Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024736
Original file (20110024736.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024736 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of the amount of severance pay shown on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  He states the Soldier who assisted him with his paperwork at Fort Bragg, NC, told him the amount of severance pay entered on his DD Form 214 was incorrect.  The DD Form 214 shows $67,435.20, but the correct amount is $39,337.20.  When he asked for correction of the error, he was told the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) would have the correct amount in their records.  

3.  He provides letters from DFAS and the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 11 August 1970, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  On 14 March 1972, he was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his military service obligation.  He was discharged from the USAR on 10 August 1976.  On 11 November 1978, he enlisted in the USAR, where he served until he was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 26 February 1999.  On 24 August 2000, he returned to an active status in the USAR.  

3.  On 25 January 2003, the 81st Regional Support Command, Birmingham, AL, issued Orders M-025-0036 ordering him to active duty for 365 days in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with a report date of 27 January 2003.

4.  On 2 February 2004, the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, issued Orders A-02-400937 ordering the applicant to active duty for a period of 120 days effective 27 January 2004 for the purpose of active duty medical extension.  The orders were later amended to change the period of active duty to 210 days.

5.  His official military personnel file does not contain documentation of the circumstances of his discharge in 2004.

6.  He provides a DD Form 214 showing he was honorably discharged for disability with severance pay on 16 July 2004.  Item 18 (Remarks) of this 
DD Form 214 shows he received severance pay in the amount of $67,435.20.

7.  He provides a letter, dated 10 May 2005, DFAS sent to the VA in response to a request for information on his separation pay.  DFAS informed the VA he had received separation pay in the amount of $39,337.20.  DFAS noted that they only report what is shown on the member's pay account not considering the amount shown on the DD Form 214.

8.  He provides a letter from the VA, dated 13 May 2005, informing him of the VA's decision on his claim for service-connected disability compensation.  The letter informed him the VA was required to hold back part of his compensation until the severance pay he had received was paid back.  The letter shows he had received severance pay in the amount of $39,337.20.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The evidence of record shows an error in the amount of severance pay entered on the applicant's DD Form 214.  DFAS confirmed he had received $39,337.20 in severance pay.  This is the amount that should be shown in item 18 of his 
DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 18 of his DD Form 214 to show he received $39,337.20 in severance pay.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024736





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024736



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020581

    Original file (20130020581.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows an entitlement to separation pay; however, he didn't receive the money. They do not show an entitlement to/payment of separation pay. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant received payment of separation pay at the time of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011496

    Original file (20140011496.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It does not appear from the record that DFAS is withholding VSI payments because the applicant is now receiving VA disability compensation. The statute authorizing disability severance pay provides that, "the amount of disability severance pay received under this section shall be deducted from any compensation for the same disability to which the former member of the armed forces or his dependents become entitled under any law administered by [VA]." However, the DFAS determination as to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000572

    Original file (20110000572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 February 2004 to show he received $16,208.10 of disability severance pay instead of the $27,237.60 that is currently shown on his DD Form 214. His DD Form 214 in question shows in item 18 (Remarks) disability severance pay in the amount of $27,237.60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021668

    Original file (20110021668.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she was transferred to the Retired Reserve with eligibility for retired pay at age 60 instead of discharged due to disability with severance pay. In view of the foregoing, the applicant's record should be corrected to show she elected Reserve Retirement in lieu of severance pay as follows: a. correcting her DD Form 214 and/or any related documents to show she was separated due to physical disability - other with an SPD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009681

    Original file (20130009681.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Correction of her retirement orders to show she was retired for a disability vice in accordance with (IAW) Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), chapter 61. c. Correction of her DD Form 214 and retirement orders to show she received a permanent disability retirement effective 4 November 2004 vice being placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Orders Number D139-27, issued by the U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA), dated 19 May 2010, show: * she held the rank of SGT * she was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004700

    Original file (20090004700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to rectify the multiple errors, it is appropriate to correct the record to show that the applicant had 20 qualifying years of service as of 25 May 1992, that he was issued a proper 20-year letter, that he elected to receive non-regular retirement in lieu of disability severance pay, that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve 26 May 1992 with entitlement to retired pay upon attaining age 60, and that he was placed on the Retired List effective 26 June 2008 with entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005039

    Original file (20150005039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 November 2014, the USAPDA issued the applicant a DA Form 199-2 (Revised PEB Proceedings) showing his disability rating for sleep apnea and directing his medical retirement retroactive to 23 April 2000, the date he was discharged by reason of disability with entitlement to severance pay. In November 2014, the USAPDA corrected the applicant's records and indicated that the CoFC (File Number 07-328C) directed his previous disability findings be amended to reflect permanent disability...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007809

    Original file (20090007809.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge. With respect to any financial hardship, while the Board is sympathetic to this issue, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was issued an order to active duty, an order for his release from active duty, and a DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016409

    Original file (20140016409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the remaining portion of separation pay he received in 1988 not be recouped. Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to direct or recommend changes in military records to correct the error or injustice, if persuaded that material error or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014180

    Original file (20100014180.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This time accounts for his first period of Regular Army active service and his 42 days of active service while in the Reserve components. A letter, dated 27 July 2010, from DFAS to a Member of Congress states, in pertinent part, the applicant's military records reflect he has 29 years, 3 months, and 11 days for his service base pay; the Department of the Army retired the applicant with 24 years, 4 months, and 26 days of total active service (service percent multiplier); and the service...