Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022514
Original file (20110022514 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  24 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110022514 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to show a reentry eligibility (RE) code that will allow him to reenter the military.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, neither his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) nor his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders contain an RE code.  He also states he never received any documentation related to his discharge processing.  He was discharged for missing drills and does not believe this should disqualify him from reentering the military.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and USAR discharge orders.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) on 23 March 2006. He served on initial active duty for training from 12 April through 18 August 2006 and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92Y, Unit Supply Specialist.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at this time shows he was transferred back to his ARNG unit and item 27 (RE code) contains the entry "NA" (not applicable).

3.  The applicant was administratively reduced to pay grade E-2, effective 18 May 2008, in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19, for being absent from inactive duty training. 

4.  On 18 May 2008, he was discharged from the ARNG for unsatisfactory participation and transferred to the USAR (Individual Ready Reserve).  The NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued at the time shows he was given a general discharge and assigned an RE code of "3." 

5.  On 14 July 2008, he was transferred to a USAR troop program unit.
 
6.  Headquarters, 99th Regional Support Command Orders 11-028-00018, dated 28 January 2011, reduced the applicant from pay grade E-2 to pay grade E-1.  These orders also discharged the applicant from the USAR with an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge, effective 4 February 2011.  These orders do not contain either a separation program designator (SPD) or an RE code.

7.  Other than the above discharge order, the available record does not show the applicant completed any service between 14 July 2008 and 4 February 2011 or documentation related to the reason for his discharge processing.

8.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations) states a Soldier's service may be characterized as only UOTHC when a discharge is for unsatisfactory participation.  When a Soldier is to be discharged with a UOTHC characterization of service the separation authority will direct an immediate reduction to private (PV1)/E-1.  Chapter 13 states a Soldier may be discharged as an unsatisfactory participant and their service will normally be characterized as UOTHC.

9.  Army Regulation 140-111 (USAR Reenlistment Program) states reenlisting is a privilege extended only to personnel of high moral character, professional competence, and who demonstrate adaptability to the requirements of the professional Soldier's moral code.  Persons who do not maintain such standards will be barred from further service.  Nonwaivable moral and administrative disqualifications include being discharged under other than honorable conditions.
10.  Army Regulation 601-280 (Army Retention Program) states the RE codes contained on military discharge documents determine whether or not one may reenlist in a military service at a later time.  In general, those who receive an Army RE code of 1 may reenlist in the Army or another service with no problem.  Individuals with an RE code of 3 can normally reenlist but will probably require a waiver to be processed.  Individuals with an Army RE code of 4 are normally not eligible to reenlist in the Army, nor join another service.  Further, an RE code of 
4 is to be afforded to persons separated in pay grade E-2 and below.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states an RE code is not used for USAR or ARNG Soldiers being separated following completion of their military occupations specialty training unless the separation is for cause.

12.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-9 states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  On 18 August 2006, the applicant was separated from active duty after completion of MOS training and as such the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time properly does not to include an RE code.  Soldiers being separated following completion of MOS training are not assigned an RE code unless the separation is for cause.

2.  The applicant had combined Reserve component service covering a period of 4 years and 10 months.  During this period he was discharged from the ARNG for unsatisfactory performance and by his own admission he was discharged from the USAR for failure to attend the required inactive duty training.  

3.  While the available record does not include the applicant's USAR separation processing documents under Army Regulation 135-178, there is sufficient evidence to presume he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 13 of this regulation.  

4.  The applicant's discharge orders from the USAR show he was reduced to pay grade E-1 and given a UOTHC discharge.  While the discharge orders do not include an RE code notation, under both Army Regulation 140-111 and Army Regulation 601-280, the applicant's UOTHC discharge in pay grade E-1 results in a non-waiverable bar to reenlistment. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022514



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110022514



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020403

    Original file (AR20120020403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 25 November 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participation, AR 135-178, NIF/NIF e. Unit of assignment: 680th EN CO, Canandiagua, NY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 15 November 2008, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 0 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 3 years, 2 months, 13 days i. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021476

    Original file (20140021476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record is void of the complete facts and circumstances surrounding his 2009 discharge; however, his records contain and he provided Orders Number 09-259-00036, issued by Headquarters, 143rd Civil Support Expeditionary Sustainment Command on 16 September 2009, reducing him to pay grade E-1 and discharging him from the USAR under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022910

    Original file (20110022910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show: * the characterization of his service was upgraded from under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to honorable; and * change his reentry (RE) code of "4" to a code that will allow him to reenter the military 2. The applicant’s record shows that after completing a total of 7 years, 10 months, and 13 days of active military service during two...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006370

    Original file (AR20130006370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to honorable, and change the reason for separation code. The evidence of record shows that on 12 October 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022244

    Original file (20100022244.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he reenlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in January 1983. Action was initiated by his command on 22 December 1981 for his separation from the MIARNG for misconduct. The evidence of record shows he was discharged from the MIARNG for misconduct in 1982.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011388C071029

    Original file (20060011388C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD). There is no indication in the applicant's record that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that Board's 15-year statute of limitations. Characterization of service normally will be UOTHC; however, the commander may authorize a GD if it is warranted based on the member's...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000993

    Original file (AR20130000993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 21 December 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Unsatisfactory Participant, AR 135-178, Chapter 13, RE NIF, SPD NA e. Unit of assignment: 814th MP Company, Arlington Heights, IL f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 6 October 2006, 6 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 2 months, 16 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 11 months, 13 days i. Prior Board Review: No v. SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant served in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009725

    Original file (20130009725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following: * 1989 and 1998 DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * 1998 DD Form 214 Worksheet * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * 2012 Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings * NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) * 2013 Enlistment Policy Changes email * 2013 Reenlistment Eligibility Data Display (REDD) Request Data * 2013 USMEPCOM Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012467

    Original file (AR20130012467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 29 February 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies (111105-120205) within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for her absences, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains documentation that shows the unit contacted the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001792

    Original file (AR20130001792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 28 September 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 135-178, by reason of unsatisfactory participation, for missing at least 9 training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid excuse for his absences, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his military records, the...