Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021083
Original file (20110021083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021083 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) to 8 September 2007 and promotion to first lieutenant (1LT) effective 29 July 2009 with all back pay and allowances through his Member of Congress.

2.  He states:

* the State of Michigan did not properly submit the paperwork for his Federal recognition when he was commissioned, so he was not Federally recognized
* he was reappointed by the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) as a new 2LT effective 23 September 2011 to gain Federal recognition
* his DOR for 2LT and promotion and DOR to 1LT need to be backdated

3.  He provides:

* National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board)
* memorandum from the Senior Army Advisor Michigan
* DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report)
* Orders 262-032, dated 19 September 2007, appointing him in the ARNG
* NGB Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer of the Army in the ARNG of the United States)
* Orders 287-860, dated 14 October 2009, promoting him to 1LT/O-2
* letter from NGB

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  At the time of his application, he was serving as a 2LT in the NCARNG.

2.  He submits an NGB Form 62E, undated, to apply for Federal recognition as an ARNG officer and appointment as a Reserve officer of the Army in the ARNG.  The application was signed by the State Adjutant General.

3.  He provides a memorandum, dated 16 July 2007, which shows a Federal recognition board would convene on 16 July 2007 in Augusta, MI.

4.  On 16 July 2007, a Federal recognition board was held by the MIARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal recognition.  The board found the applicant was physically, morally, generally, and professionally qualified for and recommended granting him Federal recognition.

5.  On 8 September 2007, he was appointed as a 2LT in the MIARNG after having prior enlisted service.

6.  On 8 September 2007, he executed the oaths of office for appointment in the MIARNG.  He was granted temporary Federal recognition.  His service record does not indicate he was granted permanent Federal recognition for this appointment.

7.  Orders 262-032, dated 19 September 2007, show he was appointed as a 2LT in the ARNG effective 8 September 2007.

8.  On 5 January 2009, he executed the oaths of office for appointment in the NCARNG.  He was granted temporary Federal recognition.

9.  Orders 050-811, dated 24 February 2009, show he was appointed as a 2LT in the NCARNG with an effective date of 5 January 2009 and a DOR of 8 September 2007.

10.  Special Orders Number 56 AR, dated 12 March 2009, show his Federal recognition was changed from the State of Michigan to North Carolina effective 5 January 2009.

11.  His DA Form 1059, dated 29 July 2009, shows he completed the Signal Basic Officer Leader Course 005-09 on 22 July 2009.

12.  Orders 287-860, dated 14 October 2009, show he was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 29 July 2009.

13.  Orders 271-924, dated 28 September 2011, show the applicant was appointed as a 2LT in the NCARNG with an effective date and a DOR of 23 September 2011.

14.  In a 4 October 2011 letter, the Chief, Congressional Inquiries, NGB Office of Legislative Liaison, informed the applicant's Congressman that:

	a.  the ARNG's Human Resources Policy and Programs Division (HRH) reviewed the applicant's letter and provided the following information:

		(1)  the applicant was appointed as a 2LT on 8 September 2007 in the MIARNG;

		(2)  the MIARNG never submitted the necessary paperwork for him to receive Federal recognition for promotion; and

		(3)  when the applicant transferred to the NCARNG, the State was not made aware of the problem.

	b.  the first step in resolving the applicant's promotion issue has been initiated.  The ARNG HRH advised the NCARNG to expedite the submission of an initial appointment packet for the applicant to ensure he receives temporary Federal recognition prior to deployment.  Permanent Federal recognition will be accomplished within 90 to 120 days after the packet is received.

	c.  the next step is for the applicant to submit a claim to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records requesting correction of his record for the purpose of having his DOR adjusted, being promoted to the next grade, and receiving back pay once his rank has been adjusted.

15.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officers-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions), paragraph 10-15b, states that temporary Federal recognition may be granted by a Federal recognition board to an eligible member when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a Federally-recognized unit of the ARNG.  The Federal recognition board will forward the NGB Form 89 and allied documents to The Adjutant General.  When the member is favorably recommended, The Adjutant General will endorse the packet to NGB.  If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal recognition, the Chief, NGB, extends permanent Federal recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which the member is qualified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that the State of Michigan did not properly submit the paperwork for his Federal recognition when he was commissioned, so he was not Federally recognized is acknowledged and found to have merit.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a 2LT in the MIARNG on 8 September 2007.  At that time, his Federal recognition packet and allied documents should have been forwarded to The Adjutant General of the State of Michigan for endorsement to NGB for extension of permanent Federal recognition.  Through no fault of the applicant, this action was not taken.

