Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022979
Original file (20110022979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022979 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states the ARCOM was presented to him with his Purple Heart in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 January 1969.  He arrived in Vietnam on 13 June 1969.  He served as an infantry indirect fire crewman assigned to Company E, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, 196th Infantry Brigade in Vietnam from 27 June 1969 to 12 June 1970.  On 1 October 1970, he was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 
1 year and 9 months of creditable active service with no time lost. 

3.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 
1 October 1970 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Purple Heart  

4.  Orders, dated 25 May 1970, show he received the ARCOM.

5.  There is no evidence the applicant received the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award).  There is no evidence he was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service.

6.  Records show he participated in three campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry, was cited for award of the:

* Valorous Unit Award for actions during the period 11-31 August 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated 1972
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the periods 24 August to 31 December 1969 and 31 March to 
* 30 June 1970 by DAGO Number 42, dated 1972
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the period 15 April to 28 August 1969 by DAGO Number 69, dated 1974

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, paragraph 6 (Miscellaneous information), states that not more than one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation may be worn by any individual.  Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation badge is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will show all awards received.

9.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 January 1978.  On 31 March 1978, he was honorably discharged by reason of physical disability (existed prior to service). 

10.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Purple Heart
* Valorous Unit Award  
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Two Overseas Service Bars
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) Bar
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar
* two service stripes

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon, to include the Vietnam Service Medal, for each credited campaign.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show he received the ARCOM.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978 should be corrected to show this medal.

2.  He was released from active duty on 1 October 1970 in the rank of specialist four with 21 months of creditable active service with no lost time.  His records also show he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service with no disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification.  It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 January 1969 through 1 October 1970 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978 shows one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  However, his Vietnam unit was cited for two separate awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to the unit.  Although he is entitled to wear only one of these awards, this DD Form 214 should be corrected to show both unit awards.

BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting the entry "Vietnam Cross of Gallantry w/Palm (unit)" from his 
DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978; 

	b.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 
2 January 1969 through 1 October 1970; and 



	c.  adding the ARCOM, Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 March 1978. 



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022979



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022979



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017162

    Original file (20120017162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service during the period 1 November 1970 through 20 May 1971. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 16 May 1968 through 15 May 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 for the period ending 21 May 1971 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006630

    Original file (20130006630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM in 1969 in Vietnam. As such, he is entitled to one award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 January 1969 through 20 April 1971; b. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016761

    Original file (20100016761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Presidential Unit Citation. His records do not contain a DD Form 214 for this period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 September 1978 the Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry with Palm, and b. adding to item 26 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 September 1978 the: * Presidential Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024854

    Original file (20100024854.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM. The evidence of record shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 3 February 1969 to 2 September 1970; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075571C070403

    Original file (2002075571C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Two general orders awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal are in his file -- General Orders 1868, Headquarters, U. S. Army, Europe and Seventh Army dated 16 April 1975 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 December 1969 to 13 December 1972) and General Orders 210, Headquarters, U. S. Army Field Artillery Center and Fort Sill dated 21 January 1974 (awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal third award for the period 14 December 1972 to 13 December 1975). His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016615

    Original file (20110016615.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This publication shows that the 101st Airborne Division Artillery and the 377th Artillery, during the time of the applicant's assignment, were respectfully cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated in 1970; and in DAGO Number 48, dated in 1971; for awards of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. Records show that the applicant participated in seven campaign periods during his service in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082358C070215

    Original file (2002082358C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 4 June 1971, to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and award of a second Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device. The applicant states in effect, that he is entitled to award of the CIB, since he served in a combat unit from approximately June 1970 until January 1971. The orders for his Bronze Star Medal with “V” Device identify him as a member of D Troop, 1st Squadron, 9th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010914

    Original file (20110010914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Air Medal (AM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) [2nd Award] * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device 2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 February 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011592

    Original file (20080011592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army General Order Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all personnel assigned to the United States Army Vietnam from 8 February 1962 through 28 March 1973 the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017032

    Original file (20140017032.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). The 4th Battalion, 31st Infantry Regiment, was awarded the: * Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) for actions during the period 11-31 August 1969 in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 42, dated 1971 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for actions during the period 24 August-31 December 1969 in DAGO Number 6, dated 1974 b. As a result, the Board...