Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018623
Original file (20110018623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 March 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018623 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was injured in Vietnam while serving as a medical corpsman in combat and desires to be awarded the Purple Heart based on General Orders Number 2958.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of General Orders Number 2958 issued by Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division on 11 November 1966 and a copy of his Personnel Qualification Record – Part II (DA Form 2-1).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 13 May 1963.  He completed his basic training at Fort Dix, New Jersey and his advanced individual training as a medical corpsman at Fort Sam Houston, Texas before being transferred to Fort Hood, Texas.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-5 on 17 April 1965.

3.  On 13 May 1965 he reenlisted for a period of 6 years and assignment to an artillery unit in Lockport, New York.  He was transferred to Lockport on 26 May 1965.

4.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 13 August 1966 and on 22 September 1966 he was wounded (fragment wound of right arm, chest, both legs and hemothorax of right lung)  when at 1430 hours an explosion in the minefield adjacent to the perimeter injured three members of the base camp who had been laying concertina wire.  The applicant and several other corpsman from the aid station rushed to the scene of the explosion to aid the injured persons and the applicant with complete disregard for his own safety, dauntlessly entered the mine area and began administering first aid.  A second explosion occurred injuring the applicant and killing or wounding some of the others accompanying him and although suffering from multiple injuries, he dressed his wounds and then treated many of the other casualties until he collapsed from loss of blood and completed exhaustion.  He was medically evacuated to the 93d Evacuation Hospital and then to the 249th General Hospital in Japan on 2 October 1966.  He was awarded the Soldier’s Medal for that action on 11 November 1966.

5.  He returned to Vietnam on 26 January 1967 and served in Vietnam until 4 September 1967 when he was transferred to Fort Carson, Colorado.

6.  He remained on active duty through a series of continuous reenlistments until he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) at Fort Hood on 31 December 1985 in the pay grade of E-7 and was placed on the Retired List effective 1 January 1986.  He had served 22 years, 7 months and 18 days of active service.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Soldier’s Medal, Meritorious Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal with one oak leaf cluster, Army Good Conduct Medal (6th award), National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service ribbon with numeral “2”, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Combat Medical Badge.

7.  A review of the applicant’s official records and a search of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While there is no doubt that the applicant was wounded/injured in Vietnam, there is no evidence in the available records to show that the unfortunate incident was the result of enemy action.

2.  Therefore, absent evidence to show otherwise, it appears that he is not authorized the award of the Purple Heart and there is no basis to award it at this time. 

3.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION








BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   _X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018623





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018623



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012154

    Original file (20140012154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    f. The ROP stated that his medical records were not available for the time he was in Vietnam and that his personnel records were void of nearly all documentation related to Vietnam. He has the Army Commendation Medal, shrapnel still in his arm, and the Board states he needs more proof. There is no available evidence of record and the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence provided showing he show he sustained a wound/injury as a result of enemy action, received treatment, and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002724

    Original file (20080002724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his military records awarding him the Purple Heart. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant failed to provide evidence which conclusively proves that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 8 November 1966 to 7 November 1968 while serving as a specialist...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003302

    Original file (20150003302.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * he was wounded by shrapnel during his service in Vietnam * he feels he should have received the Purple Heart at the time * his efforts to receive this award have been unsuccessful thus far * his service medical record should show treatment 3. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart for a shrapnel wound incurred while he served in Vietnam. Should the applicant be able to obtain additional evidence (such as unit reports or other official documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019277

    Original file (20100019277.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for the following awards: a. The evidence of record shows the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity, in the absence of official documentary evidence such as operation orders, morning reports, after action reports, official orders to corroborate the events that led to his alleged injury, or additional documentation that conclusively shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004938

    Original file (20150004938.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded for qualifying service in Vietnam. He was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the Good Conduct Medal and Vietnam Service Medal * adding to his DD Form 214, ending on 30 July 1976 the: * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019105

    Original file (20100019105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000092C070205

    Original file (20060000092C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, 1st Battalion, 22d Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 54, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017569

    Original file (20140017569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant describes actions and circumstances surrounding the injuries he sustained: * on 20 (sic) April 1966, during a combat mission while serving as door gunner when enemy fire hit one of the outside M-60 gun barrels and shrapnel lodged in his right leg * on 18 May 1966, during a mortar and 75mm recoilless rifle attack on the base by the enemy when he was running to get his aircraft ready for immediate takeoff and he sustained a deep wound to his left foot a. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014691

    Original file (20110014691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing * Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000539

    Original file (20110000539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The criteria for the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of combat. Notwithstanding the applicant's...