Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019717
Original file (20110019717.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  12 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019717 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the authority and reason for his discharge shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) so he may obtain Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health benefits.

2.  The applicant states:

* the reasons for his discharge are all lies
* he was given a pill when he arrived at Fort Dix, NJ, for basic training and told it was for a swine flu epidemic
* he was admitted to the Fort Dix Army Hospital and treated for swine flu
* he was in critical condition and the floor was quarantined
* several people died
* the Army may be trying to hide the swine flu epidemic
* he did not receive a copy of his proposed discharge action until 15 August 2011

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and a letter from Company C, 2d Battalion, 3d Basic training Brigade, dated 11 March 1976, subject:  Proposed Discharge Action under the Provisions of Trainee Discharge Program (TDP).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 March 1976 in pay grade E-1 for training and assignment as a tactical wire operations specialist.

3.  The applicant's service records contain a Training and Doctrine Command Form 871-R (TDP Counseling), dated 11 March 1976.  This form shows he was counseled for his behavior between 9 and 11 March 1976 as indicated:

* he stated if he were not discharged from the Army he would commit suicide
* he took an overdose of pills
* he was disrespectful to his unit commander
* he disobeyed a lawful order from his platoon sergeant
* he did not train
* he went to sick call every day after returning from the hospital

4.  The applicant was evaluated by the mental hygiene clinic and was determined not to have a mental or physical disorder.  The TDP counseling form further shows his unit commander recommended his discharge.

5.  On 11 March 1976, the applicant's commander notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 5-39 (TDP).  The specific reasons for the separation action cited by the unit commander were that the applicant:

* made no effort to train, learn, or improve
* desired to be discharged
* attended sick call continuously
* showed disrespect toward authority
* took pills to show suicidal tendencies
* made the training of others more difficult

6.  On 11 March 1976, the applicant acknowledged with his signature that he received the separation notification.  The applicant waived his right to have counsel assist him, indicated he did not desire to make statements or submit a rebuttal in his own behalf, and indicated he understood that under the provisions of the TDP he would be unable to reenter the U.S. Armed Forces for a period of 2 years from the date of his discharge.  The applicant also indicated he understood that due to non-completion of requisite active duty time, VA and other benefits normally associated with completion of honorable active duty service would be affected.

7.  On 16 March 1976, the separation authority approved the separation action.

8.  On 24 March 1976, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Headquarters, Department of the Army message, DAPE-MPE, dated 1 August 1973, by reason of TDP after completing 24 days of creditable active duty service.  He was assigned a separation program designator (SPD) code of JNF.

9.  There is no evidence in the available records which indicate the applicant's acts of indiscipline were the result of medical issues.

10.  There is no evidence in the available records which indicate the applicant was diagnosed and/or treated for swine flu during his military service.

11.  Headquarters, Department of the Army, message, DAPC-MPE, dated 1 August 1973, subject:  Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180 Active Duty Days (TDP), provided the authority for discharge of enlisted personnel from the U.S. Army prior to the completion of their training for one (or more) of the following reasons:  could/would not adapt; could not meet training standards; did not meet moral, mental, or physical standards; or character and behavior disorders.  An honorable discharge was authorized for members separating under this provision.

12.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  The version in effect at the time prescribed SPD code JNF as the appropriate code to assign to enlisted Soldiers discharged under the provisions of Headquarters, Department of the Army message, DAPC-MPE, dated 1 August 1973, subject:  TDP.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to have the reason for his discharge changed to obtain VA benefits was carefully considered and determined to be without merit.  Furthermore, records are not corrected solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for benefits.

2.  The applicant demonstrated a complete inability to adapt or meet training standards needed to be a Soldier and demonstrated character and behavior characteristics not compatible with satisfactory continued service.  He received an honorable discharge under the TDP.

3.  The applicant contends he was admitted to the Fort Dix Army Hospital and was in critical condition with swine flu.  However, there is no evidence in the applicant's medical records to show he was admitted and treated for swine flu.

4.  The applicant's administrative separation is presumed to have been accomplished in accordance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.

5.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulations were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.

6.  Based on the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019717



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019717



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006438

    Original file (20130006438.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the reason for his separation was due to medical circumstances. However, on 13 July 1976 an intermediate commander recommended the applicant's discharge because he was unable to satisfactorily complete basic combat training requirements due to an EPTS medical condition. His records show his TDP case had been reviewed and an honorable discharge was approved by the appropriate...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000464

    Original file (20080000464.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the authority and reason for his separation, Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and reentry (RE) code listed on his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. On 22 January 1975, while the applicant was still in basic combat training (BCT), his unit commander notified him that action to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018446

    Original file (20100018446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) by adding a more specific narrative reason for discharge. The record does contain a Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center, Fort Gordon letter, dated 7 July 1975, which informed the applicant he was being separated from active duty under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message (Msg) DAPE-MPE, August 1973, under the Trainee Discharge Program (TDP). Further, there is no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011250

    Original file (20120011250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had served 1 month and 9 days of active service and was issued a SPD Code of “JNF” which represents the TDP and a Reenlistment Code of “3.” 7. Commanders were authorized to issue either an Honorable or General Discharge and the separation code for discharge under the TDP was "JNF." Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009041

    Original file (20070009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows, in pertinent part, that on 29 November 1975, the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 3rd Brigade, Fort Ord, California, in duty military occupational specialty code (MOSC) 09B0O for the purpose of attending BCT. On 8 April 1975, the colonel serving as Commander, School Brigade, U.S. Army Signal School, Fort Gordon, Georgia, approved the separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003459

    Original file (20120003459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His L5 disc was damaged while in basic combat training (BCT), but it was not known until he requested a copy of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) and medical records that he received on 22 July 2011. b. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-200 (Active duty Enlisted Administrative...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015370

    Original file (20130015370.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical records are not available. There is no evidence submitted with his application or in the evidence of record that suggests that the applicant was deemed medically unfit for retention or separation or that his discharge was related to his medical condition. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110023350 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130015370 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013833

    Original file (20060013833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060013833 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. On 28 February 1975, the applicant was notified of her pending separation under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message DAPE-MPE 011510Z August 1973 Subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees Before 180...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000461

    Original file (20130000461.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show the reason for his discharge as medical. On 11 October 1974, he was counseled concerning his difficulties in working with the trainees of his platoon. The regulation essentially requires that the service member must have voluntarily enlisted; must be in basic, advanced individual training, on the job, or service school training prior to award of a military occupational specialty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006127

    Original file (20130006127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was discharged due to medical reasons. On 17 August 1975, the applicant was notified that he was being recommended for discharge under the provisions of Department of the Army (DA) Message Date Time Group (DTG) 811510Z August 1973, subject: Evaluation and Discharge of Enlistees before 180 Active Duty Days. The notification also indicated the applicant had been previously counseled by his...