IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 3 April 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020639
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect his discharge be upgraded.
2. The applicant states he overcame the mistake he made 30 years ago with drugs and now needs help from the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC).
3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 December 1977. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/E4.
3. The available records indicate the applicant received nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on two occasions for the offenses indicated:
* on 19 November 1979, for leaving his post
* on 19 February 1980, for failure to go to his appointed place of duty
4. The applicant's discharge packet is not available. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 9 May 1980 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 10, for the good of the service, Separation Code "JFS", in lieu of court-martial with a character of service of under conditions other than honorable. He completed 2 years, 4 months, and 13 days of creditable active military service.
5. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
6. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
7. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's argument his discharge should be upgraded was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.
2. Absent evidence to the contrary, the applicant's request for separation for the good of the service to avoid a trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 is presumed to have been voluntary, administratively correct, and in compliance with applicable regulations.
3. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was not properly and equitably
discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time and that all
requirements of law and regulations were not met or that the rights of the applicant were not fully protected throughout the separation process. Absent such evidence, regularity must be presumed in this case.
4. The ABCMR does not grant requests for upgrade of discharges solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for VA benefits.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X____ ___X____ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________X___________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020639
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020639
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019006
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 22 October 1980, the applicant was discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009447
The evidence shows the applicant received counseling on 10 separate occasions regarding his conduct. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007457
On 30 January 1981, the applicant was punished under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ, for being AWOL from his unit from 29 December 1980 through 31 December 1980. The evidence shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10. The characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and it is presumed the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014641
A copy of an Army Europe (AE) Form 113 (Recommendation for Elimination under the Provisions of Chapter 14, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel)), dated 24 March 1980, shows the applicants commander initiated a separation action for misconduct by reason of frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. There is no evidence to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for review of his discharge within...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004601
The applicant states that he went absent without leave (AWOL) because his grandfather died in 1980 while he was in Korea. On 29 April 1980, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, conduct triable by court-martial, with a discharge UOTHC. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018964
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Records show the applicant was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf in evidence which would accompany his request for discharge. Records show the applicant's pay grade at the time of his separation was E-1.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001435
The applicant requests upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicants DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 4 December 1981 in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, and his service characterized as under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011617
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019254
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant request reconsideration of his previous request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge to a general discharge. On 22 October 1980, the applicant requested a delay in the processing of the court-martial charge and specifications against him until the commanding general, Fort Dix, acted on his application for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003237C070208
The applicant states that his time in service and his record will show that he did the best he could. The applicant's complete records were not available and circumstances surrounding his discharge under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), in lieu of trial by court-martial were not in the available records. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable...