Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024674
Original file (20110024674.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024674 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and additional awards authorized be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states he did not receive any awards upon separation from the military service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 10 July 1963.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 72B (Communications Center Specialist).  

3.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received a “Good” conduct rating during his assignment period 10 July 1963 to 27 September 1963 while in basic training, and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the AGCM in the list of earned awards.

4.  The applicant’s record revealed he received a DA Form 2627 (Summarized Record of Proceedings under Article 15 UCMJ) on 19 August 1963.

5.  On 16 May 1966, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of specialist four/E-4, after completing 2 years,
10 months, and 7 days of active military service.  His DD Form 214 shows he earned the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle). 

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974,    2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a date to be determined.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.   The regulation in effect at the time required a member receive all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and not to have had a court-martial in order to qualify for the AGCM.  In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant received a "good" conduct rating during his assignment in basic training.  Additionally, he received a summarized Article 15 on 19 August 1963.  As a result, the applicant did not qualify to be awarded the AGCM at the time of his REFRAD.

2.  The evidence of record also confirms that based on his honorable active service for the period 10 July 1963 to 16 May 1966, the applicant is eligible for the NDSM.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this award to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x_____  __x______  ___x_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214 the NDSM.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the AGCM.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024674





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024674



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007219

    Original file (20100007219.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also requests that his DD Form 214 be further corrected by adding the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) and the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, did not identify the Presidential Citation as a military unit award. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Presidential Citation, the NDSM, and AGCM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019631

    Original file (20130019631.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served from 31 October 1963 to 4 April 1966 and was discharged without receiving any medals * his service records reflect "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings at each duty station 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002035

    Original file (20130002035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The award may be awarded retroactively to those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014310

    Original file (20140014310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and Army Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the NDSM is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and 11 September 2001 and a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015735

    Original file (20130015735.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008409

    Original file (20120008409.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains four DD Forms 214. a. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (3rd Award) for this period and to correct his final DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 83d Ordnance Battalion (Ammunition), General Orders Number 3, dated 7 March 1963, to show the period for the AGCM (2nd Award) as "28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026336

    Original file (20100026336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090004554 on 28 July 2009. The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 21 July 1961...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002941

    Original file (20110002941.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of his official records show he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of service and his records are void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990 and 30 November 1995, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014943

    Original file (20140014943 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) and any other awards to which he may be entitled. The applicant had "excellent" character and efficiency ratings throughout his service and there is no evidence of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM (1st award). As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004890

    Original file (20140004890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show all of his authorized awards for his service in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 9 October 1963 to 4 October 1965. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * Awarding...