Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018780
Original file (20110018780.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his period of service in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he needs the addition of the specific reference to serving in Vietnam to be added to his DD Form 214 for membership in the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and a letter from a VFW post.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty from 30 December 1965 through 26 January 1969 in the military occupational specialty 76P (Materiel Control And Accounting Specialist).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows service in Vietnam with the 610th Intelligence Battalion and the 506th Supply and Service Company from 6 July 1967 through 2 July 1968.

4.  Line 22c of his DD Form 214 shows one year of foreign service in the "USARPAC".  It also shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army.  It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states the Remarks block is used for Headquarters Department of the Army mandatory requirements when a separate block is not available and as a continuation for entries in blocks 11, 13, and 14.  The regulation as in effect at the time of the applicant's separation stated that the last area of foreign service would be added on the Foreign and Sea Service line.  The current regulation states that for an active duty Soldier deployed with his or her unit during their continuous period of active service, enter the following statement "SERVICE IN (NAME OF COUNTRY DEPLOYED) FROM (inclusive dates for example, YYYYMMDD - YYYYMMDD)." 

6.  Department of Defense Directive 1332.28 (Discharge Review Procedures and Standards) provides, in pertinent part, that a discharge shall be deemed equitable unless the policies and procedures under which the applicant was discharged differ materially from those currently in effect, provided that the current policies or procedures represent a substantial enhancement of rights and there is substantial doubt that the same result would have obtained under the current standards.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  At the time of the applicant's service the last area of foreign service was denoted on the DD Form 214 at 22C (Foreign Service).  The regulation did not specifically indicate what this entry was to be and depending on the command completing the DD Form 214, the entry utilized the theater of operation not the specific country.  

2.  With changes in governing regulation, now when a Soldier is deployed to an area where hazardous duty or imminent danger pay is authorized, the specific country and the period of service are entered in the Remarks block. 

3.  The current regulation is a substantial enhancement of rights and it is appropriate to utilize the current provision and add the following statement to the applicant's DD Form 214: SERVICE IN VIETNAM FROM 6 July 19670706 - 2 July 19680702. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding at the Remarks block on the DD Form 214: SERVICE IN VIETNAM FROM 6 JULY 19670706 - 2 JULY 19680702. 



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018780





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018780



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013894

    Original file (20110013894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s qualifying period of service in Thailand is not in question; however, there is insufficient evidence that shows his service in Thailand was in direct support of operations in Vietnam. Therefore, absent any evidence indicating he or his unit served in direct support of operations in the Republic of Vietnam, the regulatory criteria necessary to support award of the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006822

    Original file (20130006822.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 18 August 1965 through 9 July 1967 * deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214 and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003686

    Original file (20150003686.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time credits him with completing 1 year, 7 months, and 4 days of total active service, including 1 year and 4 days of foreign service in an unspecified theater of operations. It stated that for: a. item 22c (Statement of Service – Foreign and/or Sea Service) enter the total active service performed outside the continental limits of the U.S. for the period covered by the DD Form 214, and the last overseas theater service in which the service was performed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009818

    Original file (20120009818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. His DD Form 214 only shows two overseas service bars; therefore, his DD Form, 214 should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017975

    Original file (20130017975.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It specified that item 22c of the DD Form 214 would contain the total amount of active duty served outside the continental limits of the United States during the period covered by the DD Form 214 and the last overseas theater in which the service was performed (e.g., USARPAC). Based on his service in Korea, he is authorized the Korea Defense Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015420

    Original file (20110015420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following: a. separation as a specialist four (E-4); b. service in Vietnam from 24 October to 1968 through 17 December 1969 (1 year, 1 month, 24 days) with the 596th Signal Company; c. his recorded conduct and efficiency ratings are excellent; d. service during two campaign periods; and e. award of the National Defense Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027513

    Original file (20100027513.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed 1 year and 27 days of foreign service in Korea and 1 year, 4 months, and 7 days of foreign service in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023770

    Original file (20110023770.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not include his Vietnam service or service dates, the company he was assigned to in Vietnam, his medical information, or all the awards and decorations he received. The applicant's record shows his service in Vietnam met the time requirements for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022374

    Original file (20110022374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record (PQR)), that appears to have been created on or about 1 August 1973, records 74 months of overseas service prior to 1 October 1960, service in Korea from 13 July 1964 through 21 July 1965 and service in Vietnam from 15 May 1972 through 30 March 1973. His DD Form 214 shows, at item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service), 8 years and 25 days with a notation in item 27 (Remarks) the country of service as Vietnam. Therefore, as an exception...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000265

    Original file (20110000265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service. It further stated: a. item 22a(1) would show the total service between dates shown in items 10c or 17c and 11d of the DD Form 214, as represented by continual and foreign service, less time lost; b. item 22a(2) would show all prior service excluding any service shown in item 22a(1); c. item 22a(3) is...