Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022904
Original file (20110022904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  7 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022904 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.  

2.  He states he would like his status changed from noncombat casualty to combat casualty, so that he may be considered for the Purple Heart.  His unit was under fire when he fell 17 feet and had to be medically evacuated on 
21 December 1967.  

3.  He listed his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) claim number along with his social security number for the Board to obtain necessary records in support of his request.

4.  He did not provide any additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  He was appointed a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 
3 October 1961 and entered active duty that date.  After the completion of training, he served as a Field Artillery Unit Commander.  

3.  Item 17 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record) shows, in part, he served in Vietnam during two periods:

* From 20 July 1967 through 14 January 1968
* From 21 December 1969 through 14 December 1970 

4.  The applicant's DA Form 66 also shows him in a patient status from 
30 December 1967 to 24 March 1968 in item 18 (Record of Assignments).  

5.  His record does not contain any documentation to show he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. 

6.  The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster nor does his military personnel record contain any documentation to show he was injured in combat, as a result of hostile action.

7.  His military medical record is not available for review. 

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Purple Heart.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required medical treatment, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-2 outlines the functions of the ABCMR.  It states that the ABCMR will decide cases on the evidence of record.  It is not an investigative body.  Paragraph 2-9 contains guidance on the burden of proof.  It states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His request for correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record.

2.  By regulation, it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded as a result of hostile action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment of the wound must have been made a matter of official record in order to award the Purple Heart.  

3.  The applicant did not provide any evidence and his record is void of documentation to support his request.  As a result, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the Purple Heart has not been satisfied in this case.  Additionally, the applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam casualty roster.

4.  By regulation the ABCMR begins it consideration of each case with a presumption of regularity.  The burden of proving otherwise rests with the applicant.  Further, the ABCMR is not an investigative body and considers cases based on the evidence and records that are provided.  If the applicant has copies of his military medical records, VA medical records, or any other records or documents that pertain to the issue, he may resubmit his application for reconsideration.   

5.  In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis on which to grant the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x__  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022904





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022904



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012209

    Original file (20080012209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was promoted to the rank of SP4. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. However, there is no evidence in his military records that shows he was recommended for promotion to SP4 and approved by the promotion authority.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013304

    Original file (20080013304.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records contain a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record). U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart. The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he sustained a wound to his left shoulder on 8 October 1966 while serving in the RVN and this information is recorded in Item 40 of his DA Form 20.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022561

    Original file (20110022561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military medical record is not available for review. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. His request for correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the available evidence of record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013325

    Original file (20080013325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's service personnel record contains a Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care) which shows he was treated on 11 October 1967 for second degree burns to his fingers on his left hand. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. ________XXX______________ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012068

    Original file (20090012068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20080009738, on 16 December 2008. The applicant provided a copy of a letter from a combat medic who stated that as a medic in the Republic of Vietnam, he remembered the applicant being wounded by shrapnel. In the absence of medical records that show the applicant was treated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020619

    Original file (20140020619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty roster and his complete service medical records are also not available for review with this case. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence to show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that treatment was made a matter of official record for award of the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. _____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018530

    Original file (20080018530.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that shows he was recommended for award of the Purple Heart. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010420C071113

    Original file (20060010420C071113.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Purple Heart was not included in the list of authorized awards contained on the applicant’s DD Form 214. This medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 15 March 1967 in the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012139

    Original file (20100012139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was wounded while serving in Vietnam and if there is evidence to show this, he would like his records corrected to show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not provide any evidence which shows he was ever wounded or treated for wounds sustained as the result of hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for such wounds,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006922

    Original file (20140006922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and was wounded on his left foot, on 2 May 1968, by shrapnel from an incoming mortar and the medical treatment is recorded in his medical records. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. In order to support awarding a member the Purple Heart, it is necessary to establish the wound for which the award is being made required...