IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 22 May 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024428
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD).
2. The applicant states he deserves an upgrade because he served his country with honor, dignity, and respect. Further, he states he went to war in the Republic of Vietnam to serve his country with honor.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army, on 26 August 1965. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11H (Infantry Direct Fire Crewman). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3.
3. He was punished under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on the following dates:
a. 24 March 1966, for intentionally violating company pass policy, on
14 March 1966.
b. 22 August 1966, for being absent without leave (AWOL) during the period 17 August 1966 through 22 August 1970.
4. On 8 February 1967, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial, for violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ, for being AWOL during the period 15 October 1966 through 17 December 1966. He was sentenced to confinement with hard labor at six months and forfeiture of 60 dollars pay per month for six months.
5. The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge are not available for review with this case. However, his record contains a duly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows he was discharged on 28 April 1967, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212, with a character of service of under conditions other than honorable and a separation program number (SPN) of 28B (frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities). This form also shows he completed a total of 1 year, 1 month, and 15 days of creditable active service and he accrued 132 days of lost time.
6. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.
7. Army Regulation 635-212, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel for unfitness or unsuitability. Paragraph 6a(1) of the regulation provided, in pertinent part, that members involved in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities were subject to separation for unfitness.
8. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 3-7a, provides that an HD is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an HD.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request that his discharge be upgraded to an HD was carefully considered, and it was determined that there is insufficient evidence to support this request.
2. The applicant was punished on several occasions for acts of AWOL.
3. The applicant's record is void of the facts and circumstances that led to his discharge; however, the applicant was convicted by court-martial.
4. It is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process. The applicant provided no information that would indicate the contrary. Further, it is presumed the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
5. Based on his record of indiscipline, which includes 138 days of AWOL, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. This misconduct rendered his service unsatisfactory. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge to HD or general.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110024428
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110024428
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004646
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The separation authority could issue an honorable discharge (HD) or general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions if warranted by the member's overall record of service; however, a UD was normally considered appropriate for members...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009930
The separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), currently in effect, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019027
On 4 December 1967, his commander informed him he was recommending him for discharge for unfitness under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 (Personnel Separations - Discharge - Unfitness and Unsuitability) by reason of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000157
On 20 March 1967, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The applicant was advised by counsel of his separation for unfitness on 10 March 1967 and the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation on 20 March 1967 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005219
The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to have his undesirable discharge upgraded to an honorable discharge and he requests that the narrative reason be changed to reflect that he was discharged due to hardship. There is no available evidence to show he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The applicant's administrative discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003453
On 6 January 1967, the applicant pleaded guilty at a Special Court-Martial to one specification of being AWOL during the period on or about 7 November 1966 through on or about 9 December 1966. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090003453 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001067045C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 26 January 1968, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness and directed that the applicant be furnished an undesirable discharge. The Board reviewed the applicant’s record of service which included two nonjudicial punishments, two summary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000246
On 7 February 1967, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence as provided for hard labor without confinement for 2 months and forfeiture of $40.00 per month for 4 months. On 2 October 1973, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for a general discharge. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018490
BOARD DATE: 19 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018490 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He also provides a letter, dated 20 April 2010, from his psychiatrist who states: * the applicant is under his care in the PTSD clinic * he has been treating the applicant since August 2009 * the applicant has PTSD, major depressive disorder, and a history of cocaine, marijuana, and alcohol dependence * it is his opinion the applicant's PTSD and depression are related to his traumatic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006090
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge on 23 July 1981 and requested a personal appearance before that board. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.