Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110011713
Original file (AR20110011713.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/06/02	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: "An upgrade or change is requested because the Army Reserve simply discharged me out of the blue with no explanation and no warnings.  I did miss a unit training assembly because I had a family problem.  However, I followed proper procedures and told my unit that I would not be able to attend a training assembly.  Although I did follow proper procedures the Army Reserve discharge me with a discharge that is "other than honorable."  If the Army Reserve wanted to discharge me the least the Reserve could have done was issue to me an "honorable discharge."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110421   Chapter: NIF       AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: 341st MC CO, Edgemont, PA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 080905    Current ENL Term: 08 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 07 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 07 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR-080905-080922/NA
                                       ADT-080923-090317/UNC
                                         (Concurrent Service)
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10/Automated Logistical Specialist   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Trenton, NJ
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 14 April 2011, DA HQS, 99th Regional Support Command, Fort Dix, NJ, Orders Number 11-104-00023, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 21 April 2011, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       The record contains a properly constituted Order, which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178.  The reason for the applicant’s discharge is not contained in the available record.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army Regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army.  The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization.  Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized, if the Soldier is in entry-level status.  However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and the documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the record shows that on 14 April 2011, DA HQS, 99th Regional Support Command, Fort Dix, NJ, Orders Number 11-104-00023, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 21 April 2011, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.
       
       The applicant contends that she was discharged with no explanation or warning.  The analyst noted the applicant's contentions, however, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 14 December 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: Veterans Office
                 State of New Jersey
                 Attn: Mr. William J. McDonnell
                 28 West State Street, Suite 514
                 Trenton, New Jersey 08625

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Discharge Orders, and DD Form 214 for a prior period of service.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder









Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110011713
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006639

    Original file (AR20120006639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief by changing the characterization of service to general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110006733

    Original file (AR20110006733.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    i finally went in and spoke to my commander and he said he will help me change my MOS to an MP. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100015302

    Original file (AR20100015302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004851

    Original file (AR20120004851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. c. Response to Issues,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011659

    Original file (AR20060011659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document indicates that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard of the state of New Jersey and as a Reserve of the Army under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27q, NGR 600-200, by reason of acts or patterns of misconduct, with a charactaerization of service of under other than honorable conditions, with a RE code of "3". The evidence of record shows on the applicant's DD Form 214 that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, Paragraph 8-26q, NGR 600-200, by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013926

    Original file (AR20070013926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance. An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017649

    Original file (AR20070017649.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014132

    Original file (AR20060014132.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The analyst noted that on 12 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 135-178, Chapter 9, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007913

    Original file (AR20080007913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Soldiers completing Phase I (BCT) remain in entry-level status until 90 days after beginning Phase II. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008170

    Original file (AR20090008170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicant contends she was being discharged for excessive absences from unit drills and this was a mistake because...