Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023056
Original file (20110023056.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  31 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023056

THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his discharge date was no later than 31 December 2009.

2.  The applicant states he would not have taken terminal leave that extended past his normal separation date if he had known about the Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) and the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  

3.  The applicant provides:

* Email from the PDBR, dated 31 August 2011
* Letter from the PEB, dated 26 August 2009
* DA Form 1698 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment), dated 11 September 2009
  
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having prior enlisted service in the U.S. Army Reserve the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 October 2006 and held the military occupational specialty 88M (Motor Transport Operator).  

2.  His record contains discharge Orders Number 154-0003, issued by the Installation Management Command, Europe, Mannheim Transition Center, Germany, on 3 June 2009.  These orders established his date of discharge as 
16 November 2009.

3.  His record contains a DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings), dated 10 August 2009.  The PEB found him physically unfit and recommended a combined disability rating of 20 percent and separation with severance pay.  

4.  On 14 August 2009, he signed the DA Form 199, concurred with the PEB's findings and waived his rights to a formal hearing; however, on 17 August 2009, he requested to change his concurrence and waiver of rights.  He stated he did not concur with the PEB findings, demanded a formal hearing with a personal appearance, and requested counsel.

5.  He provided a letter from the U.S. Army PEB, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, dated 26 August 2009.  This letter states his formal PEB had been rescheduled to 22 September 2009.

6.  He provided a DA Form 1695, dated 11 September 2009, which shows he extended in an active duty status for 3 months, which extended his expiration term of service date from 16 November 2009 to 16 February 2010.

7.  On 8 October 2009, he sent an email to the PEB Liaison Officer (PEBLO) wherein he stated he was waiving his formal disability hearing and accepting the findings and recommendations of the initial PEB.

8.  His records contain a memorandum for the president of the PEB, wherein he stated he had been properly advised of his legal rights by the PEBLO, and thusly decided to waive his request for a formal PEB hearing.  He further stated he was in agreement with the initial informal PEB proceedings.  It appears the dates within this memorandum may be incorrect.  It is likely the memorandum was prepared on 10 September 2009.

9.  His record contains a revocation Order Number 288-0002, issued by the Host Nation Liaison Operating Activity, Mannheim Transition Center, Germany, on 
15 October 2009.  These orders revoked discharge Orders Number 154-0003.

10.  His record contains discharge Orders Number 288-0005, issued by the Host Nation Liaison Operating Activity, Mannheim Transition Center, Germany, on 
15 October 2009.  These orders established his date of discharge as 12 January 2010, and show he was awarded a 20 percent disability rating and he was authorized severance pay.

11.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 12 January 2010.  His 
DD Form 214 lists his narrative reason for separation as "disability, severance pay, non-combat related."  

12.  In an email that he sent to the PDBR on 9 August 2011 he stated he had been discharged from active duty on 12 January 2010, his PEB was completed on September 2009, and he had taken terminal leave from October 2009 until his date of discharge.  He stated that 3 months prior to his discharge date he extended to allow him time to complete a formal PEB, which he later found he did not need.  He informed the PDBR that he had received a 20 percent disability rating from the Regular Army and asked if he could apply to the PDBR for consideration.

13.  The PDBR responded to his inquiry on 31 August 2011 and essentially informed him that he was not qualified for consideration because he was discharged outside of the eligibility dates established by the National Defense Authorization Act of 2008, which states in U.S. Code (USC), Title 10, subtitle A, part II, chapter 79, section 1554a that only personnel who were separated from military service from 11 September 2001 to 31 December 2009 are eligible for consideration by the PDBR.

14.  USC, Title 10, subtitle A, part II, chapter 79, section 1554a states the Secretary of Defense shall establish within the Office of the Secretary of Defense a board of review to review the disability determinations of covered individuals by Physical Evaluation Boards.  The board shall be known as the “Physical Disability Board of Review.”  The Physical Disability Board of Review shall consist of not less than three members appointed by the Secretary.  Covered individuals are members and former members of the armed forces who, during the period beginning on 11 September 2001, and ending on 31 December 2009 are separated from the armed forces due to unfitness for duty due to a medical condition with a disability rating of 20 percent disabled or less, and are found to be not eligible for retirement. 

15.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that item 12 (Record of Service) should be completed using extreme care since post-service benefits, final pay, retirement credit, and so forth are based on this information.  Further, item 12b (Separation Date This Period) is the Soldier’s transition date.  This date may not be the contractual date if Soldier is separated early, voluntarily extends, or is extended for make-up of lost time, or retained on active duty for the convenience of the Government.

