Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023032
Original file (20110023032.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110023032 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests item 3 (Grade-Rate-Rank and Date of Appointment) of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be changed to show the rank of "sergeant."

2.  The applicant states:

* he was promoted to sergeant
* his promotion was approved while he was on a boat from Korea to the U.S. and a copy of it was mailed to his home address

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Special Orders Number 108, Headquarters, 31st Infantry, APO 7, dated 24 May 1955
* Photo-copy of a post-marked enveloped, dated 27 May 1955

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was inducted in the Army of the United States on 25 August 1953.  He was honorably discharged on 22 June 1955 and he was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  His DD Form 214 shows the following entries:

   a. Item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank) shows CPL (T), 19 Jan 55 (Corporal, (Temporary), 19 January 1955)

b. Item 19 shows Cleveland, OH, as the place of entry on active duty

c. Item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service), 1 year and 7 months.

   d. Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaigns Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the Korean Service Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, United Nations Service Medal, and Marksmanship Qualification Badge. 

   e. Item 28 shows his most significant duty assignment was with 31st Infantry Regiment.

f. Item 38 (Remarks) shows he had no days lost. 

4.  Special Orders Number 108, dated 24 May 1955, show the applicant was promoted to sergeant (Sgt).

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes policies and procedures regarding separation documents.  This regulation prescribes the grade, rate or rank, held by an individual at the time of his or her separation, indicating whether permanent or temporary, will be entered in item 3 of the DD Form 214.  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to have his rank changed on his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  Special orders promoted to the applicant to Sgt.  Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this promotion.

BOARD VOTE:

___X  ___  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show item 3 as "Sgt, 24 May 1955."



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023032



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110023032



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002161

    Original file (20120002161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a DA Form 160 (Application for Active Duty), dated 30 December 1955; his DD Form 214, for the period ending 7 January 1958; and his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 26 January 1959. According to TIOH, an equivalent rank/grade of SGT, during the time period he served on active duty, was SP2. Therefore, the rank shown on his DD Form 214 is correct and there is no basis to amend his DD Form 214 to show a different rank.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000384C070208

    Original file (20040000384C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 March 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040000384 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant served in the Army of the United States from 8 November 1950 to 8 August 1952.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018545

    Original file (20090018545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Republic of Korea War Service Medal (ROKWSM) is awarded to members of the U.S. Armed Forces who served in Korea and adjacent waters between 25 June 1950 and 27 July 1953. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) based on completion of a period of qualifying service of three years from 15 July 1952 through 14 July 1955. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009876

    Original file (20140009876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001722

    Original file (20130001722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a SGT at the time of his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve; however, his discharge certificate shows he was a CPL. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) * a certificate of promotion, dated 6 June 1955 * DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 20 March 1956 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000345C070206

    Original file (20050000345C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 (Grade) shows he held the rank of SP2 (T) on the date of his separation. The evidence of record confirms the applicant held the pay grade E-5 and corresponding rank of SP2 at the time of his separation from active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020468

    Original file (20110020468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the available evidence is sufficient as a basis for awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 16 May 1968 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. His service record does not show he was disqualified from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 25 October 1967 through 15 October 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011131

    Original file (20110011131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * Orders for the Bronze Star Medal with "V' Device * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-65, in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003884

    Original file (20120003884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...