Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021476
Original file (20110021476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  19 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021476 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) by issuance of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) showing he was awarded several commemorative medals, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM), and a medal for NATO service.

2.  He states he was discharged with only his DD Form 214.  He needs a DD Form 215 for clarification, listing all overseas medals, decorations, and citations to which he is entitled.  He has only received three medals:  the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Good Conduct Medal (GCM), and Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).  

3.  He provides:

* two DD Forms 214
* a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC)
* a printout of medals status inquiry results from the website of the Clothing and Heraldry Product Support Integration Directorate, U.S. Army Tank-automotive and Armaments Command
* a list of medals

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Commemorative medals are not awarded by the Department of Defense, nor are they authorized to be entered into military records.  The portion of his request pertaining to commemorative medals will not be addressed further in these Proceedings.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 May 1973.  After completing initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63C (Track Vehicle Mechanic).  He served in this and related MOS's throughout his Army service.  

4.  On 22 September 1976, he was honorably discharged to reenlist.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows he was authorized the NDSM.  

5.  On 23 September 1976, he reenlisted.  On 21 September 1979, he was honorable discharged by reason of completion of required active service.  He completed 6 years, 3 months, and 21 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows he had been awarded or authorized the NDSM, GCM, and ARCOM.  

6.  His record shows he served in Germany from 11 January 1974 through 8 January 1977 and completed the remainder of his service in the United States.

7.  He provides documentation showing the NPRC authorized issuance of the ARCOM, GCM, and NDSM to him and that those decorations were shipped to him in 2007.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards.  It states:

	a.  The AFEM is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during specified time periods.  An individual, who was not engaged in actual combat or equally hazardous activity, must have been a bona fide member of a unit participating in, or be engaged in the direct support of, the operation for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days provided this support involved entering the area of operations.  The regulation does not show that the AFEM was authorized for any operations in Germany during the applicant's service.

	b.  The AFSM may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States for designated operations after 1 June 1992.

	c.  The following missions/operations have been approved by the Secretary of Defense for acceptance and wear of the NATO Medal:  (1) Operations related to the former Republic of Yugoslavia (14 November 1995 to a date to be determined); (2) Operations related to Kosovo (13 October 1998 to a date to be determined); (3) Operation EAGLE ASSIST (12 October 2001 to 16 May 2002); (4) Operation ACTIVE ENDEAVOR (26 October 2001 to a date to be determined); (5) International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan (1 June 2003 to a date to be determined); and (6) Operations in the Balkans (1 January 2003 to a date to be determined).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant did not serve in any operations that made him eligible for the AFEM, AFSM, or a medal for NATO service.  The available records show he was authorized or awarded the NDSM, GCM, and ARCOM, which were properly recorded.  

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for issuing a DD Form 215 correcting his DD Form 214 to show additional awards.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021476





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021476



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068934C070402

    Original file (2002068934C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; temporary duty orders assigning him to Bosnia; a Certificate of Participation; two award certificates for the NATO Medal and the ARCOM; a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award); and three messages authorizing the Kosovo Campaign Medal, the AFEM, and the NATO Medal for Kosovo. There is no evidence which shows the applicant was awarded the NATO Medal or the Kosovo Campaign Medal based on service in Kosovo. Evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004018

    Original file (20140004018.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 9 May 1995 through 8 May 1998. b. d. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 9 May 1998 through 8 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 9 May 1998 through 8 May 2001 (Standard Name Line: SGT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002873

    Original file (20130002873.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the: * American Defense Commemorative Medal * 50th Anniversary Korean Commemorative Medal * Cold War Victory Medal * U.S. Army Commemorative Medal * Honorable Service Commemorative Medal * U.S. Armed Forces Retired Service Commemorative Medal * Army Forces Expert Marksman Commemorative Medal * United Nations Military Service Commemorative Medal * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Service Commemorative Medal * Armed Forces Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016861

    Original file (20080016861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that during his service in 1971 he was recommended for award of the ARCOM. He further states he is requesting that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his award of the ARCOM, the above mentioned awards, and all other awards to which he may be entitled. However, the evidence of record confirms the applicant's award of the MUC is already documented on his DD Form 214 dated 13 August 1974.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006881

    Original file (20080006881.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM), the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), and the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM). For operations in which personnel of only one military Service participate, the medal will be awarded only if there is no other suitable award available to that Service. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004325

    Original file (20140004325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He submits a Headquarters, 720th MP Battalion MFR, dated 21 April 1997, listing the companies and dates of deployment to Bosnia-Herzegovina with an enclosed list of personnel who deployed to Bosnia and earned the NATO Medal and AFSM for service in Bosnia. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 29 March 1995 through 2 January 1998 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010834

    Original file (20140010834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add the following awards: * three Army Achievement Medals (AAM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal * Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM) * Afghanistan Campaign Medal (ACM) * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (GWOTEM) * Kosovo Campaign Medal (KCM) 2. The 30 consecutive or 60...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023336

    Original file (20100023336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that acceptance of the NATO Medal has been approved for U.S. military personnel who serve under NATO command or operational control in direct support of the above NATO operations. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the NATO Medal, the AFEM, the AFSM, the AAM, and the ARCOM has been carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request. With respect to the NATO Medal, the evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007382

    Original file (20090007382.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was an Army National Guard specialist/pay grade E-4 with overseas service in Bosnia from October 1996 to April 1997 and that he was awarded the NATO Medal, two awards of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), one award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Armed Forces Service Medal, the Armed Forces Service Medal (AFSM), the Army Service Ribbon (ASR), the Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020970

    Original file (20140020970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence that he was authorized or awarded the AFSM or a second award of the NATO Medal. Acceptance of the NATO Medal has been approved for U.S. military personnel who serve under NATO command or operational control in direct support of NATO operations. c. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was awarded a second NATO Medal.