Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019597
Original file (20110019597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019597 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request to add the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the CIB while serving in the Dominican Republic.

3.  The applicant provides:

* an eyewitness statement from a fellow Soldier at the time in question
* the fellow Soldier's DD Form 214 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110000851 on 16 August 2011.

2.  The eyewitness statement is new evidence that will be considered by the Board.

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 May 1965 for a period of 3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman).  He served in MOS 11B while assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 504th Infantry, in the Dominican Republic from 1 March 1966 to 6 August 1966.  He served in MOS 11B assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 505th Infantry, in Vietnam from 14 February 1968 to 8 May 1968.  On 25 May 1968, he was released from active duty and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.
 
4.  His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award.

5.  There are no orders for the CIB in the available records.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the CIB.

7.  He provides an eyewitness statement from a fellow Soldier at the time in question, dated 7 September 2011, who attests:

* he and the applicant served in the Dominican Republic Campaign from 1965 to 1966 with the 504th Infantry, 82nd Airborne Division
* during their tour of duty they were in direct combat with the enemy and they earned the CIB for their participation in the Dominican Republic Campaign
* they were in the same unit, they pulled guard duty together, they went out on patrol together, and they pulled road block together
* they were awarded the CIB in the Dominican Republic after President Johnson issued the order because of their service there 

8.  He also provides a copy of the fellow Soldier's DD Form 214 which shows the CIB as an authorized award.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he was awarded the CIB while in the Dominican Republic.

2.  The evidence shows he was an infantryman in an infantry unit during his assignments in the Dominican Republic and Vietnam.  However, there are no orders for the CIB pertaining to the applicant.
3.  There is no evidence of record that shows he served in active ground combat while assigned to an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size as required by the governing regulation.

4.  In the absence of orders officially awarding him the CIB, the eyewitness statement or the fact the fellow Soldier received the CIB are not sufficient as a basis for adding the CIB to his DD Form 214.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are 
insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110000851, dated 16 August 2011.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019597



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019597



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004994C071029

    Original file (20070004994C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant's Military Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no order or other documents that indicate he was ever awarded the CIB while serving on active duty. Although the evidence of record confirms the applicant's service in the Dominican Republic in a qualifying infantry MOS and infantry unit, it does not contain documentary evidence that verifies that the applicant was personally present and participated while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004912

    Original file (20090004912.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters 173rd Airborne Brigade (Separate), Special Orders Number 116, dated 26 April 1967, show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while a member of Company B, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry, during his service in the Republic of Vietnam. The applicant's records do not contain orders that show he was awarded a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant held an infantry MOS and was assigned to an infantry battalion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000851

    Original file (20110000851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's records that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he actually participated in active ground combat. Therefore, the evidence is insufficient to correct his record to show this badge. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021672

    Original file (20100021672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and his foreign service. The applicant states: a. he served in the Dominican Republic and he participated in active ground combat from 28 April "1995" - "1 September 1966"; b. his DD Form 214 documents the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) he received for his 5 months service in the Dominican Republic; and c. he was an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017875

    Original file (20090017875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was awarded the CIB while serving with the Special Forces in the Republic of Vietnam during the period January 1967 through January 1968. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit. The evidence shows the applicant was awarded his first CIB for participation in the Dominican Republic during the period 28 April 1965...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007986

    Original file (20140007986.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Master Parachutist Badge and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) (2nd Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 the VSM and the BSM; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 June 1968 – * Master...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009524

    Original file (20060009524.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 February 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060009524 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant was subsequently separated from the service and requested that he be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027799

    Original file (20100027799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, his statement indicates the applicant was a combat engineer and demolition specialist attached to an engineer detachment in Vietnam, not an infantryman in an infantry unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015687

    Original file (20080015687.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this same document had an entry which showed that he was awarded the CIB, but this entry, which did not contain an authority for awarding the CIB, was also struck through. There is no evidence that he performed duties in MOS 11 on his DA Form 20. Further, although he provides pictures from his service in the RVN, these pictures do not conclusively show that he was performing infantryman duties or that he was actively engaged in combat against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002631

    Original file (20130002631.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * two sworn statements from fellow Soldiers * orders * awards * Vietnam Combat Certificate * Print out from the Vietnam Memorial * 26 photographs depicting Soldiers in Vietnam * 189 pages of Daily Journals of the 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division, dated between 1 April and 13 May 1968 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as...