Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020623
Original file (20110020623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  26 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020623 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 8a (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the 2d Squadron, 183rd Cavalry Regiment, A Troop.

2.  The applicant states he did not serve with the field artillery unit listed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant enlisted in the Virginia Army National Guard on 22 August 2003 and was assigned to Company B, 429th Support Battalion, Richmond, VA.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (Medical Equipment Repairer).  The highest rank/ pay grade he attained while on active duty was specialist (SPC)/E-4.

3.  Orders Number 130-123, Joint Forces Headquarters Virginia, Blackstone, VA, dated 10 May 2007, show the applicant was transferred to Battery B (Forward), 1st Battalion, 111th Field Artillery, Portsmouth, VA on 10 May 2007.

4.  Orders Number 136-669, Office of the Adjutant General of Virginia, Joint Force Headquarters Virginia, Blackstone, VA, dated 16 May 2007, ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom as a member of his unit, Battery B (Forward), 1st Battalion, 111th Field Artillery.

5.  On 18 May 2008, the applicant was honorably released from active duty for completion of required active service.  He completed 11 months and 11 days of active service.

6.  Orders Number 176-100, Virginia Army National Guard, Blackstone, VA, dated 24 June 2008, show the applicant was transferred from Battery B (Forward), 1st Battalion, 111th Field Artillery, Portsmouth, VA to Company C, 429th Support Battalion, effective 10 July 2008.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part it states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of the unit to which he was last assigned on his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.

2.  Orders show the applicant's DD Form 214 properly reflects Battery B (Forward), 1st Battalion, 111th Field Artillery was the unit to which he was last assigned.  In the absence of military records or other corroborating evidence showing this was not his final unit of assignment prior to release from active duty there is an insufficient basis for correcting his DD Form 214.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020623



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020623



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017986

    Original file (20140017986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    As new evidence, the applicant provides a statement of support, dated 30 September 2014, wherein (Retired) Brigadier General (BG) RLT, stated, in part: a. There is no evidence and the applicant hasn't provided any evidence that shows these orders were issued in error. There is no evidence and the applicant hasn't provided any evidence that shows these orders were issued in error.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000027

    Original file (20150000027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that a DA Form 2166-8 (NCO [Noncommissioned Officer] Evaluation Report) (NCOER) for the period 1 December 2007 to 1 October 2008 (hereafter referred to as the contested NCOER) be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The contested NCOER contains signatures of the applicant, the rater, and the senior rater. The period of the contested report overlaps the period of the NCOER with an ending date of 20 November 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006109

    Original file (20110006109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is not entitled to have his record corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting C Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, USAREUR E7 from item 7 of his DD Form 214; b. adding Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 14th Field Artillery Regiment, 1st Armored Division, USAREUR E7 to item 9 of his DD Form 214; c. awarding him the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026432

    Original file (20100026432.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * Item 22 (MOS) shows he was awarded MOS 13A (FA Basic) on 10 February 1969, awarded primary MOS 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist) on 9 August 1969, and primary MOS 36K (Field Wireman) on 9 March 1970 * Item 27 (Military Education) shows he completed the FA Basic Course in MOS 13A in 1969 * Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served in Vietnam from 12 February 1969 through 21 April 1970 * Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013900

    Original file (20110013900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100026184, on 4 May 2011. The applicant's records show he held an artillery MOS and served with Artillery units in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the available records that show he met any of the three qualifying conditions for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015430

    Original file (20130015430.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the issuance of certificates of achievement. It states commanders may recognize periods of faithful service, acts, or achievements which do not meet the standards required for decorations by issuing a DA Form 2442 (Certificate of Achievement) or a certificate of achievement (or appreciation) of local design to individual U.S. military personnel. Although copies of certificates of achievement or memoranda of record stating that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016912

    Original file (20130016912 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any evidence that he was recommended for, authorized, or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027964

    Original file (20100027964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record is also void of documentation showing he was awarded the CIB. In a statement provided with his application, the applicant indicated that he served with 1st Battalion, 20th Infantry, as an RTO and forward observer, but he was not eligible for the CIB because of his MOS. While the available documentation generally confirms his account of his service in Vietnam, it does not show definitively that he was assigned primary duty under MACV as an RTO accompanying infantry or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006060

    Original file (20080006060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant’s official records fails to indicate that the applicant ever deployed from Fort Hood and the applicant has not provided any evidence to show any such deployment. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008659

    Original file (20110008659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In pertinent part, it stated that: a. the separating Soldier's last duty assignment and the Major Command to which it was subordinate would be entered in item 12 of the DD Form 214. b. the total active duty service outside the continental limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last oversea theater in which service was performed would be entered in item 22c of...