16.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 1-29 (Effective Date of Discharge) states the discharge of a Soldier is effective at 2400 on the date of release when the Soldier is transferred to the USAR to complete a reserve obligation, transferred to the temporary disability 

retired list, for a Soldier who entered active duty from a Reserve Component and reverts to USAR or State ARNG control, release is effective at 2400 on the date of expiration of authorized travel time, and discharge for all reasons other than those set forth above is effective at 2400 on the date of notice of discharge to the Soldier.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant essentially requests his date of discharge be changed to 
31 December 2009 so that he would be eligible for a PDBR.  He argues that he would not have taken transition leave past his normal separation date if he had known about the PDBR.

2.  Records are not corrected solely for the purpose of making an applicant eligible for veterans or other benefits, programs, or boards.  Every case is individually decided based upon its merits when an applicant makes a request.

3.  There is no evidence nor has the applicant provided evidence to show his discharge date was administratively incorrect.  His discharge date was based upon an extension that he requested.  Further, he signed this extension, and he signed his DD Form 214 indicating that the information was correct.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X  ___  ___X ___  ____X___  DENY APPLICATION











BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022846



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023056



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000368

    Original file (20150000368.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 January 2003, a medical evaluation board (MEB) convened, and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations, the MEB found the applicant was diagnosed as having the medically-unacceptable condition of bilateral thigh and leg pain. On 3 March 2006, an informal PEB convened and found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and military specialty and determined that he was physically unfit due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022435

    Original file (20120022435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 August 2012, the OGC requested through the Fort Belvoir RSO to the USAPDA an extension of his mobilization orders from 29 October 2012 until 25 February 2013 for the purpose of concluding his duties with the OGC, to take 20 days of PTDY, 86 days of accrued leave and additional days to demobilize from OGC not later than 2 November 2012. c. On 4 September 2012, he contacted the Fort Belvoir RSO to ascertain the status of his request to extend his mobilization orders and was told his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001802

    Original file (20130001802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He continued his rehabilitation and/or physical therapy until March 2010 when his leg went numb and he had severe back pain. The applicant contends he should have been diagnosed with the medical conditions of PTSD and TBI at the time of his disability retirement in April 2011 and thus awarded an additional finding of unfitness and compensation. In November 2010, an informal PEB found his back condition was unfitting and rated it as 40-percent disabling.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002675

    Original file (20130002675.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. A DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) that shows on 25 May 2004 an informal PEB reviewed the applicant's DD Form 2808, dated 21 April 2004, along with his medical records and found him physically unfit due to bilateral knee pain with a history of separate injuries to both knees and degenerative arthritis. The applicant contends his records should be corrected to show he was retired due to physical disability because the MEB and PEB only considered his bilateral knee pain and failed to consider...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015854

    Original file (20140015854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The first page of a VA Rating Decision, dated 10 December 2008, that shows he was granted 30 percent service-connected disability compensation by the VA for major depressive disorder. The applicant's record is void of medical documentation that indicates he was suffering from an unfitting PTSD condition or any other unfitting medical condition during his active duty service, aside from "chronic mid-back pain and chronic neck pain." Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002892

    Original file (20110002892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He provides: * page 40 of Department of the Army Warrior Transition Unit (WTU) Consolidated Guidance, dated 18 July 2008 * Orders A-11-823251, dated 17 November 2008, ordering him to active duty for contingency operations for operational support (CO-ADOS) in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) * letter from a physician, dated 16 July 2009 * memorandum, dated 31 August 2009, regarding his MEB * Orders 301-1006, dated 28 October 2009, releasing him from active duty not by reason of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007330

    Original file (20100007330.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant completed a DD Form 2807-1 on 31 May 2006 for evaluation by a medical board. This medical document does not indicate he suffered from PTSD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008351

    Original file (20080008351.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. The evidence or record also shows that the PEB considered the applicant’s medical conditions described in his medical records and the evidence presented at that time. Based on a review of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000814

    Original file (20130000814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). She further contends the WTU instructed the Delaware Army National Guard (DEARNG) to review her promotion and complete the forms in February or March 2012. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence that shows she was ever recommended for or promoted to SSG/E-6.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007813

    Original file (20130007813.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 April 2013, he spoke with Mr. G---, PEBLO, Fort Hood, TX, who informed him that his case had been closed after three failed attempts to reach him by mail at x6xx Preston Road, Apt. The record shows the applicant was placed on the TDRL on 28 October 2009, and after subsequent reevaluation on 3 April 2012, the PEB recommended that he be removed from the TDRL and rated his disability at 10 percent. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...