Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021677
Original file (20110021677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  2 February 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021677 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his promotion and effective date of rank to chief warrant officer (CW2) be changed from 2 December 2011 to 4 May 2011.
 
2.  The applicant states:

* on 4 May 2011, he met the requirements for promotion to CW2 upon the completion of the Warrant Officer Basic Leadership Course (WOBLC) [WOBC]
* his unit submitted his promotion packet to The State Adjutant General without his WOBLC completion certification and DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)
* because of this administrative error, he did not receive his Federal recognition for CW2 until 2 December 2011
* he had to have Federal recognition orders in order to effect a change in his military occupational specialty (MOS)
* through no fault of his and because of the delay created by his State, he was not able to be promoted when he became eligible and met the requirements on 4 May 2011

3.  The applicant provides:

* self-authored statements
* Orders 334-026, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, Columbus, OH, dated 30 November 2010
* Orders 125-937, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, Columbus, OH, dated 5 May 2011
* Orders 125-940, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, Columbus, OH, dated 5 May 2011
* Special Orders Number 170 AR, Departments of the Army and Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Washington, D.C., dated 27 July 2011
* Special Orders Number 181 AR, Departments of the Army and Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Washington, D.C., dated 8 August 2011
* Memorandum, Departments of the Army and Air Force, National Guard Bureau, Washington, D.C., dated 14 August 2007
* DA Form 1059, dated 4 May 2011
* Certificate (Adjutant General School, U.S. Army Soldier Support Institute), dated 4 May 2011
* Orders, 261-174, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, Columbus, OH, dated 17 September 2008
* Federal Recognition Packet Entry

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Orders 261-174, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, Columbus, OH, dated 17 September 2008, show the applicant was promoted to sergeant first class (SFC) (E-7) with an effective date of 16 September 2008.

2.  The applicant served as an SFC for more than 2 years.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was released from active duty on 22 November 2010.

3.  On 23 November 2010, the applicant was appointed a warrant officer (WO1) in the Ohio National Guard.

4.  The applicant graduated Human Resource Warrant Officer Basic Course on 4 May 2011. 

5.  Orders 125-937, dated 5 May 2011, promoted the applicant to CW2 with an effective date of rank of 4 May 2011.

6.  Orders 125-940, dated 5 May 2011, changed the applicant's MOS with an effective date of 4 May 2011.

7.  In May 2011, the State discovered the applicant did not receive his initial Federal recognition for his appointment as a WO1.  Records show his Federal recognition package was not forwarded to the National Guard Bureau until 6 May 2011.  
8.  Special Orders Number 170 AR, dated 27 July 2011, shows the applicant was granted permanent Federal recognition for his initial appointment as a WO1 with an effective date of 23 November 2010.

9.  Special Orders Number 181 AR, dated 8 August 2011, shows the applicant's MOS was changed with an effective date of 4 May 2011.

10.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Personnel Branch, State of Ohio, Adjutant General's Department, on 21 October 2011.  After careful review, the advisory official stated the processing of applicant's initial appointment packet created a delay of 3 months in the applicant's appointment as a CW2 and requested the applicant be credited with 3 months in grade once his Federal recognition for promotion to CW2 was published.

11.  Special Orders 320 AR, dated 13 December 2011, shows the applicant was granted Federal Recognition as a CW2 with an effective date of 2 December 2011.

12.  National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant Officers – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) prescribes National Guard policies and procedures governing the appointment, assignment, and management of warrant officers of the ARNG.  

	a.  Chapter 2 provides that in order for a warrant officer to be concurrently appointed as a Reserve warrant officer of the Army, the State action must be Federally recognized.  Federal recognition is the process which ensures that officers appointed by the States meet the qualifications required for service in the Federal Armed Forces.

		(1)  Temporary Federal recognition may be extended to an officer who has been found qualified by a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for appointment in the ARNG of a State pending receipt of permanent Federal recognition and appointment as a Reserve officer of the Army.  Temporary Federal recognition will automatically terminate six months after the effective date of the State appointment.  However, should the initial period of temporary Federal recognition expire due to administrative processing delays through no fault of the applicant, a subsequent FRB must be convened to consider granting another 6-month period of temporary Federal recognition.

		(2)  The appointment of warrant officers in the ARNG is a function of the State concerned.  Upon appointment in the ARNG of a State and subscribed to 


an oath of office, a Soldier assumes a State status under which to serve.  Such a Soldier acquires a Federal status when he/she is Federally recognized by the Chief, National Guard Bureau, and appointed as a Reserve of the Army.  The effective date of Federal recognition is the date the warrant officer executes the oaths of office (NGB Form 3370).
	
   b.  Chapter 7 addresses promotions and states:

		(1)  A warrant officer promoted by the State and extended Federal recognition in the higher grade will be concurrently promoted to the higher grade in the Reserve of the Army.

		(2)  To be considered for Federal recognition and concurrent Reserve of the Army promotion to CW2 following State promotion to fill a unit vacancy, an ARNG WO1 must have his/her unit commander's recommendation and:

			(a)  be in an active status and duty MOS qualified,

			(b)  be medically fit and meet height and weight standards,

			(c)  have completed 2 years of service as a WO1,

			(d)  have completed the WOBC, and

			(e)  have passed an Army Physical Fitness Test.

	c.	National Guard Bureau Policy Memorandum #07-226, subject:  Policy to Appoint Sergeant First Class (SFC) to Chief Warrant Officer Two (CW2), dated 14 August 2007, states:

		(1)  Effective on the date of this memorandum, States are authorized to appoint SFC (E-7) to the grade of CW2 if they meet the criteria below.  SFC who has served a minimum of two consecutive years as an E-7 may be appointed to CW2 in one of two ways:

			(a)  SFC who is certified by the DA MOS proponent prior to the date of initial appointment (attendance of WOBC not required) may be appointed in the grade of CW2 upon completion of Warrant Officer Candidate School (WOCS).  Constructive credit for WOCs may be granted if the Soldier has satisfactorily completed an OCS within the previous 5 years.