3.  It is clear that an administrative error denied the applicant permanent Federal recognition effective 8 September 2007.

4.  Based on applicable law and regulation, the applicant is entitled to be extended permanent Federal recognition for his initial appointment as a 2LT in the MIARNG effective 8 September 2007.

5.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 29 July 2009.

6.  The applicant should have been granted Federal recognition as a 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 29 July 2009.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all the State ARNG and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  issuing him orders to show he was extended Federal recognition for initial appointment as a 2LT effective 8 September 2007;

	b.  amending Orders 271-924, dated 28 September 2011, to show he was appointed as a 1LT in the NCARNG and was extended Federal recognition as a 1LT with a DOR and effective date of 29 July 2009; and

	c.  paying him any pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections.



      ___________X______________
       	     CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021083



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021083



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000543

    Original file (20090000543.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant essentially states that her initial appointment as a 2LT was never processed and expired after 6 months, and that the North Carolina Army National Guard (NCARNG) did another Federal recognition board and appointed her as a 1LT on 22 September 2008 with a DOR of 1 August 2007 [she was granted 1 year, 1 month, and 21 days of constructive credit]. The applicant provides an explanation page showing the reasons behind her name changes; a judgment for divorce, dated 22 February...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008644

    Original file (20120008644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In or around April 2009, his promotion packet went before a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) and shortly thereafter he was recommended for promotion by the Chief of Chaplains. The applicant provides: * Memorandum from the Chief of Chaplains * Orders 155-63 (State promotion to CPT) * Appointment memorandum * Email * NGB Special Orders Number 62 AR CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. As a result, the Board recommends that State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021544

    Original file (20130021544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Also on 3 August 2011, the applicant executed an oath office, at Ann Arbor, MI, recording the date of acceptance of appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army on that date. a. Paragraph 2-2 states that the effective date of Federal recognition for original appointment is the date on which the commissioned officer executes the oath of office in the State. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant executed an NGB Form 337 for appointment in the State on 21 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014920

    Original file (20130014920.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was appointed as a 2LT in the NCARNG and he executed an Oath of Office on 20 August 2011. He was extended Federal recognition for his initial appointment in the NCARNG as a 2LT with an effective date and DOR of 6 March 2013. It appears the expiration of his temporary Federal recognition was an administrative error on the part of the State and he should have been extended Federal recognition for his initial appointment as a 2LT with an effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016083

    Original file (20100016083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since she had 14 years of service and only needed 2 years of time in grade (TIG), she should have been promoted to CPT by the April 2009 Federal Recognition Board (FRB). National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer – Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal recognition. Had the applicant's initial Federal recognition date been timely, she would have been promoted to CPT effective 25 March 2009.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029335

    Original file (20100029335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 4 December 2010, the MIARNG, Officer Branch Noncommissioned Officer in Charge prepared an MFR indicating: a. he found no evidence the applicant's initial appointment packet was ever sent to the NGB for permanent Federal recognition; b. the AMEDD recruiting office was in the midst of a personnel change and the applicant's appointment packet was overlooked and never processed; c. while investigating his promotion eligibility it was determined he had never been extended permanent Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010005

    Original file (20080010005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition in the MIARNG, as a 2LT/O-1, in the MSC effective 15 January 2008. The evidence shows that the applicant's initial Federal Recognition Examining Board recommended her for appointment in the MIARNG in the rank of second lieutenant with an effective date and date of rank of 18 May 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019781

    Original file (20090019781.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available record does not indicate his appointment packet was considered by a Federal Recognition Board (FRB) to determine if he was qualified to be awarded Federal recognition. The evidence of record shows the applicant was granted temporary Federal recognition effective 20 July 2006 upon his initial appointment in the ALARNG and execution of the oath of office. As a result, the Board recommends that State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002444

    Original file (20130002444.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant received permanent Federal recognition as a 2LT from NGB within the 6-month period required by Army National Guard/Army regulations. In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Division, NGB, wherein, he recommended approval of the applicant's request to backdate her initial 2LT appointment to “23” May 2010, to promote her to 1LT effective on and with a date of rank of “23” November 2011, and provide her all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013053

    Original file (20100013053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It shows: * On 26 April 2007, she was selected for promotion by the RCSB * On 18 March 2008, she was appointed in the ARNG * On 8 June 2008, her Federal recognition packet was uploaded * On 10 June 2008, an NGB official confirmed her eligibility * On 11 June 2008, her promotion packet was submitted to MIARNG * On an unknown date, her initial Federal recognition packet was rejected * On 10 February 2009, additional documents were provided regarding her Federal recognition * On 8 July 2009,...