Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024473
Original file (20110024473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  31 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024473


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he entered on 31 August 1967.

2.  The applicant states he entered the Army on 31 August 1967, not 20 February 1968 as shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his pre-enlistment Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination) and Standard Form 89 (Report of Medical History).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant completed a Report of Medical History and underwent a pre-enlistment medical examination on 31 August 1967.

3.  On 20 February 1968, he completed a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) and enlisted for a period of 2 years.  In a supporting document to the enlistment contract, he acknowledged that he was enlisting in the Regular Army for 2 years of active duty with transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) for 4 years.  If he was released from active duty with 3 years of active service, he would not be involuntarily transferred to a drilling USAR unit.

4.  The applicant entered active duty on 20 February 1968, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Field Wireman).

5.  He was released from active duty on 10 Novembers 1970 under the early release program for overseas returnees and transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  His DD Form 214 shows his date of entry as 20 February 1968.  He completed 2 years, 8 months, and 21 days of active service during this period with no other service.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version then in effect stated the entry in item 17c (Date of Entry) is the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant completed a medical examination for the purpose of enlistment in the Regular Army on 31 August 1967, this document does not show he enlisted in Regular Army or the USAR as of that date.

2.  The entry date shown on a DD Form 214 is the date a Soldier enters active duty.  The applicant has not provided and the record does not contain any evidence showing he enlisted in the Regular Army or entered active duty prior 20 February 1968.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023514



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024473



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015018

    Original file (20100015018.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he had 3 years of active duty service as of 31 January 1968. The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show he completed 3 years of active duty service during the period February 1965 to 31 January 1968. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show he completed any active duty service during the period 12 February 1965 through 31 January 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005512

    Original file (20120005512.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued at that time shows he was awarded the: * Parachutist Badge * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Purple Heart * BSM 10. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015025

    Original file (20130015025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 17 (Current Active Service Other Than By Induction) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show "Ordered To Active Duty" vice "Ordered To ACDUTRA [Active Duty For Training]." The regulation stated in: * Item 17 - check appropriate space to indicate means of entry on the current active service; for ACDUTRA personnel, check "other" and enter "Ordered To ACDUTRA" * Item 17b - for ACDUTRA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018177

    Original file (20070018177.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show the correct rank/grade and date of separation. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time captured his active duty service from the date of his induction (15 August 1966) to the date of his separation from active duty (14 August 1968). Evidence of record shows that the applicant’s appointment/promotion to the temporary grade of SP5/E-5 was effective on 30 September 1968, after the applicant was separated from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007587C070205

    Original file (20060007587C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), with an effective date of 15 February 1968, to show his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 13A1O and that he served in Vietnam. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 February 1968, should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021112

    Original file (20130021112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), which was later created after his discharge from active duty and subsequent appointment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), shows he served in: * Vietnam, 1 October 1967 to 1 October 1968 * Germany, 17 September 1969 to 26 January 1971 * Vietnam, 28 February 1971 to 27 February 1972 6. 2nd Battalion, 35th Artillery (1 June 1968 to on or about 12 September 1968) was also cited for award of Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021831

    Original file (20130021831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 February 1967 to show awards for his service in Vietnam, including "combat ribbons," the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960). The applicant had prior enlisted service in the Army National Guard, Army of the United States, and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR). He did serve in Vietnam as a WO during the period of service ending 20 July 1968, and the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016551

    Original file (20140016551.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this training. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. Records show he was awarded the VSM and that he participated in three campaigns.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018223

    Original file (20090018223.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not indicate the Purple Heart award for wounds received in Vietnam on 30 March 1968. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States using the last name as shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015012

    Original file (20080015012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that the applicant entered active duty for training on 29 March 1967 and was honorably released from active duty on 29 July 1967. His DD Form 214 correctly shows the dates of entry and separation and the net period of active service. It appears that the applicant’s periods of service documented on the NA Form 13041 were performed as part of his USAR training obligation and could not be entered on the DD Form 214 as they occurred outside the period covered by...