			(b)  SFC who is eligible for MOS training may be promoted to CW2 after completion of WOCS and WOBC.  Constructive service credit for WOCS
may be granted if the Soldier satisfactorily completed an OCS within the previous 5 years.

		(2)  Appointment for Master Sergeant (MSG) (E-8) through Command Sergeant Major (CSM) (E-9) remains the same.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for changing his effective date of promotion to CW2 was carefully considered and determined to have merit.

2.  The Ohio National Guard originally failed to process the applicant's initial Federal recognition as a WO1 until after he qualified for promotion to CW2.  The time consumed in obtaining the applicant's initial Federal recognition delayed his appointment as a CW2.  This occurred through no fault of the applicant.

3.  Clearly the applicant qualified for promotion to CW2.  In accordance with National Guard Bureau Policy Memorandum #07-026, he was entitled to promotion to CW2 on 4 May 2011 based on:

* meeting the criteria of serving as an E-7 for two years
* completing WOBC on 4 May 2011

4.  Notwithstanding the advisory opinion recommending the applicant's effective date of promotion be adjusted by 3 months, the proper correction is to amend the applicant's Federal recognition order to CW2 to show an effective date of 4 May 2011, vice 2 December 2011.

5.  Additionally, he is entitled to all back pay and allowances due as a result of this correction.
 
BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X ___  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  Amending Special Orders Number 320 AR, National Guard Bureau, Washington, DC, dated 13 December 2011, to show Federal recognition effective date and date of rank of 4 May 2011, if otherwise qualified.

	b.  Paying him back pay and all allowances due as a result of this correction.



      __________X______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021677



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021677



6


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010304

    Original file (20120010304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) to show an effective date of 30 March 2011. The applicant states he completed the warrant officer basic course (WOBC) on 30 March 2011 and was eligible for advancement to CW2 on that date since he had more than 2 years of time in grade as a sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 prior to his Federal recognition date. Ohio ARNG memorandum, dated 29 May 2012, subject: Correction of ARNG Promotion Effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001308

    Original file (20110001308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was extended Federal recognition on 1 August 2008 as his initial effective date of appointment and date of rank (DOR) to warrant officer one (WO1) to allow for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) on 24 September 2010. As a means of clarification she offers the following information pertaining to the applicant: * he executed oaths of office and signed a DA Form 71 and an NGB Form 337 for his initial appointment in the OHARNG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006623

    Original file (20130006623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Paragraph 9-15b(6) states in the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2 in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2), except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army MOS certification (i.e., completion of WOBC), the following statement will be entered on the NGB Form 89: The applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a Warrant Officer, W1, as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007625

    Original file (20120007625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB Policy Memorandum 11-015, subject: Federal Recognition of WOs in the ARNG, dated 14 June 2011, states that ARNG WOs are initially appointed and are also promoted by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned. As a result, effective 7 January 2011, all initial appointments of WOs and promotion to higher grades, by warrant or commission, will be issued by the President. This development process resulted in the delay of the promotions of all ARNG WOs (and probably WOs from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018149

    Original file (20140018149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her date of rank (DOR) for promotion to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) be amended to the date she completed the Warrant Officer (WO) Basic Course (WOBC). National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-101 (WO Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 2-10c (in effect at the time) essentially states a Soldier in the rank of MSG may be promoted to CW2 in one of two ways, after first having served in the rank for 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007860

    Original file (20130007860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His effective date for promotion to E-7 was 9 August 2006; his effective date of appointment to warrant officer candidate was 28 July 2010; his effective date of appointment to warrant officer one (WO1) was 10 November 2010; his completion of WOBC and State promotion to CW2 was 18 April 2012; and his Federal recognition effective date of rank was 28 December 2012. c. All prerequisites to meet the promotion eligibility guidelines for CW2 were achieved. The applicant provides: * NGB Policy...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019347

    Original file (20130019347.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer two (CW2) in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) from 29 January 2013 to 20 August 2012. He further contends his DOR should be adjusted in accordance with (lAW) the NGB PPOM Number 13-006, dated 6 February 2013, which states in part, "Implement the 2013 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for WO promotions to CW2 which removed the requirement for a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) for promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005458

    Original file (20080005458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the case of an applicant being found qualified for Federal recognition as a CW2, in accordance with paragraph 2-10c(2) of this regulation, except for the successful completion of WOCS and Department of the Army certification, the following statement will be entered on the record of proceedings (NGB Form 89): "the applicant is qualified for appointment as a warrant officer in the Army National Guard and is extended temporary Federal recognition as a warrant officer WO1 as provided by NGR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013686

    Original file (20120013686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he took a voluntary reduction from sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 to sergeant (SGT)/E-5 in December 2006 to attend the CID Special Agent Course in May 2007 as required by his unit policy * he was assigned to the 1149th Military Police (MP) Detachment, U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) * prior to this reduction, he had served as an E-7 in the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR) for 5 1/2 months * he met the eligibility requirements for promotion to CW2 in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012973

    Original file (20130012973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum states all initial appointments of warrant officers and appointments in a higher grade (promotion) by warrant or commission will be issued by the President effective 7 January 2011. c. Before NDAA 2011, all National Guard warrant officer promotions effective DOR was the date of the State promotion orders as stated in the Federal Recognition Board recommendations. Based on NGB Policy Memorandum Number 07-026, he would have been eligible for promotion to CW2 upon completion...