Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023185
Original file (AR20110023185.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/11/18	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I made a poor decision that caused me my career in the Army.  However I feel that up to that point I was an exemplary Solider and NCO.  I worked very hard and sacrificed to achieve my goals in the Army.  I feel that I served honorably and humbly request that my discharge be upgraded.  I would like to think that my time in service would count for something.  Thank you for your time and consideration."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 110208
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110308   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: HHC, 589th Bde Spt Bn, Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 101026, wrongfully used D-Amphetamine and D-Methamphetamine (100809-100811); reduction to E-4 and extra duty for 45 days, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  33
Current ENL Date: 060627    Current ENL Term: 05 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	04  Yrs, 08  Mos, 12  Days ?????
Total Service:  		07  Yrs, 09  Mos, 10  Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	ARNG-030529-031117/NA
                                       IADT-031118-040312/HD
                                       ARNG-040313-041108/HD
                                       RA-040613-060626/HD
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92F10 H7 Petroleum Supply Spec/11B10 Infantryman   GT: 86   EDU: GED   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (051206-061118), (080610-090806)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM-2, AAM-2, AGCM-3, NDSM, ICM-W/3 CS, GWOTSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR-2,  

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed






 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 8 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using D-Amphetamine and D-Methamphetamine (100809-100811), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights. 
        
       On 17 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 17 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       
       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
       
       The applicant requested a change to the narrative reason for separation.  The narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph       14-12c(2), AR 635-200.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 4."  
       
       Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28, separation code, entered in block 26, and RE Code, entered in block 27 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.   
       
       The applicant contends up to the time he tested positive for drugs he was an exemplary Solider and NCO, he worked hard and sacrificed to achieve his goals in the Army.  The analyst acknowledges the applicant’s in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to overcome the discharge under reivew.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.   
       
VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 11 May 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated (111031).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110023185
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018190

    Original file (AR20110018190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 January 2011, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 August 2011. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120002980

    Original file (AR20120002980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs "tested positive for D-amphetamines," with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 May 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024838

    Original file (AR20110024838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 24 February 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015582

    Original file (AR20090015582.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "I wish to upgrade my discharge to Honorable so that I may re-enlist in the Army. On 10 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011309

    Original file (AR20090011309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100000389

    Original file (AR20100000389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 25 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110000499

    Original file (AR20110000499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On August 24, 2009 I was discharged from the Army under honorable conditions (General). I am requesting this change because I was discharged prior to 180 days of active service. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 August 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of illegal drugs, for testing positive for marijuana (090202),...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016145

    Original file (AR20100016145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: Applicant states: "The discharge was inequitable because the Sgt. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 October 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for being AWOL (060328-060817), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002557

    Original file (AR20080002557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003970

    Original file (AR20110003970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.