Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022934
Original file (20110022934.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  22 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022934 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge.

2.  He states he went home on a pass because his mother was dying of cancer.  She passed away while he was on leave.  Her death "messed [him] up" and he started using drugs and alcohol.  He states he "just gave up."  He is requesting a general discharge because he was second in his basic combat training (BCT) class and at the top of his advanced individual training (AIT) class for military occupational specialty (MOS) 76Y (Supply Clerk) at Fort Jackson, SC.  At Fort Polk, LA, he was the unit supply clerk and unit armorer for his company and he was "getting ready to make [private first class (PFC)]/E-3]."  He states he had a good military record and he wanted to make a career of serving his country.

3.  He provides no documentary evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 March 1977.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded MOS 76Y.  His record does not contain documentation of his performance in BCT or AIT.  He was advanced to PFC/E-3 effective 1 February 1978, which was the highest grade he held.

3.  His record contains DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action) that show the following changes in his duty status:

* from ordinary leave to absent without leave (AWOL), effective 7 March 1978
* from AWOL to dropped from rolls, effective 6 April 1978
* from confined by civil authorities to present for duty, effective 12 April 1978

4.  A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 25 April 1978, shows he was charged with being AWOL from on or about 7 March to on or about 12 April 1978.

5.  On 26 April 1978, he consulted with legal counsel, who advised him of the basis for his contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and his rights.

6.  After consulting with counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In his voluntary request for discharge, he acknowledged he was guilty of the charge against him or a lesser included offense which authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He indicated he understood if his request were accepted, he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions.  He further acknowledged he understood that, as a result of the issuance of such a discharge, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration, be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws, and encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life.  He elected to submit a statement in his own behalf.


7.  The statement he submitted with his request for discharge shows, in part:

* he joined the Army because he got two young ladies pregnant
* he married one and he was paying child support to the other
* he wanted to learn a skill that was needed in civilian life and he had plans to finish his college education
* he requested a discharge because he was not earning enough money to support himself, his wife, and two children
* before he went AWOL, he "tried to get a hardship or [a] compassionate reassignment"
* he went AWOL while on emergency leave
* his mother had cancer and could never go back to work

8.  On 22 May 1978, the separation authority approved his request, directed his reduction to private (PV1)/E-1, and directed the issuance of a DD Form 794A (Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate).  On 9 July 1978, he was discharged accordingly.  His DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) shows he completed 1 year, 2 months, and 11 days of total active service with 36 days of time lost.

9.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Chapter 10 provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt.  Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for upgrade of his discharge.

2.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The record shows he was charged with and admitted he was guilty of being AWOL, an offense for which he could have been tried by court-martial and punished with a punitive discharge under the UCMJ.  All requirements of law and regulation were met, and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3.  He admitted he was guilty of being AWOL.  The record shows the separation authority did not find any mitigating factors that warranted giving him anything other than the discharge under other than honorable conditions normally considered appropriate.  Based on his record of indiscipline, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  Therefore, he is not entitled to a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022934



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022934



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011092

    Original file (20060011092.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he completed BCT, but failed AIT (Advanced Individual Training). He failed to return from an authorized leave and was charged with 1 day of AWOL. There is no record the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) seeking a discharge upgrade during that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003086674C070212

    Original file (2003086674C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: On 23 April 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. Persons discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 are given RE-3B codes.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077142C070215

    Original file (2002077142C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s discharge are not present in the available records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090241C070212

    Original file (2003090241C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This program, known as the DOD Discharge Review Program (Special) (SDRP) required, in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary, that a discharge upgrade to either honorable or general be issued in the case of any individual who had either completed a normal tour of duty in Southeast Asia, been wounded in action, been awarded a military decoration other than a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002660

    Original file (20130002660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 14 December 1979, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service – in lieu of trial by court-martial. However, at the time he requested a discharge he was advised if he received a discharge under other than honorable conditions he would: * encounter substantial...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020458

    Original file (20110020458.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. On 18 June 1981, the applicant was discharged accordingly. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473C070209

    Original file (9710473C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. The applicant further stated that after he had been denied a hardship discharge twice he saw no alternative but to go home and assist his family.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9710473

    Original file (9710473.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1968 while still in basic training the applicant applied for a hardship discharge based on his parents being in old age and in poor health, his father was suffering from terminal cancer. On 5 October 1970 the applicant’s unit commander recommended approval of the applicant’s request for discharge for the good of the service, in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022658

    Original file (20120022658.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 16 July 1970. His records contain a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 29 August 1970, that shows he was seen at the Fort Campbell dispensary on that date for a complaint of muscle pain in both legs; he also stated he had had polio. Although the applicant was seen on several occasions by medical personnel for complaints of muscle/leg pain, the evidence or record does not show and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004327C070205

    Original file (20060004327C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. He also states that his discharge should have been upgraded 6 months after he was discharged. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply there, and that this Board's exhaustion requirement (Army Regulation 15-185, paragraph 2-8), effectively shortens that filing period, has determined that the 3 year limit on...