IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 27 March 2012
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018303
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that her DA Form 31 (Request and Authority for Leave), dated 11 December 2007, for emergency leave be corrected to show the actual dates she originally requested and was granted by her commander.
2. The applicant states she originally requested and was granted 16 days of emergency leave and this is the leave she actually took. She claims her original form was replaced by a form with several errors. She states she departed on leave 12 December and returned on 27 December 2007; however, when she picked up a copy of her leave form upon return she discovered she had erroneously been signed out on 2 December 2007. She also discovered she was not signed in, on 27 December 2007, the date she returned, but rather on
3 January 2008. She further states she was told not to worry by a local finance official who indicated she could have her supervisor call her to verify she returned on 27 December 2007 and the leave form would be amended.
3. The applicant provides a self-authored statement, DA Form 31, Debit Transaction Register, and electronic mail (e-mail) between her and the Defense Finance and Accounting Service.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows after having served in an enlisted status, the applicant was appointed as a warrant officer one, on 19 January 2006, and entered active duty in that status. On 3 April 2008, she was honorably discharged by reason of failure to complete a course of instruction. She completed 2 years, 2 months, and 15 days of active service.
3. The applicants record is void of any documents related to the leave in question. The applicant provides a DA Form 31, dated 11 December 2007, which shows she requested emergency leave from 12 December to
27 December 2007, and this leave was approved. This document also shows she signed out on leave on 2 December 2007 at 1035 hours and that she returned from leave at 1645 hours on 3 January 2008. She also provides a bank checking account statement, dated 4 January 2008, that indicates she had debit purchases from the Fort Rucker, Alabama Commissary, on 28 December 2007.
4. Army Regulation 600-8-10 (Leaves and Passes) prescribes the policies and mandated operating tasks for the leave and pass function of the Military Personnel System. Paragraph 12-1 contains the procedures for processing leaves. It states chargeable leave will begin and end on post, at the duty station, or in the location from which the Soldier regularly commutes to duty. Soldiers will be physically present in the local area (defined as on post, duty station, or in the location from which the Soldier regularly commutes to duty) at the beginning and ending of leave.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants request to correct her leave form has been carefully considered and found to have merit. The DA Form 31 provided by the applicant has many inconsistencies and should have been corrected during the reconciliation process between the finance office and battalion S-1.
2. However, what is clear is the DA Form 31 in question was not prepared until 11 December 2007 and the leave request dates were from 12 to 27 December 2007. As a result, it would appear to confirm the applicants assertion that she did not begin her leave until 12 December 2007. Further, given there is no indication the applicants leave was extended or that there was a change in her duty status to absent without leave after her leave expired. In addition, she provides a checking account statement showing she was physically present at Fort Rucker, on 28 December 2007, which provides corroboration of her statement she returned to Alabama late on 27 December 2007.
3. In view of the facts of this case, it appears clear several errors were made on the applicants leave form. The supporting documents provided by the applicant and the core data on the DA Form 31 seem to clearly establish the applicants leave was approved on 11 December 2007 for 16 days from 12 to 27 December 2007.
4. Absent any official documentation explaining why she would have departed on leave 9 days before the form was prepared, or that confirms any official duty status change based on her not reporting back on time, it appears the applicants claim that she took the amount of leave on the dates that were approved is credible. As a result, it would be appropriate to correct the applicants leave form and record to show she is responsible for 16 days of chargeable leave from
12 December to 27 December 2007 and to reimburse her any money collected as a result of the error in the leave period in question.
BOARD VOTE:
___X____ ___X.___ ____X__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending her 11 December 2007 DA Form 31 to show she departed on leave on 12 December 2007 and returned from leave on 27 December 2007 which resulted in 16 days of chargeable leave and by reimbursing her any money collected based on the incorrect period of chargeable leave for the period in question.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018303
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018303
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014305
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In this statement, the applicant requested that his leave to Guam be categorized as emergency leave for a family emergency, and that Becky M____ stood in loco parentis for more than 5 years (in place of parents 24 hours a day) before he became 21 years of age. As the validity of the applicant's claim that Becky M____ stood in loco parentis for more than 5 years before he became 21 cannot be...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03436
On 21 February 2003, the applicant applied for ten days of PTDY from 25 February to 6 March 2003 and for Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003 and the leave was approved as evidenced by AF Form 988’s. Her original request for PTDY and Terminal Leave were on separate AF Form 988’s for ten days PTDY (leave approved by the commander but not debited against the leave account) from 25 February to 6 March 2003, and for 73 days of Terminal Leave from 7 March to 18 May 2003. After careful...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007148
Soldiers may not use PTDY in combination with ordinary leave without completing a duty day between the two periods of leave. The available evidence shows that prior to the FSMs permanent disability retirement she had an accrued leave balance of 78 days. Therefore, the request for 20 days of transition PTDY should not be granted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011945
The applicant requests, in effect, his records be corrected to count the period of time between 1 May 2007 and 26 January 2009 as active service and that he be so compensated. The form shows: * he requested ordinary leave for Thursday 8 March 2007 and Friday 9 March 2007 * He indicated his leave address as XXXX Morningside Drive, NW, Washington, DC * he departed on ordinary leave at 0001 hours, on 8 March 2007 * he was granted a 2-day extension on Saturday, 10 March 2007 * he returned to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012969
The applicant provides a self-authored statement; DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with an effective date of 30 August 2007; DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate), dated 30 August 2007; DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), on an undetermined date in May 2007; Headquarters and Support Company, 404th Aviation Support Battalion, Combat Aviation Brigade, Fort Hood, Texas, memoranda, all dated 15 May 2007, subject: Pregnancy Counseling; DA Form 4856...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015932C071029
I had the days on record and they charged me negative 40 days leave when I had the days by LES (Leave and Earnings Statement), DA Form 31, and orders. The applicant further states that he should not now be charged and be held accountable for the resultant indebtedness to the Government in the amount of $1,827.75 for receiving incorrect information from his chain of command about, in effect, his leave availability and its chargeability against his accrued leave account. Further, they are...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003794
On 6 January 1982, the major general serving as Commander, U.S. Army Aviation Center and Fort Rucker, Fort Rucker, Alabama, approved the applicant's request for discharge from the U.S. Army under the provisions of Chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 and directed that the applicant be furnished an under other than honorable discharge. The applicant contends, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge because the reason...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004062
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. She stated: * she first received the BSM while she was in Iraq before her departure on emergency leave * the BSM was mailed to her by her platoon sergeant * the DA Form 638 and the medal itself is the only proof of her receipt of the BSM 11. In her response to USAHRC MAB, the applicant states she initially received the BSM prior to her 22 October 2003 departure for emergency leave.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020120
The applicant states, in October 2010 she updated her Officer Record Brief and Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) for the Fiscal Year 2011 CPT promotion board. It states an SSB may be convened to consider or reconsider commissioned officers for promotion when Headquarters, Department of the Army discovers one or more of the following: an officer was not considered from in or above the promotion zone by a regularly scheduled board because of administrative error, including officers who...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009092C080407
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage election of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be changed from "Spouse Only" to "Former Spouse Only"; and that she be provided the SBP annuity based on the death of the FSM. The DFAS records further show that the FSM's SBP coverage designation at the time of his death was still "Spouse Only", and the FSM's current wife is now receiving her SBP annuity. On 30 May 2007, DFAS received an...