IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  5 April 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20110018514 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he was unfairly treated after having served over 1 year of good and honorable overseas duty.  He was unaware of the procedure to request an upgrade of his discharge.  He may be suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) for the period ending 18 June 1954.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years on 1 September 1951.  This form also shows he held an infantry specialty.  However, at the time of his discharge, he held military occupational specialty 2356 (Duty Soldier) and his most significant duty assignment (i.e., his last duty assignment) was with Station Company, Detachment Number 1, 6016th Army Service Unit.

4.  His DD Form 214 further shows he completed 2 years, 5 months, and 24 days of creditable active military service of which 1 year, 11 months, and 21 days was foreign service.

5.  He was awarded the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars, United Nations Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and National Defense Service Medal.

6.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his records contain the following documents.

	a.  Special Orders Number 140 issued by Headquarters, Personnel Center, Fort Bliss, TX, on 16 June 1954, ordered his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 (Enlisted Men – Discharge – Unfitness (Undesirable Habits or Traits of Character)) effective 18 June 1954.

	b.  A duly-constituted DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 18 June 1954 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge.  This form also shows he had 114 days of lost time.

7.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

8.  Army Regulation 615-368, in effect at the time, set forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel by reason of unfitness.  This regulation provided for the discharge of individuals who had demonstrated their unfitness by giving evidence of habits and traits of character manifested by misconduct.  Unfitness included habits and traits of character manifested by antisocial or amoral trend, chronic alcoholism, criminalism, drug addiction, pathological lying, homosexuality, sexual perversion, or misconduct.  An undesirable discharge was normally considered appropriate.

9.  Army Regulation 615-368 also stated that a board of officers would recommend that the individual either be discharged because of unfitness or unsuitability, or retained in the service.  The regulation stated that discharge, if recommended, would be for unfitness, except that discharge because of unsuitability (under Army Regulation 615-369 (Enlisted Personnel – Discharge – Inaptitude or Unsuitability)) without referral to another board might be recommended in borderline cases if military circumstances and the character of service rendered by the individual during his current period of service so warranted.  As examples, such circumstances would apply where the cause of unfitness had been minor relative to the length of efficient service or where there had been a definite effort at self control or where an individual had distinguished himself by an act of heroism during his current period of service which in itself reflected great credit on the individual and the military service.

10.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), currently in effect, governs the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his discharge should be upgraded and the evidence he provided as well as his available service record, including his service in Korea, were carefully considered.  Regretfully, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

2.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge are not available for review with this case.  However, his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 18 June 1954 under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-368 with an undesirable discharge.  This form also shows he had 114 days of lost time.

3.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it appears the applicant had a history of misconduct that led his chain of command to recommend his separation.  It is presumed that his administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations at the time with no procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.  It is also presumed that the separation authority appropriately directed issuance of an undesirable discharge based on his overall record during the period under review.

4.  Based on his available record, his service appears not to have met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to grant him the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X ___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018514



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20110018514



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1