Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023721
Original file (20110023721.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  17 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023721 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and any other awards to which he is authorized.

2.  The applicant states the AGCM orders were not received until his last day of service and the AGCM was not added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his AGCM orders and his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 July 1971 for a period of 3 years.  He completed basic training at Fort Knox, Kentucky; advanced individual training at Fort Sill, Oklahoma; and airborne training at Fort Benning, Georgia; before being transferred to Fort Bragg, North Carolina, for his first and only duty assignment.

3.  On 3 July 1974, General Orders Number 469 issued by Headquarters, 82d Airborne Division, awarded the applicant the AGCM.  There is no evidence in the available records to show he is entitled to any additional awards.

4.  On 26 July 1974, he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to the expiration of his term of service.  He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 28 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Parachutist Badge, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides that information contained on the DD Form 214 will be obtained from official documents contained in official records at the time of separation.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his award of the AGCM should be added to his DD Form 214 has been noted and is found to have merit.  The applicant was awarded the AGCM and it was omitted from his DD Form 214 at the time of his separation.

2.  Accordingly, his DD Form 214 should be corrected by adding the award of the AGCM at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding award of the AGCM (1st Award) to his DD Form 214.



      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023721



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023721



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016979

    Original file (20090016979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090016979 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states that he believes that he should have received the award of the AGCM and just learned that many of the people he served with received their award of the AGCM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 8 February 1971...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004510

    Original file (20120004510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he completed airborne training and was awarded the Parachutist Badge and neither are reflected on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected by awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023833

    Original file (20100023833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records show that he received excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his record is void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the AGCM. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026336

    Original file (20100026336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090004554 on 28 July 2009. The applicant served during a qualifying period for award of the NDSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 21 July 1961...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011534

    Original file (20110011534.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders Number 12775 issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division on 7 October 1969 awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 6 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Purple Heart, and the Air Medal. The applicant served in three campaigns while in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025030

    Original file (20110025030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and all other unit awards authorized be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). After carefully examining the applicant's record of service, it appears the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 15 September 1966 through 12 September 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010253

    Original file (20080010253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a self-authored statement, airborne physical qualification document, and DD Form 214 in support of his application. However, the evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that confirm his qualification with the weapons in question, or that show he was ever awarded marksmanship badges for qualification with these weapons by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020404

    Original file (20120020404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period 1953 to 1956 be corrected to show that he is awarded additional awards of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM), Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR), United Nations Service Medal (UNSM), and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). Personnel awarded the Korean Service Medal automatically establish eligibility for the UNSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006817

    Original file (20130006817.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The applicant served in two campaigns in Vietnam and he is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002368

    Original file (20090002368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to reflect his awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and the Air Medal (AM) and that he be issued those medals. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the Board determined that this error should be corrected and the applicant should receive the AGCM at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...