IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  14 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110025060 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service during World War II.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to Company F, 314th Infantry Regiment as a rifleman and was wounded in action.  He further contends that his records were never updated to show his additional infantry training in England to become a replacement Soldier for the 79th Infantry Division.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the document provided by the applicant is sufficient to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 provided by the applicant shows he:

	a.  entered active duty on 7 May 1943 and arrived in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) on 13 June 1944;

	b.  held military occupational specialty (MOS) 835 (Supply Clerk);

	c.  was wounded on 2 December 1944 and awarded the Purple Heart;

	d.  departed the ETO on 26 February 1946; and 

	e.  was honorably discharged on 13 March 1946.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge was established during World War II to provide special recognition of the unique role of the Army infantryman, the only Soldier whose daily mission is to close with and destroy the enemy and to seize and hold terrain.  The badge was intended as an inducement for individuals to join the infantry while serving as a morale booster for infantrymen.  In developing the Combat Infantryman Badge, the War Department did not dismiss or ignore the contributions of other branches.  Their vital contributions to the overall war effort were noted, but it was decided that other awards and decorations were sufficient to recognize their contributions.  From the beginning, Army leadership has taken care to retain the badge for the unique purpose for which it was established.  The War Department received requests to award the Combat Infantryman Badge to non-infantry individuals and units employed as infantry during tactical emergencies.  All of those requests were disapproved based on the fact that the regular infantryman lived, slept, ate, and fought as an infantryman on a continuous and indefinite basis without regard to the tactical situation.

5.  War Department Circular 269-1943 established the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Expert Infantryman Badge to recognize and provide an incentive to infantrymen.  The Expert Infantryman Badge was to be awarded for attainment of certain proficiency standards or by satisfactory performance of duty in action against the enemy.  The Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded for exemplary 


conduct in action against the enemy.  War Department Circular 186-1944 further provided that the Combat Infantryman Badge was to be awarded only to infantrymen serving with infantry units of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, World War II holders of the Combat Infantryman Badge received a monthly pay supplement known as combat infantry pay and holders of the Expert Infantryman Badge were entitled to expert infantry pay.  Soldiers had economic as well as intangible reasons to ensure that their records were correct; therefore, pay records are frequently the best available source to verify entitlement to this award.  The Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command has advised in similar cases that, during World War II, the Combat Infantryman Badge was normally awarded only to enlisted individuals who served in the following positions:

* Light machine gunner (604)
* Heavy machine gunner (605)
* Platoon sergeant (651)
* Squad leader (653)
* Rifleman (745)
* Automatic rifleman (746)
* Heavy weapons NCO (812)
* Gun crewman (864)

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service during World War II because he was assigned to an infantry company as a rifleman and was wounded.

2.  The available evidence clearly shows the applicant was assigned to an infantry company and received the Purple Heart for a wound received as a result of enemy action.  Unfortunately, the evidence also shows that he held a supply clerk MOS.  There is no available evidence showing that he held an infantryman MOS or performed infantryman duties to the standard required for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of their service in arms.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X__ _  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025060



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110025060



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1