Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023765
Original file (20110023765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  24 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023765 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

The applicant requests award of the Air Medal (AM).

2.  The applicant states the AM was awarded for every 25 hours flown and his records show he flew more.
   

3.  The applicant provides:

* DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Light Certificate)
* Hazardous Duty Pay Orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 1971.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairman).

3.  He served in Vietnam from 25 June 1972 through 10 February 1973, at which time he was reassigned to Fort Campbell, Kentucky for duty.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was promoted to specialist five
(SP5/E-5) on 17 May 1972, and this was the highest rank he obtained.

4.  On 29 August 1974, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his remaining service obligation.  He completed 3 years of creditable active duty service.

5.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he earned the following awards during his tenure on active duty:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with bronze service star
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960
* Bronze Star Medal
* Overseas Service Bar
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M-16 Rifle Bar

6.  His service records do not contain orders awarding him the AM.

7.  The DD Form 759 provided by the applicant shows he completed 59 flight hours from July 1972 through January 1973.  It does not show the type or number of missions flown.

8.  The Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 failed to reveal any AM orders for the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal 
recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

10.  U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the AM.  It established that passenger personnel who did not participate in an air assault were not eligible for the award based upon sustained operations.  It defined terms and provided guidelines for the award based upon the number and types of missions or hours.

	a.  Twenty-five Category I missions (air assault and equally dangerous missions) and accrual of a minimum of 25 hours of flight time while engaged in Category I missions was the standard established for which sustained operations were deemed worthy of recognition by an award of the AM.  However, the regulation was clear that these guidelines were considered only a departure point.

	b.  To be recommended for award of the Air Medal, an individual must have completed a minimum of 25 category I missions, 50 category II missions, or     100 category III missions.  Because various types of missions would have been completed in accumulating flight time toward award of an Air Medal for sustained operations, different computations would have had to be made to combine category I, II, and III flight times and adjust it to a common denominator.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There are no general orders available that show the applicant was awarded the AM.  The governing regulation requires a formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders for award of the AM.  In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm he completed the number of missions necessary to be awarded the AM, the evidence he provides is not sufficient to correct his record to show award of the AM.

2.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.









BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X  ___  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023765





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023765



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005294

    Original file (20130005294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 December 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130005294 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). While it is clear that the applicant flew 1,058 hours of combat time as a pilot, the DA Form 759-1 only shows 23 combat missions flown in July 1971.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004780C070206

    Original file (20050004780C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He continues that based on the rule that an Air Medal is awarded for every 25 hours flown in combat time, he is authorized an additional 26 awards of the Air Medal. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003720

    Original file (20120003720.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also during his service in Vietnam he completed various combat missions. His DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record - Army Aviator) shows the following entries with respect to flight time (but it does not show the Mission IDs): Month/Year Hours Flown August 1965 0 September 1965 0 October 1965 17.4 November 1965 3.3 December 1965 6.8 January 1966 11 February 1966 19.7 March 1966 40.4 April 1966 45.4 May 1966 25.2 June 1966 30 July 1966 14.3 Total Flying Hours 213.5 8. U.S. Army Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057870C070420

    Original file (2001057870C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded 30 additional awards of the Air Medal (AM). United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided guidelines for awarding the AM during the Vietnam Conflict based on the types of missions and total hours flown. Therefore, the Board concludes the applicant is entitled to one award of the AM for every 25 hours of combat flight time he accrued and based on his having accrued a total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015717

    Original file (20140015717.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he believes the Air Medal was requested around April 1971 but he never received it * he tried to correct his records in 1974 but again did not receive the award * in August 1974 he contacted the former Operations Officer for the unit with which he served in Vietnam; the Operations Officer had submitted the recommendation for the applicant's Air Medal * the Operations Officer provided a statement affirming the applicant's Air Medal had been requested * he is a life...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005189

    Original file (20090005189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he located the orders that awarded him the Bronze Star Medal and his flight record that shows he completed 240 hours of combat flying time by 30 June 1969 which should qualify him for additional oak leaf clusters for his Air Medal. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 12870, dated 9 October 1969, show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 1 December 1968 to 31 July 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. To...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080169C070215

    Original file (2002080169C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Air Medal or the Air Medal with "V" Device as authorized awards. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show three awards of the Air Medal (correctly known as the Air Medal with Numeral "3"). Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000378

    Original file (20090000378.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that he is entitled to award of the Air Medal for he served in the Republic of Vietnam and had approximately 200 to 400 flight hours as an aircraft crewman. However, there is no evidence in the applicant's available OMPF that shows he was recommended or awarded the Air Medal during his foreign service tour in the Republic of Vietnam. As such, there is insufficient evidence to show that the applicant should be awarded the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001055088C070420

    Original file (2001055088C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, since there is no record of how many missions the applicant flew on those days, the Board must default to one mission per day. Using the number of days the applicant flew (256) divided by the standard of 25 combat missions, the Board concludes that the applicant should be awarded 10 Air Medals. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant was awarded the Air Medal for Valor with Numeral 10, to denote the award of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018379

    Original file (20140018379.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the number of Air Medals was miscalculated * he was awarded the Air Medal (1st through 6th Award) * his flight hours in the Republic of Vietnam were 1,193 as a first pilot and 337 as an aircraft commander 3. He participated in various combat missions during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Air Medal with Numeral 16 and...