Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022549
Original file (20110022549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022549 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his awards and decorations, including:

* two Army Commendation Medals (ARCOM) – one for heroism and one for meritorious service
* two Air Medals (AM)

2.  The applicant states he wants to set the record straight.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision
* General Orders Number 7929, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Vietnam, awarding him the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroism on 4 June 1968
* ARCOM with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) Citation for the period January 1968 to December 1968
* General Orders Number 9297, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Vietnam, awarding him the AM for the period 17 April 1968 to 14 September 1968
* AM Citation for the period 17 April 1968 to 14 September 1968
* letter from a former comrade-in-arms, dated 27 January 2006

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years on 3 August 1967.  He was trained as a light weapons infantryman and served in Vietnam from on or about 8 December 1967 to on or about 1 January 1969 with Company A, 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division.

3.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 1 August 1969.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal (VSM)
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* "VCM W/60 Dvc" (Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960))
* "ACM W/V Dvc" (ARCOM with "V" Device)
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* "VN Unit Cit"
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
* First Class Gunner (Sharpshooter) Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60)
* First Class Gunner (Sharpshooter) Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar (M-16)

4.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, revealed the following orders pertaining to the applicant:

* General Orders Number 11346, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Vietnam, awarding him the ARCOM with 1st OLC
* General Orders Number 366, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Vietnam, awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 11 December 1968

5.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This pamphlet shows the 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry, was cited for award of the:

* Presidential Unit Citation for the period 7-22 March 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) 60, dated 1969
* Valorous Unit Award for the period 1-3 February 1968 by DAGO 42, dated 1969
* three Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citations for the periods –

* 1 December 1966-30 June 1968 by DAGO 31, dated 1969
* 1 July-13 November 1968 by DAGO 31, dated 1969
* January-June 1969 by DAGO 59, dated 1969

* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1966 to 28 June 1969 by DAGO 59, dated 1969

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal.  A silver service star is authorized in lieu of five bronze service stars.  The applicant served in Vietnam during the following five campaigns:

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III, 1 June 1967-29 January 1968
* Tet Counteroffensive, 30 January-1 April 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV, 2 April-30 June 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V, 1 July-1 November 1968
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI, 2 November 1968-22 February 1969

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 already shows his ARCOM with "V" Device.  Orders awarded him a second ARCOM for meritorious service, thus he is entitled to a correction to his DD Form 214 to show ARCOM (2nd Award) with "V" Device.

2.  The applicant provided general orders awarding him one AM; therefore, he is entitled to have the AM added to his DD Form 214.  However, no orders for additional AM's could be found.

3.  The applicant is entitled to additional personal and unit awards.  General orders awarded him the Purple Heart and DAGO's awarded his unit the:

* Presidential Unit Citation
* Valorous Unit Award
* three Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citations
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

4.  The applicant served in Vietnam during five campaigns; therefore, he is entitled to one silver service star for his already-awarded VSM.  This should be added to his DD Form 214.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the "VN Unit Cit."  This abbreviation does not directly correspond to any award listed in Army Regulation 600-8-22.  It is believed that this entry refers to the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation or the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, the "VN Unit Cit" should be deleted from his DD Form 214 and the proper entries should be recorded.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* deleting the following awards from his DD Form 214 –

* VSM
* "ACM W/V Dvc"
* "VN Unit Cit"

* adding the following awards to his DD Form 214 –

* Purple Heart
* AM
* ARCOM (2nd Award) with "V" Device
* VSM with one silver service star
* Presidential Unit Citation
* Valorous Unit Award
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (3rd Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to a second AM.



      _____________x____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022549



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022549



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008508

    Original file (20110008508.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 22 November 1966 to 21 November 1969; b. deleting the VSM and "VN Unit Cit" from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009872

    Original file (20130009872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge * ARCOM * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * BSM * PH * one overseas service bar 12. One overseas service bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010914

    Original file (20110010914.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: * Air Medal (AM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC) [2nd Award] * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device 2. The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 February 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000313

    Original file (20120000313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the following awards: a. There is no evidence to show he is authorized a third award of the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 29 January 1968 to 20 January 1970; b. deleting the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002123

    Original file (20140002123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device (5th Award) and multiple awards of the Air Medal (AM). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows the campaigns for Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the ARCOM with "V" Device and ARCOM with first and third oak leaf clusters.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002530

    Original file (20140002530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS. The available evidence does not show the applicant was recommended for or awarded a second award of the SS for actions in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his awards and decorations, as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002765

    Original file (20120002765.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued lists the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal (RVNCM) * ARCOM with “V” Device * Combat Medical Badge * BSM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 4 April 1968 through 4 January 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009911

    Original file (20110009911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * to show in item 1 (Last Name- First Name-Middle Name) his last name as K-----ch instead of K-----ck * to show, in effect, in item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), among other awards, the: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (3rd Award) and with "V" Device * Air...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019345

    Original file (20110019345.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN, his unit, 3rd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, was cited for award of the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period 1 July-13 November 1968 by Department of the Army GO (DAGO) 31, dated 1969 and the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 19 December 1968-28 June 1969 by DAGO 43, dated 1970. In this case, the evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was assigned to...