Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021353
Original file (20110021353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  1 May 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021353 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) be deemed  combat-incurred for the purpose of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC).  

2.  The applicant states that he is a retired Vietnam Veteran who was awarded the Purple Heart and the Air Medal with “V” Device in Vietnam and he served as a crew chief and door gunner on a UH-1C gunship.  He continues by stating that he was awarded a 10% disability rating for hearing, 30% for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 30% for IBS.  He also states that he has had PTSD and IBS for many years but did not seek medical attention because it would affect his military career and post-military career as a peace officer.  He continues by stating that the doctors have determined that his IBS symptoms are at least as likely as not caused or aggravated by his service-connected PTSD related to his service in Vietnam.

3.  The applicant provides a continuation page to his application explaining his request and an index page listing his enclosures. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was inducted on 12 February 1969 and on 18 February 1969 he enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his training as a helicopter repairman and was transferred to Vietnam on 13 April 1970. 

2.  He completed his tour in Vietnam on 23 March 1971 and was awarded the Purple Heart and the Air Medal with “V” Device and one oak leaf cluster.  He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments and was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 1 May 1979.

3.  On 15 March 1981 he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) due to completion of required service.  He had served 12 years, 1 month, and     4 days of active service.  

4.  On 16 March 1981 he enlisted in the U.S. Naval Reserve (USNR) and served in the USNR until 2 April 1981.

5.  On 21 October 1981 he enlisted in the Georgia Army National Guard (GAARNG) and on 28 December 1981 he entered active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program where he served until he was honorably retired on 28 February 1990 and was transferred to the Retired List in the pay grade of E-8 on 1 March 1990.  He had served 20 years, 3 months, and 12 days of active service.

6.  On 16 March 2004 the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded the applicant service-connection for Tinnitus (10%), hearing loss – right ear, and Duodenal Ulcer.  The VA denied service-connection for back condition, Pterygium of both eyes, IBS, Basal Cell carcinoma secondary to herbicide exposure, and PTSD.

7.  On 26 July 2006 the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) granted him CRSC (10%) for Tinnitus and 0% for impaired hearing. 

8.  On 9 August 2007 the VA granted him a 10% service-connected disability rating for PTSD.

9.   On 27 August 2007 HRC granted him CRSC (10%) for PTSD for a total of 20% combat-related disability.  HRC reconsidered his request on 1 October 2007 and his ratings remained the same.

10.  On 29 December 2010 the VA increased his service-connected disability for PTSD to 30%.

11.  On 25 February 2011 HRC granted him CRSC (30%) for PTSD for a total of 40% combat-related disability.  

12.  On 23 March 2011 the VA granted him a 30% service-connected disability rating for IBS.
13.  On 18 May 2011 HRC denied his request for CRSC for IBS because of insufficient evidence to show that a combat-related event caused his condition.

14.  On 15 June 2011 HRC again denied his request for CRSC for IBS because of insufficient evidence to show that a combat-related event caused his condition.

15.  On 3 August 2011 HRC again reviewed his claim and made a final disapproval of his request for CRSC for IBS.

16.  A review of the available records as well as the documents submitted by the applicant reveals no additional documents or evidence that has not been previously considered by either the VA or HRC.

17.  The Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy has provided policy guidance on the processing of CRSC appeals.  In that guidance it was stated that in order for a condition to be considered combat-related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war.

18.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a (CRSC) provides that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.  Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10% disabling.  For periods before 1 January 2004, members had to have disabilities for which they were awarded the Purple Heart and are rated at least 10% disabled or who are rated at least 60% disabled as a direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous duty, training exercises that simulate war, or cause by an instrumentality of war.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities.  Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.  In order to qualify for CRSC, the military retiree must show that the disability was incurred while engaged in combat, while performing duties simulating combat conditions, or while performing especially hazardous duties such as parachuting or scuba diving.

2.  The applicant's contention that his medical condition (IBS) was sustained while participating in combat operations has been carefully considered.  However, without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s disability to war, there is an insufficient basis in which to grant his request.  By the applicant’s own admission, he did not seek treatment for that condition and therefore it is difficult at best to determine when the condition occurred, especially given the passage of 40+ years since he served in Vietnam.

3.  The fact that the VA has awarded him service connection for IBS does not in itself establish that it is combat related.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to support his claim that his condition is combat related, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant’s requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021353





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021353



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011116

    Original file (20110011116.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA Rating Decision, dated 14 February 2009, indicates the applicant's PTSD was not incurred in or caused by military service and, therefore, was not considered to be service connected. The VA Rating Decision, dated 5 November 2010, indicates the applicant was granted service connection for PTSD rated at 30-percent disabling. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant's requests for CRSC were denied because the available evidence failed to show his medical conditions were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012224

    Original file (20110012224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests to be awarded Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). His military medical records are not available and his record does not contain any documentation to show he was treated for combat-related disabilities during his period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002331

    Original file (20110002331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Psychiatric Report, dated 1 December 2004 * VA rating/appeal decision, dated 2 June 2004 * VA PTSD Initial Evaluation - Progress Notes, dated 18 August 2009 * CRSC denial letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY (HRC-KNX), dated 29 December 2010 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018910

    Original file (20110018910.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018910 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110002331, on 28 July 2011.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013481

    Original file (20110013481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was retired on 30 June 1997, after serving 20 years and 10 days of active service. The OUSD has maintained in these opinions that in order for a condition to be considered combat related, there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018798

    Original file (20110018798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 2 August 2011 HRC CRSC decision also indicates the certifying officer was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities: VASRD* DESCRIPTION % JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS 5252 Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Hip 10% Final disapproval – Previously requested : No new evidence to show combat-related event caused condition 5242 Lumbosacral Strain with Radic-ulopathy of Lower Extremities 10% Final disapproval – Previously requested : No new evidence to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019541

    Original file (20110019541.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay since CRSC consists of the Military Department returning a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. Without evidence to establish a direct causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017080

    Original file (20110017080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He appealed that decision contending that his PTSD percentage had been raised by the VA and on 21 February 2012 HRC again denied his appeal because he provided no evidence to show that his PTSD was combat-related. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a (CRSC) provides that eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, specially hazardous military duty, training exercises that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007919

    Original file (20120007919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and tension headaches. His request was still disapproved for CRSC for his percentage related to his PTSD (50 percent) and his tension headaches (10 percent). The applicant's service record is void of evidence, and he has not provided sufficient evidence, which shows his tension headaches and PTSD were sustained during combat action or the simulation of war.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011840

    Original file (20090011840.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the HRC CRSC Branch denied the applicant's request that his 100-percent disability rating for PTSD be approved as combat related. Such disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship between the applicant's PTSD and war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his requested relief.