Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019106
Original file (20110019106.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  15 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110019106 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and all authorized awards.

2.  The applicant states that he served a combat tour in Vietnam as an infantryman and he was told that he was authorized the CIB and that he was being awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM); however, neither award is listed on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 7 November 1967.  He completed basic training at Fort Ord, California and advanced individual training in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) at Fort Lewis, Washington before being transferred to Vietnam on 19 April 1968.

3.  He was initially assigned to Company D, 2d Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division for duty as a rifleman.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 24 April 1968.

4.  On 3 July 1968, he was assigned to the 611th Ordnance Company for duty as an ammo storage helper.  On 19 October 1968, he was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 and he was awarded the primary MOS of 55B20 (Ammunition Storage Specialist) and MOS 11B20 was awarded as his secondary MOS.

5.  On 11 April 1969, he departed Vietnam and was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado for duty as an ammunition storage specialist where he remained until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 3 July 1969 due to hardship.  He had served 1 year, 7 months, and 27 days of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with one bronze service star and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device 1960.

6.  A review of his records show that he had excellent conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service and his records are void of any derogatory information that would serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM).

7.  A review of the applicant's records failed to show any evidence that he was awarded the CIB or any other awards and it failed to show that he engaged the enemy in combat while in Vietnam.  Additionally, a search of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant any additional awards. 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the ARCOM may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the AGCM, disqualification must be justified.  

11.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant's unit was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s records contain no orders awarding him the CIB and/or the ARCOM.  There is also no evidence to show that he engaged the enemy in combat while assigned as an infantryman to an infantry unit.  Accordingly, these awards should not be awarded or added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

2.  However, after carefully examining the applicant’s record of service, it appears that the applicant should have received the first award of the AGCM for his service from 7 November 1967 through 3 July 1969.  This conclusion is based on the fact that the record is void of any derogatory information which would preclude the applicant from being awarded the AGCM and the lack of any specific action by the applicant’s unit commander to disqualify him from receiving this award.

3.  The evidence suggests that the applicant not receiving the AGCM was likely the result of an administrative error as opposed to it being the result of a conscious disqualification by any of his unit commanders.  Therefore, in the interest of justice, this error should be corrected and the applicant should be awarded the AGCM at this time.



4.  Additionally, the applicant’s unit was awarded a MUC and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during the period he served with the unit.  Accordingly, he is entitled to have those awards added to his DD Form 214 at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X ___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for his service from 7 November 1967 through 3 July1969 while serving in the rank of SP4 and adding it to his DD Form 214
* adding the awards of the MUC and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to his DD Form 214

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to awarding him the CIB and the ARCOM.




      _______ _   X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019106



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110019106



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010578

    Original file (20130010578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. The applicant was serving as an infantryman in an infantry unit when he was cited for award of the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroism in connection with military operations against a hostile force in Vietnam which is sufficient evidence to show he was authorized award of the CIB. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010204

    Original file (20090010204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Air Medal (AM), CIB, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 and M-16) and Machinegun (M-60) Bars, and two overseas service bars. Thus, these awards should also be added to his record and DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006660

    Original file (20130006660.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 27 July 1967 through 16 May 1969 and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. However, there is no evidence in the available records to show that he was awarded the BSM and ARCOM and there is no evidence to show that his unit was awarded the MUC during the period he served with the unit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021990

    Original file (20100021990.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the AGCM (1st Award) for his qualifying period of honorable service from 28 May 1965 to 27 May 1968. The evidence of record in this case confirms that although the applicant served in duty MOS 11B during his RVN tour, he never held an infantry MOS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009386

    Original file (20130009386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: a. item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * "V" Device on already listed Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) * Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) b. item "21a" (taken to mean item 23a (Specialty Number and Title)) - "flight crew member [duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002427

    Original file (20120002427.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice and equity to award him the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 9 July 1968 through 20 April 1970, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. Notwithstanding the staff DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS above, the Board believed that the evidence concerning the Army Commendation Medal, i.e., the award certificate, was insufficient without corroborating orders to support...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078850C070215

    Original file (2002078850C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states that his military record will support his entitlement to the CIB by showing that he served as an infantryman in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 14 October 1966. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the CIB, there must be evidence confirming that the individual receiving the award held an infantry MOS (11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H), and served in active ground combat while...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000991

    Original file (20150000991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders for the ARCOM or CIB in the applicant's available records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the ARCOM as an authorized award; however, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the applicant's available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968 through 18 December 1969, b. deleting award of the ARCOM and VSM from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003091562C070212

    Original file (2003091562C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. However, his record does show that he earned the PH, for being wounded in action while serving in the RVN and that he received the Parachutist Badge based on his completion of the Airborne Course. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010430

    Original file (20110010430.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, three additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant states, in effect: * He never received several of the above awards * He was under the impression that the above awards would follow him from Vietnam to his next duty station, Fort Bragg, NC * He served in Vietnam from (July 1966 to July 1967) * The day he...