Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000757
Original file (20120000757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000757 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and 4b (Pay Grade) of his 13 July 1986 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5), and that if paid based on the incorrect rank at discharge, he be provided any pay due as a result.  

2.  The applicant states he was promoted to SGT/E-5 in 1985.  However, his DD Form 214 lists his rank and pay grade as specialist four/E-4 (SP4/E-4).  

3.  The applicant provides promotion documents in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 February 1982.  His DA Form 2 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part I) shows he was promoted to SGT/E-5 on 4 March 1985, as does item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record-Part II).

3.  The Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains U.S. Army Regional Personnel Center (RPC), Nurnberg Orders 85-66, dated 28 March 1985, which authorized the applicant's promotion to SGT/E-5 effective 1 April 1985 with a date of rank of 4 March 1985.  

4.  Nurnberg RPC Orders 97-24, dated 11 April 1986, directed the applicant’s assignment to the separation transfer point, Fort Dix, New Jersey for separation processing.  The standard name line (SNL) of these orders lists the applicant’s grade as SP4/E-4.  On 16 May 1986, these orders were amended to change his reporting date to the separation point.  The SNL of the amended orders lists his grade as SGT/E-5.  An Army Europe Form 5153-1 (Outprocessing Checklist) and a DA Form 664 (Service Member’s Statement Concerning Compensation from the Veterans Administration) completed during his separation processing both list his grade as SGT/E-5.  The MPRJ is void of any finance or pay-related records or documents.  

5.  On 13 July 1986, the applicant was honorably released from active duty after completing 4 years and 5 months of active duty service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time lists his grade as SP4/E-4 in items 4a and 4b.  

6.  Army Regulation 625-5 (Separation Documents) Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated the DA Forms 2 and  2-1 were the primary source records for information for entries on the DD Form 214, along with documents on file in the MPRJ.   

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to correct the rank and pay grade on his DD Form 214 and to be provided all back pay due as a result of the correction has been carefully considered and found to have partial merit.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to SGT/E-5 effective 1 April 1985 with a date of rank of 4 March 1985, and that this is the grade documented on his DA Forms 2 and 2-1.  

2.  Although there are some documents in the MPRJ listing his grade as SP4/E-4 dated after 1 April 1985, there are no orders or documents related to a reduction in grade.  Further, his amended separation orders and documents completed during his separation processing show his grade at the time was SGT/E-5.  As a result, it appears the grade entries in items 4a and 4b of the DD Form 214 was the result of administrative error.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his 
DD Form 214 accordingly.

3.  Absent any documents or finance records containing information related to the applicant’s pay at the time of separation, it must be presumed he was receiving pay based on the pay grade E-5 given the rank documented on his 
DA Forms 2 and 2-1.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the portion of the requested relief related to pay.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X____  ____X____  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending items 4a and 4b of his DD Form 214 by deleting the current entries and replacing them with the entries “Sergeant" and “E-5," respectively.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to back pay. 



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000757



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000757



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005469

    Original file (20140005469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5 and all back pay due as a result of the correction. Items 4a, 4b, and 12h of his 21 February 1986 DD Form 214 show this information as his rank, grade, and the effective date. c. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date as of the date he was REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014815

    Original file (20110014815.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Further, the USAR discharge orders that list his grade as SGT in the standard name line were published more than two years after his REFRAD and could have been the result of the unverified handwritten entries on the applicant’s DA Form 2 and DA Form 2-1. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063762C070421

    Original file (2001063762C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) he was promoted to the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5) and he was awarded the ARCOM that should be added to his DD Form 214. However, during its review of this case, the Board did note that while still serving on active duty, the applicant was awarded the Army Achievement Medal, for meritorious service from 21 May 1986 to 20 March 1987, and that this award was omitted from the list of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061078C070421

    Original file (2001061078C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably separated from active duty on 30 July 1982 in the rank and pay grade of SP4/E-4. The Board noted the applicant’s request that his military records be corrected to show his rank and pay grade as SGT/E-5 instead of SP4/E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009881

    Original file (20120009881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant provides: * Orders 64-10, issued by the 546th Personnel Service Company, Fort Hood, TX, dated 1 April 1988 * Permanent Orders 58-13, issued by the same headquarters, dated 28 March 1988 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009268

    Original file (20100009268.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    With the exception of the applicant's DD Form 214, all documents maintained in his military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) issued subsequent to the date of his promotion to the rank of SP4 lists his rank as SP4. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of SP4/E-4 on 1 January 1997 and this was the rank he held on his date of separation from active duty as evidenced by the DA Form 4187 and his separation orders. Therefore, items 4a, 4b, and 12h of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016769

    Original file (20090016769.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's rank/grade appears as CPL on: * a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), signed by him on 20 February 1992 * separation orders, dated 24 March 1992 * a DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part 1), dated 18 June 1992, showing he was promotable 8. The applicant's record contains no evidence and he has failed to provide any evidence showing he was promoted to the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show he was promoted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014982

    Original file (20070014982.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 15 June 1987, to show "specialist four (SP4)" instead of "private first class (PFC)" in Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and "E-4" instead of "E-3" in Item 4b (Pay Grade). DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 1 February 1987, shows that the applicant was promoted to PFC/E-3 in accordance with Army regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), effective 1 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014193

    Original file (20140014193.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5. His record does not contain any documentation showing he was recommended for or promoted to SGT during his active duty service. The applicant provides a certificate showing he was promoted to SGT effective 1 September 1989; however, his records do not contain any orders for the promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003136

    Original file (20090003136.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 September 1983 for a period of 4 years. The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows, in item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), that he was promoted to specialist four/pay grade E-4 effective 1 November 1985. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 13 of his DD Form 214 to include the Army...