Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022600
Original file (20110022600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  10 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022600 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show he elected not to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) and a refund of monies already deducted from his retired pay for RCSBP coverage.

2.  The applicant states he never filed for SBP, he is single, and he believes someone made an administrative mistake.

3.  The applicant provides a Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Retiree Account Statement.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records shows he was born on 20 November 1948.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 October 1982.  He served in staff and leadership positions and attained the rank of sergeant first class (SFC).

2.  On 23 February 1991, U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), St. Louis, MO, issued him a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty-Year Letter).  This memorandum notified him that he had completed the required years of service and he would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60.



3.  There is no indication he made an RCSBP election at that time.  This operated to defer his election until such time as he reached age 60 and applied for retired pay.

4.  He was discharged from the USAR on 10 March 2003.  Orders Number AHRC-PAP-T, dated 27 February 2009, issued by HRC-St Louis, placed him on the Retired List in the rank of SFC effective 20 November 2008.

5. In the processing of this case DFAS was contacted to verify if and when the applicant made an SBP election.  By email, dated 28 December 2011, a DFAS representative stated the applicant indicted he was his own spouse and forwarded the applicant's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Pay), dated 9 February 2009. This form shows in:

* Section VII (Federal Income Tax Withholding Information), block 14 (Martial Status), he checked the "Single" block
* Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence), block 32 (Spouse), the applicant signed his own name and had his signature notarized 9 February 2009

6.  The applicant provides his retiree account statement, dated 29 January 2011, wherein it shows a monthly SBP deduction for "spouse only" coverage in the amount of $117.98 is being deducted from his retired pay.  This statement also shows his federal withholding status as "single, 0 exemptions."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears the applicant was single at the time he completed DD Form 2656.  It also appears he did not receive the proper guidance when completing his application for retired pay and inadvertently made an error when he placed his signature in block 32 of this form listing his name as his spouse instead of leaving it blank.  

2.  This error was compounded when DFAS processed his retired pay to show he elected "spouse only" SBP coverage and deducted the coverage from his retired pay.  As the applicant was single at that time, this was not a valid election.

3.  In view of the foregoing, his record should be corrected to show he did not make an SBP election at the time he applied for retired pay.





BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he did not make an SBP election at time he was placed on the Retired List and he be paid any monies already deducted from his retired pay for SBP coverage.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022600





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022600



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007559

    Original file (20120007559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 April 2011, by letter to DFAS, the applicant stated: * She had enclosed the necessary documentation DFAS requested regarding the FSM's death * She had been informed the last retirement payment would be made via direct deposit, and further payments would be terminated due to the FSM's death * She understood she was not entitled to compensation regarding his retirement pay because she was not his dependent * She was designated as his natural insurable interest SBP beneficiary on his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006862

    Original file (20070006862.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he elected to participate in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) for spouse coverage. By law, a member who was not married upon becoming eligible to participate in the RCSBP, but who later marries may elect to participate in the RCSBP. In this case, the FSM and applicant were married on 13 June 1992.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011701

    Original file (20110011701.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 8 December 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110011701 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He was asked about his SBP election at that time and he elected spouse coverage. The evidence of record shows the first time the applicant requested a change to his RCSBP election to spouse coverage was when he applied for retired pay on 11 March 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017685

    Original file (20130017685.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The letter stated: * she was entitled to participate in the RCSBP * she had 90 calendar days from the date she received the letter to submit a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) * if she did not submit her election within 90 calendar days, she would not be entitled to SBP coverage until she applied for retired pay at age 60 3. She also provides: a. a Retiree Account Statement, dated 23 July 2013, showing SBP costs in the amount of $311.87 were deducted from her retired pay for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016008

    Original file (20080016008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 2656-2 (Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Termination Request) dated 1 August 2005 be accepted as the correct and official date he requested to terminate coverage and that all SBP and Reserve Component SBP (RCSBP) costs and overcharges as listed on his November 2005 and September 2007 Retiree Account Statements be refunded. Therefore, the applicant's 1 August 2005 DD Form 2656-2 is accepted as sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015598

    Original file (20130015598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656-9 (SBP and RCSBP Open Enrollment Election), dated 25 January 2006, shows he elected spouse-only coverage. He provided a letter from DFAS, dated 12 July 2013, which states: * their records indicate he elected RCSBP child coverage on his DD Form 1883 on 7 February 1988 * at that time he was not married * on his original DD Form 2656 he elected SBP for his spouse and he indicated his marriage occurred on 19 May 1989 * there is a 1-year window of eligibility * notification, along...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024346

    Original file (20100024346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows the applicant executed an SBP Election Certificate on 18 August 1994 electing immediate coverage under option C for children-only coverage upon receipt of his 20-year letter. At that time, his election would have been sent to HRC because DFAS had not yet established a retired pay account as he was still under the age of 60. In this case, the applicant and his spouse were married on 30 August 1996.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006089

    Original file (20080006089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her records be corrected to show she did not elect Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage. He states that both he and the applicant made the decision not to elect coverage, but that he signed the DD Form 2656 one day prior to the applicant. Public Law 95-397, the Reserve Component SBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017911

    Original file (20120017911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states DFAS informed him in November 2011 that DFAS had not received his initial SBP election dated in 1992 until June 2011. On 13 October 2011, DFAS wrote a letter to the applicant informing him that his SBP coverage was changed from spouse only to an insurable-interest person based on his DD Form 1883. Accordingly, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records by voiding his DD Form 1883 and showing his initial SBP election was made in conjunction with his 2002...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013510

    Original file (20090013510.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In Part V (SBP Election) on this form, the FSM indicated that he was married and did not have dependent children. Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. Considering there is evidence to show it was the FSM's intent to provide SBP coverage for the applicant, it would be appropriate, as a matter of...