Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023264
Original file (20110023264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023264 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states he was not awarded the PH he was told he would receive for his wounds.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  This case is being considered using the NPRC reconstructed record which primarily consists of his WD AGO Form 53-55 and the documents provided by the applicant.

3.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 26 February 1943 and entered active service on 5 March 1943.  It also shows he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 776 (Radio Operator Low Speed) and he served in the Asiatic Pacific Theater of Operations (APT) from 27 September 1943 to 26 November 1945.  It further shows in:

	a.  Item 33 (Decorations and Awards) the:

* World War II Victory Medal
* Asiatic Pacific Campaign Medal
* Philippine Liberation Medal
* Army Good Conduct Medal

	b.  Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action) the entry "None."

4.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 also shows he was honorably discharged from active duty on 17 December 1945, having completed 2 years, 3 months, and
3 days of total active service.

5.  There are no documents in the reconstructed NPRC record that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority 
while serving on active duty.  There are also no medical treatment records or hospital reports on file that indicate he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury during his active duty tenure.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to awarding the PH.  It states that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound was treated by medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the PH.

2.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

3.  The available evidence of record fails to document he was wounded in action or treated for a combat-related wound or injury by medical personnel.  There is also no available evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.

4.  Absent documentary evidence to corroborate the applicant's claim, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support correction of his record to show award of the PH has not been met in this case.

5.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023264





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023264



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008265

    Original file (20140008265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides: a. The evidence shows that the FSM’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the ARBA CMD administratively correct the records of the former service member concerned by: * awarding him the Bronze Star Medal based upon award of the Combat Infantryman Badge for service in World War II from 4 October 1943 to 2 September 1945 * adding to item 33 of the FSM's WD AGO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009029

    Original file (20080009029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that an individual was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action; required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Absent any evidence that that the FSM was wounded as a result of enemy action, and/or that he was treated for a combat-related wound or injury by military medical personnel, or that he was ever recommended for or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007017

    Original file (20100007017.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military record is not available to the Board for review. She provides no military medical treatment records or service records related to the FSM's WWII medical treatment for any injuries received in combat or his military service awards. The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55, item 34, contains the entry "none" indicating the FSM was not wounded in action during WWII.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050010528C070206

    Original file (20050010528C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized for each campaign a member was credited with participating in while serving in the PTO. The omission of these awards from his record and separation document is an administrative matter that does not require Board action to correct. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the World War II Victory Medal and 1 bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006402C070206

    Original file (20050006402C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM’s separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55) contains the entry “AP Theater 24 Mar 44” in Item 34 (Wounds Received in Action), and that while the FSM was hospitalized for his war wounds, the PH was awarded to him by a general officer (GO). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014669C071029

    Original file (20060014669C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The evidence also confirms the applicant was awarded the CIB, for which he received combat infantry pay, while serving in the PTO. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in the Pacific Theater of Operations on 16 June 1945, and the Bronze Star Medal for his exemplary conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016907

    Original file (20080016907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy while serving in the Pacific Theater of Operations from 12 June 1944 to 2 September 1945 and providing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090049C070212

    Original file (2003090049C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The shrapnel was removed from his chest and he returned to duty on an unknown date in November 1943. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the PH, WWII Victory Medal, BSM based on award of the CIB,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002701

    Original file (20140002701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military records are not available for review. While there is no official document that shows he was wounded as a result of enemy action and his wounds were treated and made a matter of record, the newspaper article provided by the applicant tends to suggest that he was, in fact, awarded the Purple Heart and that through administrative oversight,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009240C070206

    Original file (20050009240C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    By regulation, in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence to show a member was wounded in action, was treated for the wound and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Given that the record confirms the applicant was wounded in action on 14 June 1944, while serving in Myitkyina, Burma, it would be appropriate to award him the PH at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...