Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/05/19	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he served in the Army Reserves under Honorable Conditions.  He has also served the Government both in overseas and local operations with military officials.  He was discharged under false pretenses which are being investigated.  He has his transfer request, signed by the gaining command.  He also has email confirmation that he relocated due to job searching while looking for a unit with little or no assistance from the 0314 Chemical Company.  He also has proof of an incident that required medical treatment before he returned.  The personnel at 0314 Chemical Company previously tried to damage his records in 2007.  The personnel were given proper paperwork while he was in therapy and searching for a unit; they often said verbally that they did not like him without reason.  They even incorporated other members of the 81st to over look their actions.  Please feel free to contact him at any time or to get info from Senator [ recacted ]Office, from the VA, or Ms. P who still serves with [redacted  Chemical Company. She was the point of contact he used to file his grievance against the [redacted] Chemical Company.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: None
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 110315   Chapter: NIF      AR: 135-178
Reason: NIF	   RE:     SPD: NA   Unit/Location: HHD 314th Chemical Company (HEAVY), (WV31T1),  415th Chemical Brigade, Decatur, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  28
Current ENL Date: 080424    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  Enl Date taken from IWS, Enl contract is NIF
Current ENL Service: 	2  Yrs, 10 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Total Service:  		9  Yrs, 7   Mos, 11 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 000720 - 000827/NA
                                        IADT  000828 - 011314/HD
                                       USAR 011315 - 070410/GD
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10 Automated Logistical Specialist   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Rosedale, MD
Post Service Accomplishments: None



VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence shows the applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  The record indicates that on 10 March 2011, DA HQS, 81st Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, Orders number 11-069-00013 discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective 15 March 2011, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The record contains a properly constituted Order which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  This regulation provides the basis for involuntary separations from the USAR; specific categories include substandard performance of duty, moral or professional dereliction, in the interest of national security, as a result of trial by court martial, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, homosexual conduct, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without proper authority from unit training.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldier’s discharge from the Army.  However, the record shows that on 10 March 2011, DA HQS, 81st  Regional Support Command, Fort Jackson, SC, discharged the applicant from the Army Reserve, effective                15 March 2011, with a general under honorable conditions discharge.  All the facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. 
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration; such documentation would be copies of signed DA Forms 1380 showing RST dates, certified true copies of the unit attendance sign in log, and leave and earning statements.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the evidence is not available in the official record.
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 23 January 2012         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: Senator Ben Cardin, Care of : Venneta Edwards, Counsel, US/Tower 1, Suite 1710, 1005 Charles Sreet, Baltimore, MD 21201

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement and discharge orders

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder













Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110011070
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages