Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019911
Original file (20110019911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 April 2012 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019911 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal with valor.

2.  The applicant states the three awards are not listed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 March 1966 and he held military occupational specialty 67N (UH-1 Helicopter Repairman).  He served in Vietnam with the 187th Aviation Company, 1st Aviation Brigade, from 2 March 1967 to 24 February 1968.

3.  Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, published the following General Orders (GO):

* GO Number 1803, on 13 May 1967, awarding him the Air Medal for achievement from 3 to 17 April 1967
* GO Number 2902, on 25 June 1967, awarding him the Air Medal (1st through third Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC)) for achievement from 17 April to 14 may 1967
* GO Number 3027, on 30 June 1967, awarding him the Air Medal with "V" Device for heroism on 20 May 1967
* GO Number 3035, on 2 July 1967, awarding him the Air Medal (4th through 5th OLC) for achievement from 14 May to 7 June 1967
* GO Number 4187, on 5 September 1967, awarding him the Air Medal (7th through 10th OLC) for achievement from 7 June to 15 July 1967
* GO Number 4286, on 11 September 1967, awarding him the Air Medal with "V" Device for heroism on 18 May 1967
* GO Number 4652, on 2 October 1967, awarding him the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism on 7 August 1967

4.  His records do not contain official orders awarding him a second award of the Distinguished Flying Cross.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist five (SP5)/E-5 on 24 February 1968.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Air Medal
* Aircraft Crewman Badge
* Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Distinguished Flying Cross is awarded to any person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight.  The performance of the act of heroism must be evidenced by voluntary action above and beyond the call of duty.  The extraordinary achievement must have resulted in an accomplishment so exceptional and outstanding as to clearly set the individual apart from his or her comrades or from other persons in similar circumstances.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  An oak leaf cluster designates second or subsequent award.

7.  A review of the applicant's records reveals his entitlement to additional awards which are not shown on his DD Form 214.

8.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 shows that during his service in Vietnam, campaign participation credit was awarded for the below campaigns.  It also states a bronze service star is authorized with the Vietnam Service Medal for each Vietnam campaign.

* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase; 1 July 1966 - 31 May 1967
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III (1 June 1967 to 29 January 1968)
* Tet Counteroffensive (30 January to 1 April 1968)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase IV (2 April to 30 June 1968)

9.  Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows during his tenure with the 187th Aviation Company, his unit was awarded the:

* Meritorious Unit Commendation, for service from 1 January to 31 December 1967, based on DAGO Number 48, dated 1968
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service from 1 March 1966 to 26 March 1967 based on DAGO Number 22, dated 1968, and from 27 March 1967 to 17 may 1968, based on DAGO Number 46, dated 1969

10.  A review of his records reveals no other derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Furthermore, item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service.  

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service.  This period was 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ended with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. 

12.  Item 29 (Qualification in Arms) of his DA Form 20 shows he qualified sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle in April 1966.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  GO awarded the applicant 13 awards of the Air Medal, two awards for heroism ("V" Device) and 11 awards (7th through 10th OLC) for achievement, which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

2.  GO awarded him the Distinguished Flying Cross which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  GO awarded his unit of assignment in Vietnam the Meritorious Unit Commendation and two awards of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which are not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards. 

4.  He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  Additionally, he participated in four campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.

5.  He served honorably during the period 3 March 1966 through 24 February 1968.  He served in Vietnam, attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5, and he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout most of his military service.  Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and to correct his records to show this award.

6.  He qualified sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle in April 1966; therefore, he is entitled to award of the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show it.

7.  His record is void of official orders awarding him a second award of the Distinguished Flying Cross.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required for this award.  In the absence of official orders, there is insufficient evidence to add a second award of the Distinguished Flying Cross to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 3 March 1966 through 24 February 1968
* deleting the Air Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214 and adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the:

* Distinguished Flying Cross
* Air Medal (12th Award) and "V" Device
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Valorous Unit Award
* Meritorious Unit Commendation
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 

denial of so much of the application that pertains to a second award of the Distinguished Flying Cross. 



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019911



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019911



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000666

    Original file (20130000666.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade, published the following GO: * GO Number 1680, dated 5 May 1967, awarding him the Air Medal (1st through 6th Oak Leaf Cluster (OLC)) for meritorious achievement from 15 December 1966 to 22February 1967 * GO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021334

    Original file (20110021334.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following awards be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge): * Second Air Medal with "V" device * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Valorous Unit Award * Meritorious Unit Commendation (Army) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation 2. He states that maybe the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001230

    Original file (20110001230.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Furthermore, the evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Air Medal (9th OLC) with "V" Device for heroism which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea from 19 August 1962 to 20 July 1963. By regulation, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003311

    Original file (20090003311.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant's Army orders for the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism on 13 June 1966 were revoked, the evidence of record shows that the Secretary of the Navy approved an award of the Distinguished Flying Cross for the applicant for heroism on 13 June 1966 in Vietnam. The Secretary of the Navy's decision, dated 1 March 1967, is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend his DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 May 1968 to show this award. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006393

    Original file (20140006393.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the: * Air Medal with "V" Device * Meritorious Service Medal with 1st OLC * Master Army Aviator Badge 2. GO Number 307, issued by Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, on 10 January 1970, awarded him the Air Medal with 40th OLC. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005550

    Original file (20140005550.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Silver Star * Air Medal with 18 oak leaf clusters (OLC) * Army Commendation Medal * Expert Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar 2. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054861C070420

    Original file (2001054861C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further indicates it was never awarded. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the PUC (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966) is awarded for extraordinary heroism in action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides in pertinent part for award of the DFC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019629

    Original file (20130019629.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a former service member (FSM), requests correction of her husband's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Distinguished Flying Cross. The applicant provides GOs that clearly show the FSM was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross for heroism in aerial action in Vietnam on 20 February 1967 and his record contains GOs that awarded him the Air Medal (28th Award), neither of which are shown on his DD Form 214. As...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002294C070205

    Original file (20060002294C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, he desires the DD Form 214 to be corrected and brought forward in date to reflect the most current information, which includes the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC). The DD Form 214 is issued only upon REFRAD or discharge from active duty and the additional service to which the applicant refers was USAR service that occurred after the DD Form 214 was issued. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to...