Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021046
Original file (20110021046.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 10 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110021046


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he injured his left eye in the Republic of Vietnam in 1972 when a piece of metal hit his eye during a mortar shell attack.  He further states he was taken to the military hospital at Da Nang for treatment.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 October 1970.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).  The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/E-3.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from on or about 14 July 1971 to on or about 7 April 1972.

4.  His record contains several Western Union telegrams sent to his parents which indicate he went to sick call on the morning of 21 February 1972.  Upon examination he was diagnosed with hyphema and glaucoma of the left eye and admitted to the hospital for treatment.  Subsequent telegrams state he was further diagnosed with lacerations of the left eye lid which occurred when he was struck in the eye with a can thrown by another individual.  On 28 February 1972, he was returned to duty with a 30-day limited-duty physical profile.

5.  On 6 November 1972, he was discharged from the Army under honorable conditions.

	a.  Item 18c (Total Active Service) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year and 10 months of total active service during his period of enlistment.

	b.  Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he served 8 months and 24 days of foreign service.

	c.  Item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 does not indicate he was awarded the Purple Heart.

	d.  Item 27 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 indicates he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 12 July 1971 through 7 April 1972.

6.  His available record does not contain orders for the Purple Heart.

7.  His name does appear on the Vietnam casualty roster; however, his wound was classified as a non-hostile injury.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to add the Purple Heart.  The evidence of record shows he suffered a left-eye injury during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; however, his injury was determined to be the result of non-hostile action.  Army Regulations state that for award of the Purple Heart, a wound must have resulted from hostile action.  Such was not the case; therefore, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x____________
                CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110021046



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005758

    Original file (20080005758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 of the applicant’s DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provided a copy of a Western Union Telegram, dated 16 July 1970, to the applicant's parents which states, in pertinent part: "The Secretary of the Army has asked me to inform you that your son [the applicant] was slightly wounded in action in Vietnam on 14 July 1970 while driver of a military vehicle on a military mission when a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015592

    Original file (20100015592.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's file contains no information that would have disqualified him for the Army Good Conduct Medal, therefore, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025322

    Original file (20100025322.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 3d Field Hospital General Orders Number 154, dated 3 June 1969, show he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 June 1969 in Vietnam. Although he contends he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds (left eye/head and back) received in action on 3 June 1969 when his vehicle went over a landmine and the entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20 also shows he was wounded on 3 June 1969, orders show he received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021400

    Original file (20100021400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. _____________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019155

    Original file (20080019155.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's military service record awarding him the Purple Heart. The applicant's service medical records were not available for review. In the absence of military records which show the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008381

    Original file (20130008381.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he received the medals but they are not shown on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd Award) for wounds received in action on 2 January 1970 in Vietnam * adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Purple Heart (2nd Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Marksman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017033

    Original file (20080017033.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. He served in the Republic of Vietnam, was awarded the Purple Heart, and received an "excellent" conduct and efficiency rating throughout his military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 2 June 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam; b. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008961

    Original file (20120008961.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence to show the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 4 March 1971 in Vietnam; b. awarding him the first award of the Army Good...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001556

    Original file (20150001556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated in his previous application: a. His records contain: a. He described these injuries as "superficial" and stated he believed the injuries may have been cause by shrapnel from the explosion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021103

    Original file (20090021103.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the preponderance of evidence in this case is sufficient to award the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received on 16 July 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the: * Purple Heart for wounds received on 16 July 1970 in the Republic of Vietnam * Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 November 1968 to 28 October 1970 2. The Board also...