Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021788
Original file (20110021788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  8 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021788 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests all awards to which he is eligible be added to his record and DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  

2.  The applicant states he never received any medals and he believes somebody just missed it.  

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) orders in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 9 September 1964.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11E (Armor Crewman), and was promoted to sergeant/E-5 (SGT/E-5), the highest grade he held on active duty, on 23 May 1966.  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he receive “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows he earned the National Defense Medal (NDSM), Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar.  

4.  The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of derogatory information or a unit commander disqualification that would have precluded award of the AGCM.  

5.  On 23 August 1967, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of SGT/E-5, after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 15 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued lists the NDSM and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as earned awards.  

6.  The applicant provides Headquarters, 3rd Armored Division General Orders Number 287, dated 25 July 1967, which awarded the applicant the AGCM for the period 9 September 1964 through 8 September 1967.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time identified the DA Form 20 as the primary records source for entries on the DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to correct his records to add all awards to which he is eligible has been carefully considered and found to have merit.  By regulation all earned awards should be entered on the DD Form 214.  

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant earned the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar, as evidenced by an entry in item 41 of the DA Form 20 which  was not included on his DD Form 214.  


3.  Further, the applicant provides orders showing he was awarded the AGCM for his qualifying active duty service.  Even though these orders were not on file in the record, the DA Form 20 confirms he received “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings at all of his active duty assignments and his MPRJ is void of derogatory information or unit commander disqualification that would have precluded award of the AGCM.   As a result, it is concluded the applicant was in fact awarded the AGCM prior to his REFRAD and it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and DD Form 214.   

4.  The applicant also indicates he has never received the medal sets for the awards he earned.  Therefore, it would also be appropriate to issue the medal sets for the awards identified to the applicant.   

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Good Conduct Medal and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge to his record and DD Form 214; and by issuing him the medal sets for all earned awards. 



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021788



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021788



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002876C071029

    Original file (20070002876C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that actually thought he had already been awarded the AGCM and when he requested to be issued his medals, he thought he would receive the AGCM; however, when he did not receive the award, he realized the AGCM was not included in the list of awards entered on his separation document (DD Form 214). By regulation, a member is eligible to receive an AGCM for each three-year period of honorable active duty service and while there is no automatic entitlement to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005533

    Original file (20090005533.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal [for service in Vietnam], Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster and "V" Device, and any other awards which may have been omitted. The regulation stipulates that individuals who qualified for the AFEM for service in the RVN between 1 July 1958 and 3 July 1965 remained qualified for that medal; however, upon request could be awarded the VSM instead of the AFEM. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013439

    Original file (20110013439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214, item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), lists the following earned awards: * NDSM * RVNCM with Device * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * ARCOM 8. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 30 November 1965 through 13 November 1967, and to add this award to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002559C071029

    Original file (20070002559C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that Item 24 of his DD Form 214 includes an Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" (Valor) Device he never received and does not include a Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and BSM he received for meritorious service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in the RVN on 23 September 1968 and the BSM for meritorious achievement during the period April 1968 to April 1969. The applicant's record is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006800

    Original file (20090006800.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his 25 February 1969 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding the Silver Star (SS), Air Medals (AMs), Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and any other earned awards and decorations. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was not awarded MOS 11B until 29 July 1966.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007737C071029

    Original file (20070007737C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded by an enemy booby trap while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record includes an entry in Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 that confirms he was wounded in action in the RVN on 28 November 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action in Vietnam on 28 November 1967; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010977C071029

    Original file (20060010977C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at this time shows he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) in Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) contains the entry "NA." The evidence of record confirms that the only education and training recorded on the applicant's DA Form 20 that is not documented on a DD Form 214 issued to the applicant was the El Paso Community College...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005665

    Original file (20090005665.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the VSM and states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record is void of any entries or documents that indicate the applicant was ever wounded in action or treated for a combat related wound or injury by military medical personnel, or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004157C070208

    Original file (20040004157C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Linda M. Barker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006163

    Original file (20110006163.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He provides the following: * Two DD Forms 214 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 24 (Service Record) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * DA Forms 2627-1 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) * Special Orders Number 64, dated 19 December 1966 * General Orders...