Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000315
Original file (20120000315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 July 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120000315 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal on 20 January 1988 and it was never listed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an Army Achievement Medal Certificate, dated 20 January 1988.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 20 March 1984.  He completed training as a light weapons infantryman.

3.  After completing 3 years, 11 months, and 14 days of net active service this period, the applicant has honorably released from active duty on 3 March 1988, due to a reduction in authorized strength.

4.  The DD Form 214 he received shows the following awards:

* Army Service Ribbon
* Overseas Service Ribbon
* Air Assault Badge
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Army Lapel Button
* Parachutist Badge
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16)

5.  The available records do not show that orders were published awarding the applicant the Army Achievement Medal.

6.  The applicant submits a copy of a certificate showing he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal for exceptionally meritorious service during the period 29 October 1985 through 20 January 1988.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been noted.  His supporting evidence has been considered.

2.  In accordance with the applicable regulation, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required to be awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

3.  There are no orders in the available record, nor has the applicant submitted any orders to substantiate his contention that he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal on 20 January 1988.  Without the orders, the copy of the certificate he submitted is insufficient to warrant amending the applicant's
DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000315



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120000315



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011079

    Original file (20060011079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 5 December 2003. The evidence of record shows that Permanent Orders awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious achievement for the period 20 January 1989 to 14 March 1989. The evidence of record also shows that Permanent Orders awarded the applicant the Army Achievement Medal for meritorious service for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013306

    Original file (20140013306.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) - Reserve places of duty at Fort Hamilton and Brooklyn, NY * Item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service) - his Reserve and inactive service after 1988 * Item 12f (Foreign Service) - deployment to Honduras * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014963

    Original file (20100014963.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to approve award of the Army Good Conduct Medal to the applicant and correct his records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary conduct,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002335

    Original file (20130002335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia) * Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) * Combat Infantryman Badge * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Purple Heart * Two awards of the Army Achievement Medal * Two awards of the Overseas Service Ribbon * Item 14 (Military Education) -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016694

    Original file (20090016694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Five awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's initial period of active duty service. Three awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's second period of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 27 August 1985 to 2 June 1988; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007398

    Original file (20080007398.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, and two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, and that the medals be issued to him. The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his request: a. DD Forms 214, dated 7 July 1988 and 2 November 1990. b. Therefore, he served a qualifying period of service for award of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012403

    Original file (20130012403.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award of Army Achievement, ARCOM, and Meritorious Service Medal) * ARCOM orders * Certificate of Achievement * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was deployed to SWA. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007251

    Original file (20130007251.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct number of awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). PO 195-014, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, OK, on 9 October 1987 awarded him the AGCM for service during the period 1 October 1984 through 30 September 1987. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017204

    Original file (20080017204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant received a second award of the Army Achievement Medal on 22 December 1988; he was separated on 21 January 1989, but the award was not included on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003498

    Original file (20120003498.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides a memorandum certifying his participation in ODS, an order for the Army Achievement Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), a memorandum of eligibility for the Army Good Conduct Medal, and his DD Form 214 in support of his request. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct...