Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023882
Original file (20110023882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023882 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that his Service Number in block 2 contains an “8” as the last digit.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that his Service Number contains a “9” as the last digit instead of an “8”.

3.  The applicant provides copies of two orders reflecting his Service Number containing an “8” as the last digit and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the NPRC in 1973.  It is believed the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in Detroit, Michigan on 17 July 1956 for a period of 3 years.  He completed his training as a heavy artillery crewman and was transferred to Germany.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 30 June 1958.

4.  On 3 June 1959 letter orders were published redeploying the applicant to the United States for separation.  Those orders indicate that the last digit of his Service Number is an “8”.

5.  On 23 June 1959 orders were published at Fort Hamilton, New York directing the applicant’s release from active duty (REFRAD) as an early overseas returnee.  Those orders reflect that the last digit of his Service Number is an “8”.

6.  On 24 June 1959 he was honorably REFRAD as an overseas returnee.  He had served 2 years, 11 months and 8 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects in block 2 a Service Number ending with the last digit of “9”.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that the DD Form 214 will be prepared to reflect information that exists at the time the DD Form 214 is issued.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects his Service Number as containing a “9” as the last digit instead of an “8” has been noted and appears to have merit.

2.  Although his records are not available for review, the applicant has provided two orders that clearly show that the last digit of his Service Number is an “8”.

3.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show that the last digit of his Service Number is an “8” instead of a “9”.




BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his Service Number in block 2 of his DD Form 214 as shown on his Special Orders number 174 dated 23 June 1959.





      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023882





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023882



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015563

    Original file (20130015563.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) incorrectly reflects the last four digits of his SSN are "1875" instead of "8715." At the time of induction his SSN was recorded in his records as having the last four digits of "8715." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the last four digits of his SSN in block 3 of his DD Form 214 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002347

    Original file (20110002347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that the fifth digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) is a “0”; however, through a clerical error his DD Form 214 was incorrectly prepared to reflect a “9” in the fifth digit. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the fifth digit of his SSN as reflected in block 3 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120024627

    Original file (20120024627.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his correct Social Security Number (SSN), Date of Birth (DOB) and the date of his release from active duty (REFRAD). At the time of his induction, his SSN was recorded in his records as having the last four digits of “7820” and his DOB was recorded as 19 August. His records show the last four of his SSN as “7820” and were incorrectly reflected as “7280,”...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013204

    Original file (20110013204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect the second digit of his Social Security Number (SSN) as a “7” instead of an “8,” as currently reflected. The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that his SSN contains an “8” as the second digit and should reflect a “7.” 3. The applicant served all of his military service using an SSN containing a “7” as the second digit and it appears...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006955

    Original file (20100006955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He departed Korea on 29 June 1966 for assignment to Vietnam. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD reflects that his SSN ended in the digit "8" and that he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * Aircraft Crewman Badge * Air Medal with 3rd OLC * Army Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) 6. The applicant served in Korea from June 1965 to July 1966 and is therefore entitled to the KDSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004898

    Original file (20120004898.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the last digit of his social security number (SSN) as "4" and to show his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and Air Medal (AM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) is awarded for honorable active service for any period between 27 July 1950 and 27 July 1954, 1 January 1961 and 14 August 1974, 2 August 1990...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010186

    Original file (20110010186.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect that his Social Security Number (SSN) has an “8” in the sixth digit instead of a “9.” 2. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that the sixth digit of his SSN is a “9” when in fact it is an “8.” 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024552

    Original file (20110024552.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that the last four digits of his Social Security Number (SSN) are “1498.” 2. The applicant states that his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that the last four digits of his SSN are “6040”, when in fact they are “1498.” 3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018273

    Original file (20110018273.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) incorrectly reflects that the third digit of his SSN is a "3" instead of a "4." At the time of his induction he was issued an Army Service Number and he provided his SSN, which contained a "4" as the third digit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021116

    Original file (20110021116.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that a typographical error occurred when his DD Form 214 was prepared to reflect that the first digit of his SSN was a “2” instead of a “3.” 3. He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that the first digit of his SSN was a “2.” 4. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the SSN contained in block 3 (SSN)...