Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020474
Original file (20110020474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    18 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020474 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent daughter.

2.  He states:

	a.  The conditions for the use and transfer of the new GI Bill were vague when they were first introduced.

	b.  He was an Army Reserve Soldier who entered sanctuary status following his 18th year of active duty.  He was not told of the specifics of the new GI Bill.

	c.  He was not afforded the opportunity to attend many of the out-processing  briefings while others were allowed to attend.

	d.  He was not allowed to extend beyond 20 years to be eligible for a benefit which began a month or two after his mandatory discharge from active duty.

3.  He provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), DD Form 1173 (U.S. Uniformed Services Identification and Privilege Card) for his dependent, and an article from the Army Times.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired on 31 May 2009 in the rank of lieutenant colonel/O-5 upon completion of sufficient years of service.

2.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Education Incentives Branch, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Fort Knox, KY.

	a.  Public Law 110-252 establishes legal limitations on the transferability of unused Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits.  The law limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009.

	b.  The applicant is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to his daughter because he was not on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009 which is a requirement established in law.

	c.  The advisory official recommended denial of the applicant's request.

	d.  The TEB online database shows the applicant had two eligible dependents enrolled in the Defense Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System as of 1 August 2009.  If he had met all the prerequisites, including being a member of the service on or after 1 August 2009, he would have been eligible to transfer benefits to his two dependents (spouse and child).

	e.  The applicant's last day in military service was 31 May 2009 which was prior to the program's implementation.

3.  On 10 January 2012, the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond within the allotted timeframe.

4.  On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states an eligible individual is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and:

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or

	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

5.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions regarding his entitlement to transfer of TEB under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter are acknowledged.

2.  However, since he retired on 1 June 2009 which is prior to the implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB Program, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the program to his dependent child.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020474



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020474



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011135

    Original file (20120011135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is not eligible to transfer her education benefits to her dependent under the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill because she did not provide evidence showing she attempted to transfer them to her dependent daughter, C.M., prior to leaving military service. The applicant transferred education benefits to her dependent child, B.M.D., while she was still in military service. The evidence of record shows she was fully eligible to transfer her educational benefits under the TEB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013646

    Original file (20120013646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must initially request to transfer benefits on the DOD TEB online database. However, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he attempted to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents other than his daughter (Michelle)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010903

    Original file (20120010903.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 110-252 also established the legal requirements for the transferability of unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a member of the Selected Reserve on or after 1 August 2009. c. The applicant's last day of service with the Army National Guard was 31 January 2011. The evidence of record shows the applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve on 31 January 2011. As the applicant failed to transfer the benefits to his son while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011763

    Original file (20140011763.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer unused education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. Public Law 110-252, section 3020, limits eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or as a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005622

    Original file (20120005622.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A VA Certificate of Eligibility, dated 23 February 2012, shows the applicant was approved to transfer 36 months of education benefits to her daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill. The applicant had nearly 12 years of service as of the program’s implementation date of 1 August 2009; therefore, she was eligible to transfer to either her spouse or her children. She transferred benefits to her dependent on 19 January 2012. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007920

    Original file (20110007920.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserves at the time of transfer of education benefits to his or her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009). The applicant in this case had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer to either his spouse or children (if he completed the request before leaving military service). He was also eligible to transfer his education benefits to his dependent(s) under the TEB prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009421

    Original file (20120009421.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 December 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120009421 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). However, since he retired on 31 December 2006 which is prior to implementation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to family members under this program.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008413

    Original file (20120008413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant had more than 25 years of service upon her retirement, so she was eligible to transfer benefits to either her spouse or children if she had completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007288

    Original file (20140007288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, to adjust the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) Obligation End Date (OED) and the Department of the Army TEB Service Obligation to 31 October 2011, his last day on active duty. The applicant was on active duty when he requested TEB. With regard to his daughter's approximately $33,000.00 debt which the VA initiated due to the applicant not fulfilling the TEB OED, the VA permits the veteran to submit a request for relief through the VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018850

    Original file (20110018850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, transfer of his educational benefits to his daughter under the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. The applicant states: a. he was not adequately informed of regulations requiring an additional 2-year active duty service commitment in order to transfer his 9/11 Montgomery GI Bill benefits to his daughter. He was retirement eligible in November 2010, and he has an approved retirement date of 29 February 2012.