Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020191
Original file (20110020191.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  12 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110020191 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 20 May 1996 to show his rank and grade as staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6, a second award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM), and completion of the Infantry Leaders Course.

2.  The applicant states he earned the awards and accomplishments and believes they should be listed on his DD Form 214.  He adds that having the awards and the correct rank listed will help him attain the employment he is seeking.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214, DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), AAM Certificate, and Certificate of Training.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his rank and grade as SSG/E-6.  However, he provides a DD Form 215, dated 3 March 2004, which corrected his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1996 to show his rank and grade as SSG/E-6.  Because his DD Form 214 has already been corrected to show his rank and grade as SSG/E-6, this issue will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.  However, it appears he is requesting to be reissued a DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 26 February 1986 to 25 February 1989.  His DD Form 214 for this period of service does not show the AAM.

4.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 December 1993.  An AAM Certificate indicates Permanent Orders 1-2, 70th Training Division, awarded him the AAM on 9 January 1994 for meritorious service as a drill sergeant while a member of the USAR.

5.  On 3 February 1994, he again enlisted in the Regular Army.  A Certificate of Training shows he completed the Infantry Leaders Course on 7 February 1995.  The certificate also shows this training was conducted during the period 11 January-7 February 1995.

6.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he also completed the 2-week Air Assault Course in 1994.

7.  On 20 May 1996, he was retired and placed on the Temporary Disability Retirement List.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 for this period of service only shows one AAM.  Item 13 also shows the Air Assault Badge.  Item 14 (Military Education) shows the entry "None."

8.  There are no orders or any other evidence showing he was awarded a second AAM.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, or release from active duty service or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.

	a.  In item 14, list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214.  Include title, length in weeks, and year completed.  This information is to assist the Soldier in job placement and counseling; therefore, do not list training courses for combat skills.

	b.  Once a DD Form 214 has been issued, it will not be reissued except for the following reasons:

		(1)  when directed by proper appellate authority, Executive Order, or by the Secretary of the Army;

		(2)  when it is determined that the original DD Form 214 cannot be properly corrected by issuance of a DD Form 215 or if the correction would require issuance of more than two DD Forms 215; and

		(3)  when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show a second AAM and the Infantry Leaders Course has been carefully reviewed.

2.  The evidence confirms he completed the Air Assault Course during the period covered by the DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1996.  Therefore, this course should be added to item 14 of his DD Form 214.

3.  The evidence also confirms he completed the Infantry Leaders Course; however, the governing regulation at the time provided that training courses for combat skills would not be entered in item 14 of the DD Form 214.  The Infantry Leaders Course is a combat skills training course; therefore, this training should not be added to his DD Form 214.

4.  There is no evidence in his military record showing he was awarded a second AAM.  Therefore, there is no basis to grant this portion of his request.

5.  The recommended correction in paragraph 2 above will result in the issuance of a second DD Form 215 pertaining to the DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1996.  Therefore, a DD Form 214 should not be reissued.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X  ___  ___X ___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the entry "Air Assault Course, 2 weeks, 1994" to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 20 May 1996.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding a second AAM and the Infantry Leaders Course to his DD Form 214 and to reissuance of a DD Form 214.



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020191



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110020191



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021650

    Original file (20110021650.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows he was promoted to SGT/E-5, effective 16 February 2006; however, the period of service covered by his DD Form 214 ended on 28 November 2005. Army Regulation 635-5 states that item 14 documents those training courses successfully completed during the period of active duty covered by the DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214, for the period ending 28 November 2005, by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012490

    Original file (20130012490.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) he entered active duty on 10 June 2000 instead of 15 August 2000; c. Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) he completed 11 months of active duty instead of 8 months and 27 days of active duty; d. Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) his date of rank to CPT as 10 April 2000 instead of 30 July 1996; and e. Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of service)) award of the: (1)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001633

    Original file (20110001633.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * NAVPERS (Navy Personnel) 1650/65 (Transmittal of and/or Entitlement to Awards) * Diploma of completion of the Infantry NCO Candidate Course * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * Special Orders Number 306 (promotion to sergeant) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007509

    Original file (20090007509.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214, dated 18 May 1998; two DD Forms 215 (Correction to DD Form 214); four certificates for completion of military training courses; four certificates for award of the Army Achievement Medal; two DA Forms 638-1 (Recommendation for Award); and orders for award of the Expert Infantry Badge (Silver). The available service record provides the following evidence concerning awards that should be included on the 1998 DD Form 214. a. For enlisted Soldiers with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017213

    Original file (20100017213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 27 May 1993 to show the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), Air Assault Badge, and a second award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). There are no orders for the Air Assault Badge in the applicant's service personnel records. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided no evidence which shows he completed the Air Assault course.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088732C070403

    Original file (2003088732C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a letter of explanation; a DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 February 2003; a DD Form 214 for the period ending 5 December 1999; three DA Forms 638-1 (Recommendation for Award of Army Achievement Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and Meritorious Service Medal); five DA Forms 638 (Recommendation for Award); DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part I); DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report), dated 8...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022458

    Original file (20100022458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificates of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 11 September 2002 to consolidate the information from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 November 2001 into one form. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000425

    Original file (20090000425.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 12 shows he completed 5 years, 2 months, and 4 days of active military service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (1 September 1989-4 November 1994) and that he completed no prior active military service. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant completed a 19K course during the period covered by his DD Form 214; therefore, it must be presumed the applicant completed this course while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000059

    Original file (20120000059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Item 11 (Primary Specialty) to change his military occupational specialty (MOS) from "95B2O" to "95B2B" * Item 12f (Foreign Service) to change his foreign service from "2 years, 0 months, 0 days" to "2 years, 9 months, and 0 days" * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to add: * Army Superior Unit Award * Expert...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013164

    Original file (20080013164.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) and Item 14 (Military Education) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. By regulation, Item 13 of the DD Form 214 lists awards for all periods of service and Item 14 documents formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully...