Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019229
Original file (20110019229.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019229 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was wounded twice by shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and he did not receive a Purple Heart for his combat wounds.

3.  The applicant provides:

* pages 3 and 4 of his DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), last audited on 25 February 1969
* pages 3 and 4 of his DD Form 20, last audited on 7 November 1969

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 March 1967 for a period of
3 years.  He held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman).

3.  He served in the RVN from 2 December 1967 to 1 December 1968.  He was assigned to Company C, 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 187th Infantry.

4.  His record contains three DA Forms 20 authenticated by the applicant.

5.  His Form 20, prepared on 30 March 1967 and last audited on 25 February 1969, shows in:

* item 40 (Wounds) no entry (blank)
* item 41 (Awards and Decorations) the:

* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Parachutist Badge
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M14)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar (M16)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M60)

6.  His DA Form 20, prepared and last audited on 7 November 1969, contains the annotation "Temporary Records prepared by CIF Board at Fort Lee, VA."  It shows in:

* Item 40 the entries:

* shrapnel wound to right shoulder, 17 September 1968
* shrapnel wound left side, 4 July 1968

* Item 41 no entry (blank)

7.  His DA Form 20, last audited on 30 January 1970, shows no entry in either item 40 or item 41.

8.  On 31 October 1970, he was released from active duty at the expiration of his term on service.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.

9.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

10.  His medical records are not available for review with this case.

11.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

12.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for award of the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  His service record contains a temporary DA Form 20 that shows he was wounded on two separate occasions while serving in the RVN.  It is unclear whether the applicant was the source of this information or it was based on medical evidence.  In either case, these entries do not appear on subsequent
DA Forms 20 authenticated by the applicant.  His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing and there are no medical records available to corroborate he sustained any combat injuries.

3.  Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his claimed injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis upon which to award him any Purple Hearts in this case.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019229



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019229



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006000C071029

    Original file (20070006000C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Valorous Unit Award, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005367

    Original file (20080005367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009760

    Original file (20090009760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 11 August to 30 October 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides the Army's awards policy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009477

    Original file (20080009477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The evidence of record provides no indication that the applicant was ever wounded in action while serving in the RVN, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012393C080407

    Original file (20070012393C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of any medical treatment record that shows the applicant was ever treated for a combat- related wound or injury while serving in the RVN. No PH orders pertaining to the applicant were in this file. Therefore, absent any evidence showing he was wounded in action, or that he was ever awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support award of the PH in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013829

    Original file (20080013829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) includes an entry in Item 31 (Foreign Service) that shows he served in the RVN from 12 October 1969 through 16 February 1970. The PH guidance contained in the awards regulation further states that accidents, to include accidental wounding, not related to or caused by enemy action clearly do not qualify for award of the PH. Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and the PH is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040006890C070208

    Original file (20040006890C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 9 June 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040006890 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. However, by regulation, in order to award the PH it is necessary to establish that a Soldier was wounded as a result of enemy action, that he was treated by military medical personnel for the wound for which the award is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000389

    Original file (20090000389.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart because he was wounded in action in the spring of 1969 while serving in the RVN. However, he provides insufficient evidence in support of his claim for award of the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action; his DA Form 20 does not show an entry in item 40 or list the Purple Heart in item 41;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002117C071029

    Original file (20070002117C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), he was injured during an artillery attack. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) is void of orders or any other documents showing the applicant was ever recommended for, or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. His record is void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016959C071029

    Original file (20060016959C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the RVN from 9 January 1970 through 8 August 1971. Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and Item 41 does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards entered. Further, the list of authorized awards contained in Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not include the PH, and he authenticated this document with his signature on the date of his...