in item 23a of his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001051539C070420

    Original file (2001051539C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 21 August 1969 to show his rank as staff sergeant (E-6) instead of specialist five (E-5); to show military occupational specialty (MOS) 76W40 (petroleum storage specialist) instead of 63B20 (wheel vehicle repairman); and award of the Bronze Star Medal. In support of his application, he submits a copy of Special Orders Number 229, dated 17 August 1969, which show his rank as “SP5”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017022

    Original file (20070017022.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Scott W. Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he performed duties as a crew chief. The applicant’s DA Form 20 does not show and there is no other evidence of record to show that he performed duties as a crew chief, and he audited his DA Form 20 shortly before he left Vietnam.