Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023396
Original file (20110023396.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023396 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests disability retirement.  

2.  The applicant states she was improperly denied the opportunity to be evaluated through the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) based on being within a year of retirement.  

3.  The applicant provides the 8 enclosures listed in the attachment list included with her application in support of her request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 22 June 2000, the applicant was notified that she had completed the necessary qualifying service and was eligible to receive retired pay upon reaching age 60 upon application.  

3.  On 3 October 2004, while serving as a member of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), Army Nurse Corps, in the rank of colonel, the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.

4.  A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 16 January 2007, shows the applicant was treated for neck pain and received physical therapy while in a medical hold status.  The applicant reported that she fell off a bus while wearing all of her issued equipment and she was receiving pain medication while in Iraq.  She further stated she received physical therapy and traction at Fort Bliss, Texas, and that a C-spine film showed degenerative disc and joint disease.  

5.  She served on active duty 2 years, 4 months, and 6 days until being honorably released from active duty 8 February 2007and returned to her USAR unit.

6.  On 15 October 2007, the applicant voluntarily transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), Individual Ready Reserve.  

7.  A DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 4 May 2009, shows the applicant was assigned a permanent (P) 333111 profile, which lists a P3 in the areas of physical, upper extremities and lower extremities.  The DA Form 3349 shows the applicant remained eligible to complete the alternate Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT).   

8.  On 28 January 2010, the USAR Command Surgeon completed a DD Form 3349 that indicated the applicant was assigned a "P" physical profile of 333122 with 3's in the physical, upper extremities, and lower extremities, and that she did not meet medical fitness standards.  

9.  On 2 February 2010, the office of the USAR Command Surgeon forwarded the applicant a copy of the 28 January 2010 DD Form 3349.

10.  On 4 May 2010, the Chief, Patient Administration, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri, informed the applicant that by regulation a Soldier will not be referred to the PDES when they are being processed for separation or retirement within 12 months.  

11.  On 31 May 2010, the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to reaching maximum age.

12.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) governs medical fitness standards which includes medical fitness standards for retention and separation, including retirement.  Paragraph 9-10 contains guidance on disposition of unfit Reservists.  It states, in pertinent part, that normally Reservists who do not meet fitness standards will be transferred to the Retired Reserve if eligible.  Any PDES processing is for fitness determinations only.  

13.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or
Separation) establishes the Army PDES according to the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), Chapter 61, (10 USC 61) and Department of Defense Directive 1332.18.  It sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.  

14.  Paragraph 3-2 of the PDES regulation outlines specific presumptions for separation or retirement from active service.  It states disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.  When a Soldier is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement creates a presumption that the Soldier is fit.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for disability retirement has been carefully considered.  However, after reviewing all of the evidence provided by the applicant, there is insufficient evidence to support her claim.  

2.  By law and regulation, when a Reservist is unfit he/she will be transferred to the Retired Reserve if eligible and when a Soldier is being processed for separation or retirement for reasons other than physical disability continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation or retirement creates a presumption that the Soldier is fit.  

3.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant was within 12 months of mandatory transfer to the Retired Reserve based on maximum age requirements when it was determined she did not meet medical fitness standards.  As a result, there was a presumption of fitness attached to her continued performance of duty in the USAR subsequent to the end of her active duty service on 8 February 2007.  

4.  There is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X__ _  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023396



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023396



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009899

    Original file (20090009899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 13 September 2007, the applicant requested an honorable discharge from the USAR based upon the non-duty related medical disqualification. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019324

    Original file (20090019324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. Although the applicant contends he should have gone through medical processing since his injury occurred on active duty, the available evidence shows his medical condition did not render him medically unfit or unable to meet retention...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017372

    Original file (20140017372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's records that indicates he was found unfit to perform his military duties due to an unfitting medical condition prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he/she must be unable to perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank or rating. The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002359

    Original file (20110002359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states all Soldiers with physical profiles of 3 or 4 in any of the 6 functional capacity factors will appear before a Military Occupational Specialty/ Medical Retention Board (MMRB). The applicant provides: * her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 21 October 2010 * a memorandum from Tripler Army Medical Center (TAMC), HI, Orthopaedic/Podiatry Surgery Service, dated 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013310

    Original file (20130013310.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 11-343-00044 (transferring her to the Retired Reserve) * Medical Record Review memorandum, dated 14 June 2011 * Notification of Medical Retention Board Referral, dated 20 July 2010 * Army Reserve Personnel Command (ARPC) Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) * DA Forms 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 11 November 2011, 15 July 2005, 4 August 2006 * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records, notes,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015881

    Original file (20130015881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A memorandum, dated 24 February 2004, from Headquarters, 81st RRC to Commander TTHS stated the Command Surgeon had reviewed the applicant's medical records and determined her medical condition was medically unacceptable. A Soldier with a non-duty related medical condition may request a PEB; however, the PEB would only determine fitness for duty. In view of the above, she was properly processed for separation in accordance with USAR regulations and she is not entitled to a discharge with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017064

    Original file (20140017064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her records to show she is authorized to retain her Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) offered at the time of her enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 28 December 2006; and b. correction of her records to allow her to retain the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive in the amount of $20,000.00; and c. voidance of her reassignment orders to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR), dated 31 October 2011. She was erroneously...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003539

    Original file (20150003539.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 24 August 2007, she was evaluated by the Mental Health Clinic and received a physical profile rating of 3 in the psychiatric factor for PTSD. Service members who are determined to be unfit for duty due to disability are either separated from the military or are permanently retired, depending on the severity of the disability and length of military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. having the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026814

    Original file (20100026814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), on 18 February 1987 for a period of 8 years. The various medical documents he provides show he was seen or evaluated in 2008, 2009, or 2010, after his release from active duty. His medical profiles and PHA occurred after his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021708

    Original file (20120021708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She was found unfit due to sleep apnea and knee pain, but she would have like to have had a board review all her illnesses that occurred while serving as a National Guard member. Medical documents show she had twisted, sprained, or otherwise injured her left knee twice while on active duty and once after her enlistment in the GAARNG. This profile also states that she did not need a PEB.