Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019882
Original file (20110019882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019882 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 30 September 2009.
 
2.  The applicant states he was unaware that he had the opportunity to transfer his benefits until after he retired.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 September 1988 and served through a series of continuous reenlistments until he was honorably retired from active duty in the rank of sergeant first class/E-7 on 30 September 2009.  He completed 21 years and 9 days of active service and was placed on the Retired List effective 1 October 2009.

2.  During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, Chief, Enlisted Professional Development Branch, who stated the applicant was not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents as he was separated from military service prior to transferring his benefits.  He further states the Army, Department of Defense, and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues and that information on the program and subsequent transfer of entitlements were published well in advance of the implementation date of 1 August 2009.  However, because the applicant was separated within 90 days of the implementation of the program it was recommended that his request be approved because many Soldiers who left military service during the first 90 days of the program were not fully aware of the requirement to transfer benefits prior to leaving military service.  The advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment and to date no response has been received by the staff of the Board.

3.  The Post-9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 is described under Title V of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2008, Public 
Law 110-252, House of Representatives, 2642.  In July of 2008, Congress passed a law for the Post-9/11 GI Bill which went into effect on 1 August 2009.

4.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused educational benefits to family members.  A service member may execute the transfer of benefits only while serving as a member of the Armed Forces.  The VA is responsible for final determination of eligibility for educational benefits under this program.  General eligibility criteria are as follows:

	a.  Service members must have accrued specific qualifying active duty service on or after 11 September 2001 of at least 30 continuous days of qualifying active duty service if discharged due to a service-connected disability or between 90 days and 36 months or more of total aggregate qualifying active duty service.

	b.  Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, and 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e., mobilization), and must have received an honorable discharge at the conclusion of active duty service.

5.  The program guidance stipulates that if a service member becomes retirement eligible during the period beginning on 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013 and agrees to serve the additional period as specified below, he/she is entitled to transfer benefits to his/her dependents.  A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or 20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732:

	a.  service members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009 – no additional service is required;
	b.  service members who have an approved retirement date after 1 August 2009 and before 1 July 2010 – no additional is service required;

	c.  service members eligible for retirement after 1 August 2009 and before 1 August 2010 – 1 year of additional service is required;

	d.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2010 and before 1 August 2011 – 2 years of additional service is required;

	e.  service members eligible for retirement on or after 1 August 2011 and before 1 August 2012 – 3 years of additional service is required; and

	f.  active duty service members who separate, retire, transfer to the Reserve, or who are discharged on or prior to 1 August 2009 are not eligible to elect transferability.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from active duty on 30 September 2009 has been carefully considered and is found to have merit.

2.  The Post-9/11 GI Bill was implemented on 1 August 2009 and information pertaining to the transferability of entitlements was disseminated down to education counselors at the installation level.

3.  Notwithstanding that the applicant did not make his application before retirement, it appears reasonable to presume that he was not informed that he had to make his transfer of educational benefits while he was still on active duty given the close proximity of the applicant's retirement on 30 September 2009 to the effective date of the Post-9/11 GI Bill (1 August 2009), and given the fact he was undergoing transition disability retirement processing prior to the implementation date.  This is especially true if he were on transition leave prior to retirement.

4.  Given the timing of the implementation of the program and the applicant's retirement, it is also reasonable to presume that he very well could have fallen through the cracks and was not notified – and it is not reasonable that he would not have enrolled while he was on active duty if he had known since he had eligible dependents and a need for the benefits.

5.  Given the circumstances in this case, it would serve the interest of equity to correct his record to reflect that he applied to transfer his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability provision upon implementation of the provision.

BOARD VOTE:

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement, provided all other eligibility criteria are met.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _ __X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019882



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019882



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022691

    Original file (20100022691.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program in order to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 30 September 2009. The evidence further shows the applicant did, in fact, apply to the VA for Post-9/11 GI Bill eligibility prior to his separation from active duty for retirement and the VA confirmed it had his application prior to his retirement. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019001

    Original file (20110019001.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents before he was medically retired from active duty on 23 September 2009. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, and 12304 (orders in support of contingency...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019088

    Original file (20110019088.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents before he was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 31 October 2009 and retired on 1 November 2009. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023572

    Original file (20110023572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his educational benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program before he retired from active duty on 31 August 2009. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 (orders in support of contingency operations, i.e.,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019871

    Original file (20110019871.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he was retired from active duty on 31 August 2009. During the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Education Incentives Branch of the Human Resources Command, at Fort Knox, Kentucky, which states, in effect, that the applicant was not eligible to transfer benefits under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008585

    Original file (20110008585.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied for the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he retired from active duty on 30 September 2009. A member is considered to be retirement eligible upon completion of 20 years of active Federal service or 20 qualifying years as computed under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 12732: a. service members eligible for retirement on 1 August 2009 – no additional...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013258

    Original file (20120013258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program before he was released from active duty on 30 September 2009. Service members must have served on active duty in the Regular Army or as a Reserve member ordered to active duty under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, and 12304 (orders in support of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001229

    Original file (20110001229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he applied to transfer his education benefits to his dependent daughter under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program. The available evidence shows he was fully eligible for transfer of his education benefits to his dependents under the Post-9/11 GI Bill, but he contends he was not aware he needed to be on active duty to transfer the benefits to his dependents. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004372

    Original file (20120004372.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he applied for the Post 9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program in order to transfer his education benefits to his dependents before he left active duty on 30 September 2009. The applicant's request that his record be corrected to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his benefits under the Post 9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from active duty on 30 September 2009 has been carefully considered and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015957

    Original file (20110015957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319, provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused educational benefits to family members. The applicant's request for correction of his record to show he applied for and the Army approved transferring his educational benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependents prior to his retirement from active duty on 30 September 2009 has been carefully considered and is found to have merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all...