Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021059
Original file (20110021059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021059 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his first name as Jerry instead of Gerard.

2.  The applicant states he legally changed his name and his Regular Army (RA), United States Army Reserve (USAR), and Army National Guard (ARNG) military records are now in error and requires correction.

3.  The applicant further states he has provided a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); however it was not received with his application.  He does provide:

* Court order, dated 27 September 2011
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) (pages 3 and 4)
* Army National Guard Retirement Points History Statement
* DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 

justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military record shows that after having prior military service, he enlisted in the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) on 18 July 1994.  He held and served in military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his enlistment processing shows he enlisted under the first name he now claims is incorrect.  He authenticated this document with his signature using the name he now claims is incorrect on the date of his enlistment and entry on active duty.

4.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty, and all other documents included in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) lists the first name he now claims is incorrect.  The applicant authenticated this document with his signature by signing the first name he claims is incorrect in item 34 (Signature).

5.  On 1 April 1995, the applicant was honorably retired from the INARNG, having completed a total of 26 years, 1 month, and 5 days of creditable military service.  The NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau - Report of Separation and Record of Service) he was issued shows the same first name he now claims is incorrect.

6.  The applicant provides a court order issued by the Howard Circuit Court of the State of Indiana, Howard County, dated 27 September 2011.  It shows the circuit court judge granted the applicant's request to change his first name from Gerard to Jerry.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his records to reflect his new court-ordered name was carefully considered.
2.  The evidence of record confirms he served in and was retired using the first name that is listed on his DD Form 4, DD Form 2-1, NGB Form 22, and all other documents filed in his OMPF.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his new first name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, which confirms his new first name, will be filed in his OMPF.  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the first name recorded in his military record and to satisfy his desire to have his new first name documented in his OMPF.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 

are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021059





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021059



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015916

    Original file (20060015916.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The results of this request are not available for review with this application. Records show that after several appeal attempts the applicant was involuntarily separated from his AGR position on 31 January 2002 and reverted to a unit member of the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG). There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that the DD Form 214 issued at the time of his removal from the AGR program was prepared incorrectly or otherwise flawed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011945

    Original file (20140011945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Forms 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SSN) as 310-XX-XXXX instead of 317-XX-XXXX. The applicant's request to correct the SSN recorded on his NGB Forms 22 was noted. The evidence of record shows he recorded his SSN as 317-XX-XXXX when he enlisted in the INARNG in 1987 and this SSN was used exclusively...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021486

    Original file (20110021486.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his State of Indiana Certificate of Birth * DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) * DD Form 214 * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * VA Certificate of Eligibility for Loan Guaranty Benefits * a letter from the VA, dated 20 September 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 15 (DOB) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) shows his DOB as 11 December 1946. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013345

    Original file (20110013345.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 27 January 2011, and all other documents included in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) lists the last name he now claims is incorrect. __________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110013345 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007732

    Original file (20130007732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010083

    Original file (20110010083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired from the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 instead of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and to restore his retired pay in the pay grade of E-7, the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served in the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR). In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to MSgt/E-7 and successfully held that grade for many years until he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001605

    Original file (20110001605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of the last name on her military records. While it is understood why she would want her records changed to reflect her maiden or current legal name, the evidence of record confirms she served in and was separated in the last name that is listed on her ERB, DD Form 214, and all other documents that were filed in her OMPF subsequent to 18 June 2003, the date of her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018313

    Original file (20110018313.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military records shows all documents with the name Thomas Harry H-----. It shows the circuit court judge granted the applicant's request for name change from Thomas Harry H----- to Michelle Elizabeth B---------. The evidence of record confirms the applicant served in and was separated in the name that is listed on her DD Form 214 and all other documents filed in her official military personnel file (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011469

    Original file (20100011469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    She claims there was no indication the FSM was at risk for a heart attack and he had just received the retirement paperwork, including the SBP election form, the month before his death. The FSM's record confirms he received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20 Year Letter) on 30 October 1992. Absent any evidence the FSM attempted to cover the applicant during the period between when he was issued the 20 Year Letter and when he could have submitted his application...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011985

    Original file (20060011985.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214, with an effective date of 9 September 1962. The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 4, dated 26 November 1962. However, the evidence of record also shows on the date prior to his RA reenlistments, the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 on each of those occasions, with the last DD Form 214, dated 19 March 1974.