Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024088
Original file (20110024088.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	31 May 2012  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110024088 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show she was retired in the pay grade of E-7 due to sufficient service for retirement.

2.  The applicant states that she had over 22 years of honorable service with no adverse actions prior to being court-martialed and should have been retired by reason of length of service.  She further states that she was unaware of the injustice until she was released in 2010 and contacted an outreach ministry.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of her chronological statement of retirement points and copies of her DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 September 1981 and served on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments until she was honorably discharged in the pay grade of E-5 on 10 September 1996.  She had served 15 years and 9 days of active service.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 11 September 1996 and continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments.  She was promoted to the pay grade of E-6 on 1 January 2003.

4.  The applicant was serving at Fort Irwin, California in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) program when she was convicted by a general court-martial of killing a man by stabbing him in the chest with a knife.  She was sentenced to 13 years of confinement, reduction to pay grade E-1 and a dishonorable discharge.  However, the convening authority approved only so much of the sentence pertaining to 10 years of confinement, reduction to pay grade E-1 and a dishonorable discharge. 

5.  On 19 July 2007, orders were published at Fort Sill, Oklahoma indicating that the applicant’s court-martial conviction had been affirmed and directed that her dishonorable discharge be executed.

6.  On 7 September 2007, the applicant was discharged pursuant to a duly affirmed court-martial conviction.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-200, in effect at the time, provided, pertinently, that an enlisted member who had completed 20 years but less than 30 years of active Federal service in the Armed Forces may at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army be retired at his or her request in accordance with Title 10, U.S Code, section 3914.  It also provides that enlisted members must be on active duty and serving honorably when they are retired by reason of length of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that she should have retired by reason of length of service was considered and appears to lack merit.

2.  At the time of the applicant's court-martial conviction she was not eligible for retirement because she was under a suspension of favorable personnel actions.  Once she was convicted she was no longer eligible for retirement.  The issuance of the dishonorable discharge extinguished her right to apply for retirement.  An individual must be serving honorably at the time of retirement.  Once she was discharged, she was ineligible to apply for retirement because an individual must be on active duty in good standing in order to apply for retirement and must be on active duty the day prior to retirement.  Accordingly, she is neither eligible for nor entitled to be retired by length of service.

3.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant’s request for retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024088



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110024088



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012361

    Original file (20080012361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The former spouse stated that the applicant retired in February 1988 after 20 years in the U.S. Army. In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge or a general discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009002

    Original file (20070009002.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his dishonorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The portion of the CRS Issue Brief for Congress that the applicant submits in support of his application indicates that a service member becomes entitled to retired pay upon completion of 20 years of service, regardless of age. Although Army Regulation 635-200 provides that a soldier who has completed 20 years but less than 30 years of active Federal Service in the United States Armed Forces may...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007064

    Original file (20090007064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must admit guilt to the charges against him or her or to a lesser included offense which authorizes the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge and he or she must indicate that he or she has been briefed and understands the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge he or she might receive. The applicant has failed to show through the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013883

    Original file (20130013883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that her discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a more favorable discharge. Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after charges have been preferred.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003912

    Original file (20090003912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was upgraded to a general discharge by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) and he now desires to be retired by length of service. On 16 October 1995, the applicant applied to the ADRB requesting that his discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021501

    Original file (20140021501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank as master sergeant (MSG), his pay grade as E-8, and his date of rank (DOR) as 11 March 1985. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3961, provides the legal authority for the retired grade of Army personnel on the Retired List. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he retired from active duty in the grade of E-8 because he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003546

    Original file (20120003546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was retired for length of service rather than being dishonorably discharged. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 3914 contains the legal authority for voluntary retirement of enlisted members with 20 or more, but less than 30 years, of active military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021195

    Original file (20100021195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. In this case, the evidence of record shows a review of the court-martial findings on the applicant was completed by OTJAG and it was determined these findings were correct in law and fact. Notwithstanding the equity relief provided by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015580

    Original file (20100015580.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to a general discharge. After consulting with defense counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001753

    Original file (20090001753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record failed to establish a basis upon which clemency could be granted and upon which the severity of the punishment imposed could be moderated with an upgrade of the applicant's dishonorable discharge. _________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the...