Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/03/16 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she requests an upgrade of her discharge to general, under honorable conditions or a fully honorable discharge. She contends that an upgrade would benefit her in obtaining employment. The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 981019
Discharge Received: Date: 981023 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct RE: SPD: JGA Unit/Location: E Co, 369th AG Bn, Fort Jackson, SC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 980706 Current ENL Term: 04 Years 00
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Baltimore, MD
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 19 October 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for a lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. She was advised of her rights.
On 19 October 1998, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.
On 20 October 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 11, of this regulation, in pertinent part, states that a member may be separated for unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status. This provision of the regulation applies to Soldiers who can not meet the minimum standards for training, have demonstrated that they are not qualified for retention because they can not adapt socially or emotionally to military life or because they lack the aptitude, ability, motivation or self discipline for military service, or they have demonstrated characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued military service. The regulation requires uncharacterized service for separation under this chapter.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the application she submitted, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized.
Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.
Army Regulation 635-200, also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
The applicant contends that an upgrade would benefit her in obtaining employment. The Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 14 October 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, undated.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110005229
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009440
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 26 March 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life due to an adjustment disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 27 March 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014277
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Even though the applicant did not state a type of characterization of service on her DD For 149 that she submitted, the Army Discharge Review Board looks at the narrative reason for separation and the characterization of service granted, which falls under the purview of this board.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006312
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 January 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to the military motivationally with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016111
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on (date not in file), the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. On 16 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002706
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002569
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Board Vote:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018480
On 3 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024465
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016528
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military environment, repeated APFT failure, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017264
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life and failure to complete the APFT requirements with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldiers service will be...