Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022578
Original file (20110022578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022578 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and that other awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states he was a good Soldier.  He notes that the photograph of himself in uniform as a private first class (PFC) shows unit citations and  marksmanship badges that were not listed on his DD 214.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a photograph and his DD Form 214 to support he application., 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  He enlisted on 12 December 1972 and completed training as an infantryman at Fort Carson, CO.

3.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows in:

* Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) – he was advanced to specialist four (E-4) on 1 April 1974 and promoted to sergeant (E-5) on 30 June 1975
* Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) – lists only the National Defense Service Medal

4.  The DA Form 20 lists neither marksmanship qualifications nor weapon firing scores.

5.  On 3 December 1975, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve.  His DD Form 214 shows his awards as the National Defense Service Medal.  

6.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

7.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and Insignia) states unit awards are authorized for permanent wear by individuals who were assigned and present for duty at any time during the period cited or who was attached to and present for duty with the unit for at least 30 consecutive days of the period cited.  Individuals who were not present during the period cited may be authorized temporary wear only during assignment to the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  There is no commander's recommendation for the Army Good Conduct Medal.  However, the fact that he completed a 3-year tour of stateside, peacetime duty (The Vietnam Ceasefire Campaign ended 28 January 1973) as a sergeant (E-5) and the complete absence of evidence of any disqualifying factor suggest that his not receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal was an administrative oversight.  He should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and it should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  Unfortunately, there is no record of the applicant's weapons qualifications

3.  Given the place and circumstance of the applicant's service it is probable that he was authorized temporary wear of unit awards while  assigned to the unit.

4.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to rectify this injustice by correcting the applicant’s records as recommended below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 22 December 1972 through 3 December 1975 and it should be added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to listing any other awards on his DD Form 214.  




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022578





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022578



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018431

    Original file (20100018431.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. Records or orders were not received by the personnel office in time to reflect the ARCOM in his discharge records. The version of Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) in effect at the time of the applicant's service stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003416

    Original file (20130003416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with one oak leaf cluster (1OLC). Although the applicant has not provided and the records do not contain orders awarding him the BSM with 1OLC, he has provided the Certificate and Citation along with an official Army photograph showing that he was awarded a BSM on 30 September 1971. The applicant served in three...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022258

    Original file (20100022258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which show he was awarded or recommended for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021460

    Original file (20110021460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110004076 on 13 September 2011. While there are no orders in the applicant’s available records awarding him the ARCOM, the photograph depicting him as a SGT receiving some type of an award in formation along with the original citation is sufficient evidence to justify his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091821C070212

    Original file (2003091821C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. There is no credible evidence of record, or evidence provided by the applicant, to show that he was ever wounded as a result of enemy action and authorized an award of the Purple Heart or that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021940

    Original file (20120021940.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence to show the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 12 November 1968 through 16 June 1970; b. deleting the entry "CIVILIAN EDUCATION: 10 yrs" from item 30 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "CIVILIAN EDUCATION: 12 Yrs;" and c. adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020416

    Original file (20090020416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests a. reconsideration of his previous application for correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), and b. correction of his record to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation [now known as the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC)]. In the absence of evidence showing he was assigned to HHB, 2d Infantry Division Artillery during the period for which the unit was awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005702

    Original file (20090005702.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's contention he was awarded the EFMB and the photograph he provided in which he claims he is wearing his award of the EFMB was carefully considered. In the absence of corroborating evidence showing entitlement to the EFMB, the photograph in itself is insufficient evidence in which to grant the applicant's requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461

    Original file (20100010461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006911

    Original file (20090006911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was awarded a marksmanship qualification badge. The applicant’s records are not available. Those records that are available do not show orders for a marksmanship qualification badge.