Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/03/07 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states: "My RE Code to be changed from 4 to 1. My general discharge be changed from general to honorable. I am doing what is necessary to maintain good moral conduct. At the time I was naïve and an immature boy. I am a wise man now and deserve an opportunity to prove that I am at my best. I am still in shape, exercise daily, in school, and will be an assett instead of a hindrance to the Army, friends, superiors, and fellow Soldiers."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050607
Discharge Received: Date: 050622 Chapter: 14 -12c(2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct -Abuse of Illegal Drugs RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: 115th Field Hospital, Fort Polk, LA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050428, Wrongful use of methamphetamines between (050224 and 050324), reduction to E1; forfeiture of $617.00 per month for 2 months (suspended); extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days, (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 18
Current ENL Date: 000718 Current ENL Term: 06 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 11 Mos, 05 Days ?????
Total Service: 04 Yrs, 11 Mos, 05 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 91P10/X Ray Specialist GT: 96 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: ????? Combat: ?????
Decorations/Awards: AAM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, NCOPDR, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Memphis, TN
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states: "I am currently enrolled in college. I am getting my Bachelor's of Science in Healthcard Admin. I went into the National Guard and received an Honorable Discharge as a medic. I work at the Post Office and am really looking forward to going back into the Army." Records show that the applicant served in the Army National Guard (051017-081031) and was discharged with a honorable discharge.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 7 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for having tested positive (050324) for using methamphetamines , with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 7 June 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf which was not found in the available records The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
The separation authority's memorandum directing that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions is not contained in the available record and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. However, on 20 June 2005, DA HQ, Joint Readiness Training Center & Fort Polk Fort Polk, LA, Orders 171-0312, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army; effective 22 June 2005.
The applicant's record contains a CID Report, dated 27 April 2005.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The analyst acknowledges the applicant's successful transition to civilian life and noted the many accomplishments outlined with the application and in the documents with the application. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue of wanting his RE code changed; however, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 30 September 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, Self-authored letter, Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army National Guard, NGB Form 22, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110004425
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006646
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for being found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for multiple charges of wrongfully using cocaine, ecstasy and methamphetamine (050822), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002557
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016088
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007787
On 18 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the evidence of record shows that the command attempted to assist the applicant in performing and conducting himself to Army standards by providing counseling and by the imposition of non-judicial punishment. The Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004727
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 December 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006628
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for desertion, without authority and with intent to remain away, deserting herself from the Army (050223 050505), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 August 2005, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010516
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The Applicant states in effect: "Discharge states "drug abuse" when I am the one who sought the Alcohol Substance Abuse Program. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015237
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongful use of amphetamines and d-methamphetamines (020405-020422), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 June 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003970
Applicant Name: ????? On 1 November 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because his quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090011634
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge.